CVE-2026-62357

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (44th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from a secondary CVSS source
Sources: EPSS, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-60960 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Dragonfly is an in-memory data store built for modern application workloads. Prior to 1.40.0, CMS.INITBYDIM and CMS.INITBYPROB accept dimensions whose width times depth times sizeof(int64_t) overflows in src/core/cms.cc, allocating an undersized counter buffer while CMS.INCRBY and CMS.QUERY use the unbounded dimensions, which allows an unauthenticated remote client to corrupt or disclose adjacent heap memory and crash the server. This issue is fixed in version 1.40.0.

CVSS
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
71
EG Risk 71/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
44th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.a secondary CVSS source
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-08). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 18, 2026

Last Modified

October 22, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 18, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_pr, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

v1.40.0

Patch available: dragonflydb/dragonfly v1.40.0

https://github.com/dragonflydb/dragonfly/releases/tag/v1.40.0
GitHub commit

commit c004623249fe (dragonflydb/dragonfly)

Fix landed in dragonflydb/dragonfly commit c004623249fe — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/dragonflydb/dragonfly/commit/c004623249fe2151dc5d64e21364fb9fb07c90d3
GitHub pull request

fix: bound CMS dimensions to prevent heap overflow on INITBYDIM/INITBYPROB

Fix merged in dragonflydb/dragonfly PR #7647 on 2026-06-19 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/dragonflydb/dragonfly/pull/7647
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

DragonflyDB `CMS.INITBYDIM` integer overflow leads to a remote, attacker-controlled heap out-of-bounds write · Advisory · dragonflydb/dragonfly · GitHub

https://github.com/dragonflydb/dragonfly/security/advisories/GHSA-cmmv-h748-v93x

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 29× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 129 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 29 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  4. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  5. 2026-11-09 15:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  7. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  8. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  9. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  10. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  11. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  12. 2026-11-03 06:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  14. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  15. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  16. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  17. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  18. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  19. 2026-10-27 21:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  21. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  22. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  23. 2026-10-25 14:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-22 22:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-20 09:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  7. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-18 03:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  14. 2026-10-13 12:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-12 15:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-11 19:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-11 16:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-11 14:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-06 21:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  27. 2026-10-06 08:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-05 09:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  31. 2026-10-03 17:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-03 03:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  35. 2026-10-02 01:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  37. 2026-09-30 21:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  39. 2026-09-30 09:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-09-28 21:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  42. 2026-09-27 21:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-09-27 07:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  45. 2026-09-25 01:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-09-24 00:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  48. 2026-09-23 00:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-09-22 00:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-09-20 00:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-09-19 00:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  53. 2026-09-18 00:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-09-16 22:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  56. 2026-09-16 10:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  58. 2026-09-15 08:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-09-13 20:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-09-12 20:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-09-11 21:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  63. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  64. 2026-09-10 15:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-09-09 03:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  67. 2026-09-07 22:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  69. 2026-09-06 22:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  71. 2026-09-05 22:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-09-04 22:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-09-04 10:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  75. 2026-09-02 21:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-62357?
CVE-2026-62357 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 18, 2026. Dragonfly is an in-memory data store built for modern application workloads. Prior to 1.40.0, CMS.INITBYDIM and CMS.INITBYPROB accept dimensions whose width times depth times sizeof(int64_t) overflows in src/core/cms.cc, allocating an undersized counter buffer while CMS.INCRBY and CMS.QUERY use the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-62357 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-62357 was published on August 18, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 22, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-62357 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-62357 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (44th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-62357?
CVE-2026-62357 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-62357?
A fix for CVE-2026-62357 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-62357

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-62357?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.