CVE-2026-55209

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-18. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-77802 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2026-3694 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.8%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

resdata is software for reading and writing result files from the Eclipse reservoir simulator. Prior to 6.2.9, resdata insufficiently validates numeric fields, grid dimensions, keyword sizes, and array indexes while parsing untrusted GRDECL files in lib/resdata/rd_kw_grdecl.cpp and lib/resdata/rd_grid.cpp. Malformed COORD, ZCORN, CORSNUM, ACTNUM, or MAPAXES data can reach rd_grid_alloc_GRDECL_kw__ with inconsistent lengths, while unbounded floating-point conversion can exceed the intended parser buffer. In a network service that accepts untrusted GRDECL files, these conditions can cause a classic buffer overflow, out-of-bounds reads, invalid array access, NULL pointer dereference, memory corruption, or service termination. This issue is fixed in version 6.2.9.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
59
EG Risk 59/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.8% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.8%
EPSS %ILE
56th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.8% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 18, 2026

Last Modified

September 30, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Nov 8, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit, github_pr, github_release.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow'), Improper Validation of Array Index, NULL Pointer Dereference and Out-of-bounds Read in resdata · Advisory · equinor/resdata · GitHub

https://github.com/equinor/resdata/security/advisories/GHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x
GitHub release Patch Available

6.2.9

Patch available: equinor/resdata 6.2.9

https://github.com/equinor/resdata/releases/tag/6.2.9
GitHub pull request Patch Available

Backport to 6.2

Patch available: equinor/resdata 6.2.9 (PR #1166 merged 2026-05-18)

https://github.com/equinor/resdata/pull/1166
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit ee8cc12b026d (equinor/resdata)

Patch available: equinor/resdata 6.2.9 (contains commit ee8cc12b026d)

https://github.com/equinor/resdata/commit/ee8cc12b026d945df3077bc98e211ee45f80a433
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit d3f45828e941 (equinor/resdata)

Patch available: equinor/resdata 6.2.9 (contains commit d3f45828e941)

https://github.com/equinor/resdata/commit/d3f45828e9413506b8e8160a9304f4b7b06dcefc
GitHub commit Patch Available

commit 9f8fd6db472e (equinor/resdata)

Patch available: equinor/resdata 6.2.9 (contains commit 9f8fd6db472e)

https://github.com/equinor/resdata/commit/9f8fd6db472e0696080b768389914d60a453904f

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-55209(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
pipresdata @ 6.2.9 (fixes < 6.2.9)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
resdata3.0.1 ... 6.2.8 (29 versions)
  • every version up to 6.2.9: fixed in 6.2.9
—

Weakness Classification(4)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 127 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 27 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 19:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 19:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 19:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 19:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-10 19:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  10. 2026-11-09 18:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-09 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  13. 2026-11-08 18:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-08 18:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  16. 2026-11-07 18:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-07 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  18. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  19. 2026-11-06 17:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-06 17:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  22. 2026-11-06 12:25 UTCOSV refresh
  23. 2026-11-05 17:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-05 17:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-04 17:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-04 17:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  4. 2026-11-03 17:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-03 17:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  7. 2026-11-02 16:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  10. 2026-11-01 16:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-01 07:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pr85-w493-9w3x · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-01 07:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  14. 2026-10-31 15:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  16. 2026-10-30 15:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  18. 2026-10-29 15:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  20. 2026-10-28 14:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  22. 2026-10-27 14:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  24. 2026-10-26 13:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  26. 2026-10-25 14:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-25 13:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  29. 2026-10-24 12:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  31. 2026-10-23 12:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  33. 2026-10-22 12:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  35. 2026-10-21 11:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  37. 2026-10-20 11:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  39. 2026-10-19 11:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  41. 2026-10-18 03:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  43. 2026-10-17 07:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  45. 2026-10-16 07:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  47. 2026-10-15 06:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  49. 2026-10-14 01:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  51. 2026-10-12 22:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  53. 2026-10-12 15:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-11 19:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-11 16:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-11 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  58. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  59. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  60. 2026-10-08 17:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  61. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  62. 2026-10-06 17:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  64. 2026-10-06 08:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  66. 2026-10-05 01:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  68. 2026-10-03 17:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  70. 2026-10-02 19:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  72. 2026-10-02 01:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  74. 2026-09-30 18:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-55209?
CVE-2026-55209 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 18, 2026. resdata is software for reading and writing result files from the Eclipse reservoir simulator. Prior to 6.2.9, resdata insufficiently validates numeric fields, grid dimensions, keyword sizes, and array indexes while parsing untrusted GRDECL files in lib/resdata/rd_kw_grdecl.cpp and…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-55209 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-55209 was published on August 18, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 30, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-55209 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-55209 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.8% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (56th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-55209?
CVE-2026-55209 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-55209?
A fix for CVE-2026-55209 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-55209 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-55209

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-55209?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.