FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.27.0, FreeRDP H.264 decoder backends can return YUV planes sized from the bitstream without comparing the decoded width and height to the RDPGFX surface dimensions used to validate region rectangles. A malicious RDP server can provide an AVC420 or AVC444 bitstream whose decoded frame is smaller than the negotiated surface, causing yuv420_context_decode and the YUV-to-RGB conversion paths to read beyond the decoder-owned planes in libfreerdp/codec/h264.c and the selected H.264 backend. This can disclose client memory or crash the client. This issue is fixed in version 3.27.0.
CVE-2026-55192
This high-severity CVE scores 7.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5%, top 58% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 7.2
- EG Score
- 7.2(medium)
- EG Risk
- 63(Attend)EG Risk 63/100SSVC: Attend
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity72% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 42%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 19, 2026
Last Modified
September 9, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Aug 19, 2026Out-of-bounds read in H.264 YUV-to-RGB conversion due to decoder/surface dimension mismatch · Advisory · FreeRDP/FreeRDP · GitHub
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-3mmf-qh4f-frm63.27.0
Patch available: FreeRDP/FreeRDP 3.27.0
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/releases/tag/3.27.0Bounds fixes
Fix merged in FreeRDP/FreeRDP PR #12873 on 2026-06-11 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/pull/12873commit 0cd45b70bb1f (FreeRDP/FreeRDP)
Fix landed in FreeRDP/FreeRDP commit 0cd45b70bb1f — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/0cd45b70bb1fe6befd258ff64c46461947e99adbVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-55192(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(3)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | winpr3-utils (3.30.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0.26.04.1) @ resolute | 2026-09-18 | ubuntu |
| redhat | freerdp-2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.16 | 2026-09-17 | redhat |
| redhat | freerdp-0:2.1.1-5.el7_9.12 | 2026-09-17 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp2 | 2.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1 (13 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp3 | 3.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.31.0+dfsg-1 (44 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| freerdp3 | 3.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo13+1 (33 versions) | 3.27.0+dfsg-1 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(2)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 26× in last 7d / 105× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 109 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-09-18 21:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 21:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 09:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 21:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 21:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 19:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 09:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 21:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 09:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 09:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 21:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 08:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 08:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 03:11 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 08:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 21:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 21:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-13 09:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 21:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 21:30 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-12 09:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 21:53 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 21:53 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 10:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 10:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 22:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 10:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-09 22:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 14:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 02:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 21:22 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 20:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 20:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 08:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 20:52 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 20:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 09:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 21:15 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 08:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 21:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 21:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 19:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 19:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-31 19:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-31 06:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 19:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 07:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 07:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 19:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-29 07:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-29 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-28 19:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-28 03:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 16:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 04:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 16:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 16:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 16:12 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 16:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 04:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 04:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 03:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-25 03:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 17:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 04:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 16:45 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 04:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 04:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-22 17:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-22 05:20 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-22 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 17:31 UTCVendor advisory
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-55192?
When was CVE-2026-55192 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-55192 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55192?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55192?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55192
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55192?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.