In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.25.0 up to and including 1.25.1, a fix that makes the 'respip' and 'dns64' modules work together, creates a shallow copy of the view name in effect that could lead to memory corruption if the owner of the original view name is jostled out when Unbound is under pressure. Unbound needs to be configured with one of 'respip'/'rpz' modules, together with a module that can attach subqueries (respip CNAME redirection, dns64, subnetcache) and a configured 'access-control-view' while Unbound is under pressure so that joslte logic kicks in and starts dropping slow queries. The subquery is getting a shallow copy of the view name and if the super query which owns the view name is jostled out, memory corruption can occur. Likelihood of a crash is low, since it relies heavily on the underlying memory allocator and the memory layout. Debug memory builds (e.g., ASAN) that catch the free terminate the server.
CVE-2026-52863
Score 5.9 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-22. a secondary CVSS source baseline 5.9; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 5.9
- EG Score
- 5.9(high)
- EG Risk
- 42(Track)EG Risk 42/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity59% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 15%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 22, 2026
Last Modified
July 24, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Jul 22, 2026Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-52863(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 17× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-27 01:56 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-27 01:56 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-27 01:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 03:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 03:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 15:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 15:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 13:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 13:17 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-52863?
When was CVE-2026-52863 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-52863 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-52863?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-52863?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-52863
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-52863?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.