CVE-2026-67290

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-01. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-51865 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 contains a heap out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the TSMF FFmpeg decoder when parsing AVC1 MPEG2VIDEOINFO media types with insufficient ExtraData. Attackers can send malformed media format data from a server to trigger a crash by reading fixed offsets without validating source buffer length.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.6% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
50th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-09). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 1, 2026

Last Modified

September 29, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 1, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
Web page

FreeRDP before 3.29.0 Heap Out-of-Bounds Read via TSMF | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/freerdp-before-heap-out-of-bounds-read-via-tsmf
GitHub commit

commit 8d3b86022f0d (FreeRDP/FreeRDP)

Fix landed in FreeRDP/FreeRDP commit 8d3b86022f0d — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/8d3b86022f0d71aefa7bd2e466d2d391693a41b3
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

FreeRDP TSMF AVC1/MPEG2VIDEOINFO short ExtraData causes heap out-of-bounds read · Advisory · FreeRDP/FreeRDP · GitHub

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-whq8-c3v3-p8v8

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatfreerdp-2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.162026-09-17redhat
redhatfreerdp-0:2.1.1-5.el7_9.122026-09-17redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp22.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.9.0+dfsg1-1~bpo11+1 (32 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp22.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1 (13 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp33.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.32.1+dfsg-1~bpo13+1 (49 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp33.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.28.0+dfsg-2 (37 versions)
  • every version up to 3.29.0+dfsg-1: fixed in 3.29.0+dfsg-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 293 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 193 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 00:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-10 00:46 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-10 00:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  8. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  9. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  10. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  11. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  14. 2026-11-03 09:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-03 09:54 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-03 09:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  18. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  19. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  20. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  23. 2026-10-27 19:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-27 19:01 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-27 19:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  2. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 14:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  6. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  7. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  8. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  9. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 09:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-20 09:04 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-20 09:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  13. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  14. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  15. 2026-10-18 03:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  17. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  18. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  20. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  21. 2026-10-13 10:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-13 10:49 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-13 10:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  24. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  25. 2026-10-12 15:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-11 19:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-11 16:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-11 14:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  30. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  31. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  32. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  33. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  34. 2026-10-06 23:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-06 23:49 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-06 23:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  37. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  38. 2026-10-05 19:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-05 19:53 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-05 19:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  41. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  42. 2026-10-04 23:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-04 23:50 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-04 23:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  45. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  46. 2026-10-04 06:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-04 06:26 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-04 06:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  49. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  50. 2026-10-03 02:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-03 02:46 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-03 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  53. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  54. 2026-10-02 10:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-02 10:30 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-02 10:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  57. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  58. 2026-10-01 15:42 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-01 15:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  60. 2026-10-01 02:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-01 02:43 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-01 02:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  63. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  64. 2026-09-29 16:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-09-29 16:46 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-29 16:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  67. 2026-09-29 06:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-09-29 06:47 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-29 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  70. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 47th percentile
  71. 2026-09-28 07:10 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-28 07:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  73. 2026-09-27 18:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-09-27 18:23 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-27 18:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-v8g5-qxq2-3959 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-67290?
CVE-2026-67290 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 1, 2026. FreeRDP before 3.29.0 contains a heap out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the TSMF FFmpeg decoder when parsing AVC1 MPEG2VIDEOINFO media types with insufficient ExtraData. Attackers can send malformed media format data from a server to trigger a crash by reading fixed offsets without validating…
When was CVE-2026-67290 made public?
CVE-2026-67290 was made public on July 15, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on August 1, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 29, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-67290 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-67290 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-67290?
CVE-2026-67290 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-67290?
A fix for CVE-2026-67290 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-67290 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-67290

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-67290?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.