In NLnet Labs Unbound 1.4.22 up to and including 1.25.1, UDP source port is randomized and intended to serve as a secret value that increases the entropy of DNS transactions. When resolver load balancing policies depend on the source port while their outcome is revealed this secrecy is undermined. The vulnerability arises when the load balancing policy is consistent with respect to the incoming source UDP port and IP address while heavily depending on the incoming source UDP port as a randomization source. When the SO_REUSEPORT configuration option is enabled ('so-reuseport: yes') in Unbound (by default), it meets these conditions, making it vulnerable for DNS cache poisoning attacks. Upon startup, Unbound randomly partitions the available UDP source port space into disjoint subsets of (almost) equal size, assigning each subset to a specific worker thread. When an incoming DNS query is received, the kernel’s SO_REUSEPORT load balancing mechanism deterministically assigns the query to a socket associated with a particular thread. All outgoing DNS queries generated during the resolution of that request use source ports selected exclusively from the port subset assigned to the corresponding thread. Since these port subsets are disjoint across threads, the source port observed in a resolver’s outgoing query to an authoritative name server serves as a reliable indicator of the worker thread that processed the original client query. A malicious actor can acquire the mapping between incoming UDP source ports (for a given fixed source IP address) and Unbound worker threads and leverage it to conduct DNS cache poisoning attacks by effectively lowering the random port population per thread.
CVE-2026-50252
Score 9.3 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-07-22. NVD baseline CVSS 9.3; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 9.3
- EG Score
- 9.3(high)
- EG Risk
- 42(Track)EG Risk 42/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity93% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 4%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
July 22, 2026
Last Modified
July 24, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Jul 22, 2026Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-50252(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 43× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-07-27 07:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-27 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-27 03:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-27 03:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 22:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 18:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 18:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-26 14:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-26 14:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 14:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 09:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 09:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-26 03:29 UTCEG score recompute▲ 3.60
- 2026-07-26 03:29 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-07-26 03:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-24 14:12 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 9.3 · severity → CRITICAL
- 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-07-23 03:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 22:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 18 moreShow fewer
- 2026-07-22 17:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 17:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 16:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 16:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 16:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 15:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 15:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 15:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 15:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 15:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 15:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 15:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 15:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 15:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 15:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-07-22 13:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-07-22 13:17 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-50252?
When was CVE-2026-50252 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-50252 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-50252?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-50252?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-50252
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-50252?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.