Libevent is an event notification library. Prior to 2.1.13 and 2.2.2-alpha, libevent has two HTTP parsing weaknesses in http.c. evhttp_decode_uri_internal decodes percent-encoded %00 bytes into literal NUL characters, which can cause downstream C string operations to truncate a path and bypass validation performed on a different representation. evhttp_header_is_valid_value also accepts obsolete line folding in header values containing carriage return or line feed characters, allowing a proxy and libevent to interpret headers differently and enabling header injection or access control bypass. The CRLF header acceptance is fixed in versions 2.1.13 and 2.2.2-alpha, but the reviewed patches do not clearly remediate the URI NUL-truncation condition.
CVE-2026-63385
This critical-severity CVE scores 9.2 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 66% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 9.2
- EG Score
- 9.2(medium)
- EG Risk
- 42(Track)EG Risk 42/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity92% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 34%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 20, 2026
Last Modified
September 9, 2026
Advisory Details (5)
Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026HTTP header handling bugs create risk of access control bypass. · Advisory · libevent/libevent · GitHub
https://github.com/libevent/libevent/security/advisories/GHSA-jcwh-pvf2-73p2Libevent 2.2.2-alpha
Patch available: libevent/libevent release-2.2.2-alpha
https://github.com/libevent/libevent/releases/tag/release-2.2.2-alphaLibevent 2.1.13-stable
Patch available: libevent/libevent release-2.1.13-stable
https://github.com/libevent/libevent/releases/tag/release-2.1.13-stablecommit 9170dd35e647 (libevent/libevent)
Patch available: libevent/libevent release-2.1.13-stable (contains commit 9170dd35e647)
https://github.com/libevent/libevent/commit/9170dd35e64714613e8d13b290587cfc28e258e2commit 758be0c0f69c (libevent/libevent)
Patch available: libevent/libevent release-2.2.2-alpha (contains commit 758be0c0f69c)
https://github.com/libevent/libevent/commit/758be0c0f69c1934ef9a84ab39e9f9e5fde2e6d0Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63385(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Patch Availability(5)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | libevent-pthreads-2.1-7t64 (2.1.12-stable-10ubuntu0.1) @ resolute | 2026-09-19 | ubuntu |
| redhat | libevent-0:2.1.13-1.el10_2 | 2026-09-16 | redhat |
| redhat | libevent-0:2.1.8-11.el8_10 | 2026-09-16 | redhat |
| redhat | libevent-0:2.1.13-1.el9_8 | 2026-09-16 | redhat |
| redhat | libevent-main-2.1.13-0.1.hum1 | 2026-09-03 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| libevent | 2.1.12-stable-10 ... 2.1.13-stable-1 (7 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| libevent | 2.1.12-stable-10, 2.1.13-stable-1 | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| libevent | 2.1.12-stable-10 | 2.1.13-stable-1 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(4)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 52× in last 7d / 143× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 143 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-09-19 14:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 10:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 05:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-19 01:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 21:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 21:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 16:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 12:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 08:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 05:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 01:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 21:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 21:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 15:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 11:39 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 07:43 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 03:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 23:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 20:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 15:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 15:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 11:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 07:25 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-16 07:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 23:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 19:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 15:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 11:28 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 03:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 03:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 23:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 19:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 15:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 11:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 07:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 03:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 23:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 20:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 16:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 12:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 08:23 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 04:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 00:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 16:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 16:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 12:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 09:05 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 05:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 01:20 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 17:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 13:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 13:27 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 05:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 01:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 21:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 18:00 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 14:07 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 10:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 10:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 06:19 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 02:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 22:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 18:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 14:24 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 09:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 01:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 07:36 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 03:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 23:49 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 19:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 16:03 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 12:10 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 03:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 00:04 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 16:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 16:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 12:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 08:16 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 04:21 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 00:29 UTCVendor advisory
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-63385?
When was CVE-2026-63385 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-63385 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63385?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63385?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63385
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63385?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.