CVE-2026-63633

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-62672 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.28.0, freerdp_dsp_decode_opus in libfreerdp/codec/dsp.c calls Stream_EnsureRemainingCapacity on context->common.buffer even though opus_decode writes decoded PCM into the caller-supplied out stream. A malicious RDP server that negotiates WAVE_FORMAT_OPUS with a client built with WITH_OPUS enabled and WITH_DSP_FFMPEG disabled can make libopus write a large decoded frame beyond the 4096-byte StreamPool_Take destination used by channels/rdpsnd/client/rdpsnd_main.c. This can corrupt the client heap, crash the client, and may permit code execution. This issue is fixed in version 3.28.0.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
60
EG Risk 60/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
50th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 26, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Nov 2, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github_release, github, github_commit, github_pr.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)🟡 PoC Available

Heap buffer overflow in FreeRDP Opus audio decode (`freerdp_dsp_decode_opus` resizes the wrong stream) — server→client · Advisory · FreeRDP/FreeRDP · GitHub

Affected: 3.24.0) — that fix did not touch

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/security/advisories/GHSA-72j9-356v-88xq
GitHub release Patch Available

3.28.0

Patch available: FreeRDP/FreeRDP 3.28.0

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/releases/tag/3.28.0
GitHub pull request

Range checks

Fix merged in FreeRDP/FreeRDP PR #12993 on 2026-07-02 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/pull/12993
GitHub commit

commit 0ed1f95d3691 (FreeRDP/FreeRDP)

Fix landed in FreeRDP/FreeRDP commit 0ed1f95d3691 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP/commit/0ed1f95d36913581cf31124f94eb5843d4263eae

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63633(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatfreerdp-2:3.10.3-3.el10_0.162026-09-17redhat
redhatfreerdp-2:3.10.3-12.el10_2.102026-08-31redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp22.10.0+dfsg1-1 ... 2.11.7+dfsg1-6~deb12u1 (13 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp33.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.32.2+dfsg-1 (50 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
freerdp33.15.0+dfsg-2.1 ... 3.27.1+dfsg-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 3.28.0+dfsg-1: fixed in 3.28.0+dfsg-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 63× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 293 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 193 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 14:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 14:23 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 14:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 14:15 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 14:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-11 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  11. 2026-11-10 14:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-10 14:08 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  14. 2026-11-09 14:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-09 14:03 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  17. 2026-11-08 14:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-08 14:01 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  20. 2026-11-07 13:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-07 13:57 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  23. 2026-11-06 14:55 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-11-06 13:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-06 13:54 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  2. 2026-11-05 13:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-05 13:51 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  5. 2026-11-04 13:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-04 13:48 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  8. 2026-11-03 13:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-03 13:45 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  11. 2026-11-02 13:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-02 13:27 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  14. 2026-11-01 13:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-01 13:23 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  17. 2026-10-31 13:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-31 13:20 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  20. 2026-10-30 13:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-30 13:17 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  23. 2026-10-29 13:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-29 13:14 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  26. 2026-10-28 13:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-28 13:08 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  29. 2026-10-27 13:05 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-27 11:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-27 11:30 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  33. 2026-10-26 11:27 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-26 09:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-26 09:20 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  37. 2026-10-25 14:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-25 09:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-25 09:18 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  41. 2026-10-24 09:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-24 09:15 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  44. 2026-10-23 09:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-23 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  47. 2026-10-22 09:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-22 09:07 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  50. 2026-10-21 09:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-21 09:03 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  53. 2026-10-20 09:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-20 09:00 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  56. 2026-10-19 08:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-19 08:55 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  59. 2026-10-18 08:50 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-18 03:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  62. 2026-10-17 07:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-17 07:21 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  65. 2026-10-16 07:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-16 07:17 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  68. 2026-10-15 06:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-15 06:13 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  71. 2026-10-14 01:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-14 01:49 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  74. 2026-10-12 22:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-12 22:02 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63633?
CVE-2026-63633 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 19, 2026. FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to 3.28.0, freerdp_dsp_decode_opus in libfreerdp/codec/dsp.c calls Stream_EnsureRemainingCapacity on context->common.buffer even though opus_decode writes decoded PCM into the caller-supplied out stream. A malicious RDP server…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-63633 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-63633 was published on August 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 26, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-63633 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63633 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (50th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63633?
CVE-2026-63633 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63633?
A fix for CVE-2026-63633 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-63633 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63633

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63633?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.