CVE-2026-14457

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-25. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asEUVD-2026-65479 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.2%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.

Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.

CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference

Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).

When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.

Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.

FIPS impact: no

No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation1.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.2%
EPSS %ILE
67th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
1.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 11, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit dad836b071da (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit dad836b071da — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/dad836b071da6579510c968615848ba03cac593b
GitHub commit

commit d0af20478688 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit d0af20478688 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d0af20478688a6aa2f59d61caa3f82136b181d7f
GitHub commit

commit 581aaa0f0a35 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 581aaa0f0a35 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/581aaa0f0a35d214740f0fe1f5283ec41f1212e1
GitHub commit

commit 1e8c398db674 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit 1e8c398db674 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1e8c398db67404babd3e5af999bb6bd86f720c76

Patch Availability(13)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopenssl-provider-legacy (3.5.5-1ubuntu3.4) @ resolute2026-10-27ubuntu
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:17902724262026-09-28redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-istio-csr-rhel9:17905899142026-09-28redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-operator-rhel9:17905898552026-09-28redhat
redhatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:17905899122026-09-28redhat
redhatcert-manager/cert-manager-istio-csr-rhel9:17902237192026-09-28redhat
redhatcert-manager/jetstack-cert-manager-rhel9:17902232792026-09-28redhat
redhatrhui5/rhua-rhel9:17902420042026-09-24redhat
redhatrhui5/installer-rhel9:17894829612026-09-16redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.8-1.el10_22026-09-14redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.8-1.el9_82026-09-14redhat
redhatopenssl3-main-3.5.8-0.1.hum12026-08-25redhat
redhatopenssl-main-3.5.8-0.1.hum12026-08-25redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 3.4.0 up to 3.5.8-r0: fixed in 3.5.8-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 3.4.0 up to 3.5.8-r0: fixed in 3.5.8-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl—
  • 3.4.0 up to 3.5.8-r0: fixed in 3.5.8-r0
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl3.5.1-1 ... 3.5.7-1~deb13u1 (13 versions)
  • every version up to 3.5.7-1~deb13u2: fixed in 3.5.7-1~deb13u2
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
openssl3.5.1-1 ... 3.6.3-1 (23 versions)
  • every version up to 3.6.4-1: fixed in 3.6.4-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 38× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 296 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 196 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 13:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 13:36 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-11 13:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-11-10 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  8. 2026-11-09 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  9. 2026-11-08 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  10. 2026-11-07 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  11. 2026-11-06 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  12. 2026-11-05 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  13. 2026-11-04 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  14. 2026-11-04 00:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-04 00:21 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-04 00:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-11-03 16:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  18. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  19. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  20. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  21. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  22. 2026-10-29 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  23. 2026-10-28 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  24. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  25. 2026-10-27 11:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-27 11:07 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-27 11:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  3. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  5. 2026-10-25 14:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  7. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.2% · 67th percentile
  8. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-21 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-18 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-18 05:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-17 18:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-17 18:23 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-17 18:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-16 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-15 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-14 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-13 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-11 20:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-11 18:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-11 14:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  28. 2026-10-10 19:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-10 12:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-10 12:14 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-10 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  32. 2026-10-09 20:06 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-09 04:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-09 04:29 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-09 04:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  36. 2026-10-08 17:11 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  37. 2026-10-08 03:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-08 03:19 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-08 03:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  40. 2026-10-07 23:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  41. 2026-10-06 23:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-06 23:45 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-06 23:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  44. 2026-10-06 15:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  45. 2026-10-06 11:13 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-06 11:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  47. 2026-10-05 20:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-05 20:56 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-05 20:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  50. 2026-10-05 17:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  51. 2026-10-05 08:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-05 08:23 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-05 08:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  54. 2026-10-04 23:21 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  55. 2026-10-04 19:50 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-04 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  57. 2026-10-04 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-04 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  59. 2026-10-03 16:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-03 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-03 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  62. 2026-10-03 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  63. 2026-10-02 22:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-02 22:27 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-02 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  66. 2026-10-02 09:55 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-02 09:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  68. 2026-10-01 21:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-01 21:22 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-01 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  71. 2026-10-01 19:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 62nd percentile
  72. 2026-10-01 08:47 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-01 08:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  74. 2026-09-30 20:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-30 20:15 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-14457?
CVE-2026-14457 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 25, 2026. Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted…
When was CVE-2026-14457 made public?
CVE-2026-14457 was made public on August 25, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, OpenSSL Software Foundation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on August 25, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 11, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-14457 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-14457 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (67th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-14457?
CVE-2026-14457 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-14457?
A fix for CVE-2026-14457 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-14457 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-14457

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-14457?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.