CVE-2026-55191

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-62660 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.27.0, FreeRDP clients that negotiate RDPGFX AVC444 with an H.264 decoder backend calculate the intermediate YUV444 allocation size in libfreerdp/codec/h264.c with 32-bit multiplication in avc444_ensure_buffer. A malicious RDP server can supply surface dimensions for which piDstStride multiplied by padDstHeight wraps to a small nonzero value, causing winpr_aligned_recalloc to allocate an undersized buffer before YUV420CombineToYUV444 writes using the actual stride and rectangle dimensions. This can cause a client crash and may permit code execution through attacker-influenced heap corruption. This issue is fixed in version 3.27.0.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
50th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 26, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Nov 2, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_pr, github_release, github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Heap-buffer-overflow write in AVC444 YUV buffer allocation · Advisory · FreeRDP/FreeRDP · GitHub

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-vx73-w5q6-7jqr
GitHub release Patch Available

3.27.0

Patch available: FreeRDP/FreeRDP 3.27.0

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/releases/tag/3.27.0
GitHub pull request

Bounds fixes

Fix merged in FreeRDP/FreeRDP PR #12873 on 2026-06-11 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/pull/12873
GitHub commit

commit 97f40b9e766a (FreeRDP/FreeRDP)

Fix landed in FreeRDP/FreeRDP commit 97f40b9e766a — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/97f40b9e766af375f4e41ac6a3f4397d708d249c

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuwinpr3-utils (3.30.0+dfsg-0ubuntu0.26.04.1) @ resolute2026-11-12ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp—
  • every version up to 3.27.1-r0: fixed in 3.27.1-r0
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp22.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1 (13 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp33.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.32.2+dfsg-1 (50 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp33.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.26.0+dfsg-1~bpo13+1 (33 versions)
  • every version up to 3.27.0+dfsg-1: fixed in 3.27.0+dfsg-1
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 49× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 297 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 197 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 15:40 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-11 16:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  5. 2026-11-10 18:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  7. 2026-11-09 19:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  9. 2026-11-08 20:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  11. 2026-11-07 22:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  13. 2026-11-06 23:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  15. 2026-11-06 12:25 UTCOSV refresh
  16. 2026-11-06 00:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  18. 2026-11-05 01:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  20. 2026-11-04 03:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  22. 2026-11-03 04:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-03 04:23 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  25. 2026-11-02 05:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-02 05:28 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  3. 2026-11-01 06:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-01 06:44 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  6. 2026-10-31 08:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-10-31 08:00 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  9. 2026-10-30 09:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-10-30 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  12. 2026-10-29 10:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-29 10:35 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  15. 2026-10-28 11:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-28 11:49 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  18. 2026-10-27 10:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-27 10:11 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  21. 2026-10-26 11:27 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-25 22:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-25 22:56 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 14:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-25 00:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-25 00:12 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  29. 2026-10-24 01:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-24 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  32. 2026-10-23 02:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-23 02:44 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  35. 2026-10-22 04:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  37. 2026-10-21 05:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-21 05:13 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  40. 2026-10-20 06:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-20 06:30 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  43. 2026-10-19 07:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-19 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  46. 2026-10-18 08:59 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-18 03:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  49. 2026-10-17 06:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  51. 2026-10-16 07:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  53. 2026-10-15 06:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  55. 2026-10-14 01:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  57. 2026-10-12 22:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  59. 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-11 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  64. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  65. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  66. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  67. 2026-10-08 07:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-08 07:44 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  70. 2026-10-07 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-07 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-10-07 01:17 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-06 21:21 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-06 16:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-06 16:58 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-55191?
CVE-2026-55191 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 19, 2026. FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.27.0, FreeRDP clients that negotiate RDPGFX AVC444 with an H.264 decoder backend calculate the intermediate YUV444 allocation size in libfreerdp/codec/h264.c with 32-bit multiplication in avc444_ensure_buffer. A malicious…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-55191 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-55191 was published on August 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 26, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-55191 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-55191 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55191?
CVE-2026-55191 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55191?
A fix for CVE-2026-55191 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55191

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55191?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.