CVE-2026-63076

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-25. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — Patch released this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP password based protection verification only checks whether the protectionAlg parameter was not NULL and not its ASN.1 type, before treating it as a PBMParameter. A crafted message can contain a parameter of a different type, which is then dereferenced as an invalid pointer.

Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated attacker can crash an application acting as a CMP server that accepts PBM-protected messages, or a CMP client talking to a malicious or intercepted CMP server, resulting in a Denial of Service.

CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference

Description: When verifying the password-based MAC protection of a CMP message, OpenSSL library reads the protectionAlg algorithm parameter with X509_ALGOR_get0(), which returns both the parameter type and its value pointer. The value is then cast to an ASN1_STRING and treated as the expected PBMParameter after only checking that pointer is not NULL. The parameter type returned by X509_ALGOR_get0() was never consulted.

This happens during protection verification, before any MAC is computed, so no knowledge of the PBM shared secret is required; the only precondition is that PBM verification is reachable. On the server side this is reached from OSSL_CMP_SRV_process_request() for any application that stands up a CMP server accepting PBM-protected messages, and on the client side from CMP response validation against a malicious or on-path (MITM) server. The reliable consequence is a denial of service; there is no memory disclosure, no controlled memory write, and no path to code execution. CMP is a specialized feature that an application must explicitly enable.

FIPS impact: no As the CMP code lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(high)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
70%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 11, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit.
github_commit

commit 37882aa2e025 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 37882aa2e025 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/37882aa2e0256e1072442a8f62f7db45b995c45b
github_commit

commit a1f348ccb328 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit a1f348ccb328 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a1f348ccb328c3afbd4ba6883f9b7c813c043259
github_commit

commit a17cc8d612ec (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit a17cc8d612ec — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a17cc8d612ecff6d94a9b7ca8b5283ddf5ff570e

Patch Availability(5)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopenssl-provider-legacy (3.5.5-1ubuntu3.4) @ resolute2026-09-18ubuntu
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.8-1.el10_22026-09-14redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.8-1.el9_82026-09-14redhat
redhatopenssl3-main-3.5.8-0.1.hum12026-08-25redhat
redhatopenssl-main-3.5.8-0.1.hum12026-08-25redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 6 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.8-r0
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.8-r0
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.8-r0
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.0.10-1 ... 4.0.2-1 (86 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.1-1 ... 3.5.7-1~deb13u1 (13 versions)3.5.7-1~deb13u2
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.1-1 ... 4.0.2-1 (28 versions)

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 39× in last 7d / 148× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 148 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 22:42 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-18 22:42 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-18 22:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-18 11:31 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-18 11:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-18 00:19 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-18 00:19 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-18 00:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-17 13:08 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-17 13:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-17 01:26 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-17 01:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-16 14:14 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-16 14:14 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-16 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-16 02:22 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-16 02:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-15 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-15 15:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-15 03:44 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-15 03:44 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-15 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-14 16:33 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-09-14 16:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-14 05:21 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-14 05:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-13 18:10 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-13 18:10 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-13 18:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-13 06:58 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-13 06:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-12 19:47 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-12 19:47 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-12 19:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-12 08:36 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-12 08:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-11 21:24 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-11 21:24 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-11 21:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-11 10:58 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-11 10:58 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-11 10:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-10 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-10 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-10 12:02 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-10 12:02 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-10 12:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-10 00:18 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-10 00:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-09 12:26 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-09-09 12:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-09 01:15 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-09 01:15 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-09 01:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-09-08 03:11 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-08 03:11 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-08 03:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-09-07 15:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-09-07 04:48 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-07 04:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-06 17:36 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-09-06 17:36 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-06 17:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-09-06 06:24 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-06 06:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-05 19:11 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-05 19:11 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-05 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-09-05 08:00 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-05 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-09-04 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-04 20:49 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-04 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-09-04 09:26 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-04 09:26 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-04 09:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-09-03 22:14 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-03 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-09-03 10:52 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-03 10:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-09-02 23:36 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-02 23:36 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-02 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-09-02 12:22 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-02 12:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-09-02 01:11 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-09-02 01:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-09-01 13:56 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63076?
CVE-2026-63076 is a high vulnerability published on August 25, 2026. Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP password based protection verification only checks whether the protectionAlg parameter was not NULL and not its ASN.1 type, before treating it as a PBMParameter. A crafted message can contain a parameter of a different type, which is then dereferenced as an invalid…
When was CVE-2026-63076 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63076 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 25, 2026, with the most recent update on September 11, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63076 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63076 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 29.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63076?
CVE-2026-63076 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63076?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63076, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63076

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63076?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.