CVE-2026-40682

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-05-04. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asEUVD-2026-27003 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

XML External Entity (XXE) via Unsanitized Dictionary Parsing in Apache OpenNLP DictionaryEntryPersistor

Versions Affected: before 2.5.9, before 3.0.0-M3

Description: The DictionaryEntryPersistor class initializes a static SAXParserFactory at class-load time without enabling FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING or disabling DTD processing. When create(InputStream, EntryInserter) is invoked, the only feature set on the XMLReader is namespace support — external entity resolution and DOCTYPE declarations remain fully enabled. An attacker who can supply a crafted dictionary file (e.g., a stop-word list or domain dictionary) containing a malicious DOCTYPE declaration can trigger local file disclosure via file:// entity references or server-side request forgery via http:// entity references during SAX parsing, before the application processes a single dictionary entry. This is inconsistent with the project's own XmlUtil.createSaxParser() helper, which correctly sets FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING and disallow-doctype-decl and is used by all other XML parsing paths in the codebase. The public Dictionary(InputStream) constructor delegates directly to this method and is the documented API for loading user-supplied dictionaries, making untrusted input a realistic scenario.

Mitigation: 2.x users should upgrade to 2.5.9. 3.x users should upgrade to 3.0.0-M3. Users who cannot upgrade immediately should ensure that all dictionary files are sourced from trusted origins and should consider wrapping the Dictionary(InputStream) constructor with input validation that rejects any XML containing a DOCTYPE declaration before it reaches the parser.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
56
EG Risk 56/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
43rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 4, 2026

Last Modified

October 26, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red Hat

2466484 – (CVE-2026-40682) CVE-2026-40682 org.apache.opennlp/opennlp-tools: Apache OpenNLP: XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability via crafted dictionary parsing

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2466484
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-40682 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-40682
Web page

oss-security - CVE-2026-40682: Apache OpenNLP: XXE via Dictionary Parsing in DictionaryEntryPersistor

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/19

Patch Availability(5)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhoai/odh-trustyai-service-rhel9:17909330942026-10-21redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-trustyai-service-rhel9:17917925252026-10-19redhat
mavenorg.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools @ 2.5.9 (fixes >= 2.0.0, < 2.5.9)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools @ 1.9.5 (fixes < 1.9.5)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools @ 3.0.0-M3 (fixes >= 3.0.0-M1, < 3.0.0-M3)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-opennlp1.9.3-1 ... 2.5.9-1 (18 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-opennlp2.1.0-1 ... 2.5.9-1 (15 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-opennlp2.5.12-1, 2.5.3-1, 2.5.9-1
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-opennlp2.5.3-1
  • every version up to 2.5.9-1: fixed in 2.5.9-1
—
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools1.5.1-incubating ... 1.9.4 (17 versions)
  • 2.0.0 up to 2.5.9: fixed in 2.5.9
  • 3.0.0-M1 up to 3.0.0-M3: fixed in 3.0.0-M3
  • every version up to 1.9.5: fixed in 1.9.5
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 68× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 287 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 187 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 06:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 06:48 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-13 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  4. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 06:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 06:09 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-12 06:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  8. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  9. 2026-11-11 05:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-11 05:29 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-11 05:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  12. 2026-11-10 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  13. 2026-11-10 04:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-10 04:49 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-10 04:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  16. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  17. 2026-11-09 04:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-09 04:11 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-09 04:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  20. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  21. 2026-11-08 03:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-08 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-08 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  24. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  25. 2026-11-07 02:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 02:47 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-07 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  3. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  4. 2026-11-06 07:55 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-11-06 02:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-06 02:08 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-06 02:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  8. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  9. 2026-11-05 01:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-05 01:29 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-05 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  12. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  13. 2026-11-04 00:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-04 00:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  15. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  16. 2026-11-03 00:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-03 00:12 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-03 00:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  19. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  20. 2026-11-01 23:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-01 23:32 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-01 23:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  23. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  24. 2026-11-01 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4v8g-86x5-3vrc · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  25. 2026-11-01 07:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-31 22:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-31 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-30 22:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-30 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  32. 2026-10-29 21:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-29 21:25 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  35. 2026-10-28 20:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-28 20:46 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  38. 2026-10-27 20:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-27 20:04 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-27 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  41. 2026-10-26 19:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-26 19:26 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  44. 2026-10-26 01:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-26 01:11 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-25 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  47. 2026-10-25 14:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-25 00:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-25 00:32 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-24 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  51. 2026-10-23 23:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-23 23:53 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  54. 2026-10-22 23:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-22 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  57. 2026-10-21 22:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-21 22:35 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  60. 2026-10-20 21:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-20 21:57 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  63. 2026-10-19 21:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-19 21:18 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  66. 2026-10-18 20:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  68. 2026-10-18 03:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-17 19:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  71. 2026-10-16 18:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-16 16:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  73. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  74. 2026-10-15 16:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-40682?
CVE-2026-40682 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 4, 2026. XML External Entity (XXE) via Unsanitized Dictionary Parsing in Apache OpenNLP DictionaryEntryPersistor Versions Affected: before 2.5.9, before 3.0.0-M3 Description: The DictionaryEntryPersistor class initializes a static SAXParserFactory at class-load time without enabling…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-40682 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-40682 was published on May 4, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 26, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-40682 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-40682 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (43rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-40682?
CVE-2026-40682 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.1 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-40682?
A fix for CVE-2026-40682 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-40682 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-40682

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-40682?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.