CVE-2026-73241

HIGHNVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This high-severity CVE scores 7.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (40th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-56934 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.30.0, FreeRDP server-side RDSTLS in libfreerdp/core/rdstls.c accepts an attacker-supplied RDSTLS_TYPE_CAPABILITIES PDU while rdstls_server_authenticate is waiting for RDSTLS_TYPE_AUTHREQ, leaving resultCode at RDSTLS_RESULT_SUCCESS and allowing a remote unauthenticated client to bypass the RedirectionGuid, username, domain, or password checks. This issue is fixed in version 3.30.0.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
50
EG Risk 50/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
40th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-09). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 25, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 11, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_pr, github_commit, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

3.30.0

Patch available: FreeRDP/FreeRDP 3.30.0

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/releases/tag/3.30.0
GitHub commit

commit b05a9510787c (FreeRDP/FreeRDP)

Fix landed in FreeRDP/FreeRDP commit b05a9510787c — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/b05a9510787c83c87ffc5fa8d7cc9f06ed971695
GitHub pull request

Sdl clipbaord and bounds checks

Fix merged in FreeRDP/FreeRDP PR #13065 on 2026-07-15 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/pull/13065
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

RDSTLS server authentication bypass: a credential-less Capabilities PDU is accepted at the auth step (fail-open `resultCode`) · Advisory · FreeRDP/FreeRDP · GitHub

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-rqgv-grx4-xm6x

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-73241(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatfreerdp-2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.162026-09-17redhat
redhatfreerdp-2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.102026-08-31redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp22.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1 (13 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp33.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.32.0+dfsg-1 (47 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp33.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.30.0+dfsg-1~bpo13+1 (39 versions)
  • every version up to 3.30.0+dfsg-1: fixed in 3.30.0+dfsg-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 215 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 115 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 04:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  6. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  7. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  8. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  9. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  10. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  11. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  12. 2026-11-03 11:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-03 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  15. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  16. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  17. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  18. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  19. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  20. 2026-10-27 19:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-27 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  23. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  24. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 14:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  2. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  3. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  4. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  5. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  6. 2026-10-20 08:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-10-20 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  9. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  10. 2026-10-18 03:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  12. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 39th percentile
  13. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  14. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  15. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  16. 2026-10-13 07:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-13 07:58 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  19. 2026-10-12 15:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-11 19:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-11 16:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-11 14:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  24. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  25. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  26. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  27. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  28. 2026-10-07 05:27 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-06 17:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-06 17:36 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  32. 2026-10-05 17:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-05 17:45 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  35. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  36. 2026-10-04 22:34 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-04 08:17 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-03 20:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-03 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  41. 2026-10-02 22:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-02 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-02 08:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-02 08:25 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  46. 2026-10-01 09:57 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-30 22:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-09-30 22:01 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  50. 2026-09-29 04:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-09-29 04:58 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-28 13:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-09-28 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 38th percentile
  55. 2026-09-28 02:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-09-28 02:03 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  58. 2026-09-27 10:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-09-27 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 37th percentile
  61. 2026-09-25 15:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored▼ 0.80
  62. 2026-09-25 15:26 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-25 15:23 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 7.5
  64. 2026-09-25 03:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-09-25 03:45 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-24 12:03 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-24 00:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-09-24 00:13 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 32nd percentile
  70. 2026-09-23 12:13 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-09-23 00:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-09-23 00:22 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-22 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-09-22 00:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-22 00:33 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-73241?
CVE-2026-73241 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 11, 2026. FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.30.0, FreeRDP server-side RDSTLS in libfreerdp/core/rdstls.c accepts an attacker-supplied RDSTLS_TYPE_CAPABILITIES PDU while rdstls_server_authenticate is waiting for RDSTLS_TYPE_AUTHREQ, leaving resultCode at…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-73241 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-73241 was published on August 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 25, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-73241 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-73241 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (40th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-73241?
CVE-2026-73241 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-73241?
A fix for CVE-2026-73241 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-73241 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-73241

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-73241?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.