CVE-2026-42027

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-05-04. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asEUVD-2026-27005 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Arbitrary Class Instantiation via Model Manifest in Apache OpenNLP ExtensionLoader

Versions Affected: before 1.9.5, before 2.5.9, before 3.0.0-M3

Description: 

The ExtensionLoader.instantiateExtension(Class, String) method loads a class by its fully-qualified name via Class.forName() and invokes its no-arg constructor, with the class name sourced from the manifest.properties entry of a model archive. The existing isAssignableFrom check correctly rejects classes that are not subtypes of the expected extension interface (BaseToolFactory for factory=, ArtifactSerializer for serializer-class-*), but the check runs after Class.forName() has already loaded and initialized the named class.

Class.forName() with default initialization semantics executes the target class's static initializer before returning, so an attacker who can supply a crafted model archive can cause the static initializer of any class on the classpath to run during model loading, regardless of whether that class passes the subsequent type check.

Exploitation requires a class with attacker-useful side effects in its static initializer (for example, JNDI lookup, outbound network I/O, or filesystem access) to be present on the classpath, so this is not a drop-in remote code execution; however, the attack surface grows as third-party model distribution becomes more common (community model repositories, Hugging Face-style sharing), where users routinely load model files from origins they do not control. A secondary, narrower vector affects deployments that ship legitimate BaseToolFactory or ArtifactSerializer subclasses with side-effecting no-arg constructors: a malicious manifest can name such a class and force its constructor to run during model load.

Mitigation: 

* 2.x users should upgrade to 2.5.9. * 3.x users should upgrade to 3.0.0-M3.

Note: The fix introduces a package-prefix allowlist that is consulted before Class.forName() is invoked, so the static initializer of a disallowed class is never executed. Classes under the opennlp. prefix remain permitted by default. Deployments that load models referencing factories or serializers outside opennlp.* must opt those packages in, either programmatically via ExtensionLoader.registerAllowedPackage(String) before the first model load, or by setting the OPENNLP_EXT_ALLOWED_PACKAGES system property to a comma-separated list of allowed package prefixes.

Users who cannot upgrade immediately should ensure that all model files are sourced from trusted origins and should audit their classpath for classes with side-effecting static initializers or constructors, particularly any that perform JNDI lookups, network requests, or filesystem operations during class initialization.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
59
EG Risk 59/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
53rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 4, 2026

Last Modified

October 26, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Nov 2, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Red Hat

2466527 – (CVE-2026-42027) CVE-2026-42027 Apache OpenNLP: Apache OpenNLP: Arbitrary Class Loading via Model Manifest

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2466527
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-42027 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42027
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:65126
Web page

oss-security - CVE-2026-42027: Apache OpenNLP: Arbitrary Class Instantiation via Model Manifest in ExtensionLoader

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/01/20

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-42027(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhoai/odh-trustyai-service-rhel9:17881986812026-09-08redhat
mavenorg.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools @ 3.0.0-M3 (fixes >= 3.0.0-M1, < 3.0.0-M3)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools @ 2.5.9 (fixes >= 2.0.0, < 2.5.9)—ghsa
mavenorg.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools @ 1.9.5 (fixes < 1.9.5)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-opennlp1.9.3-1 ... 2.5.9-1 (18 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-opennlp2.1.0-1 ... 2.5.9-1 (15 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-opennlp2.5.12-1, 2.5.3-1, 2.5.9-1
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
apache-opennlp2.5.3-1
  • every version up to 2.5.9-1: fixed in 2.5.9-1
—
Maven(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
org.apache.opennlp:opennlp-tools1.5.1-incubating ... 1.9.4 (17 versions)
  • 2.0.0 up to 2.5.9: fixed in 2.5.9
  • 3.0.0-M1 up to 3.0.0-M3: fixed in 3.0.0-M3
  • every version up to 1.9.5: fixed in 1.9.5
—

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 73× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 289 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 189 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 01:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 01:41 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-13 01:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  5. 2026-11-12 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  6. 2026-11-12 01:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-12 01:19 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-12 01:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-11 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  10. 2026-11-11 00:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-11 00:53 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-11 00:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  14. 2026-11-10 00:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-10 00:32 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-10 00:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  18. 2026-11-09 00:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-09 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-09 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  22. 2026-11-07 23:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-07 23:49 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-07 23:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 23:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-06 23:27 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-06 23:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-06 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-06 08:25 UTCOSV refresh
  6. 2026-11-05 23:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-05 23:05 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-05 23:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-05 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  10. 2026-11-04 22:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-04 22:44 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-04 22:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  13. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  14. 2026-11-03 22:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-03 22:22 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-03 22:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  18. 2026-11-02 21:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-02 21:55 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-02 21:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-02 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  22. 2026-11-01 21:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-01 21:33 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-01 21:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  26. 2026-11-01 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cx4m-2p55-rw7j · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-11-01 07:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-31 21:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-31 21:12 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-31 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  31. 2026-10-30 20:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-30 20:50 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  34. 2026-10-29 20:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-29 20:29 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  37. 2026-10-28 20:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-28 20:08 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  40. 2026-10-27 19:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-27 19:47 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  43. 2026-10-26 19:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-26 19:26 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  46. 2026-10-25 23:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-25 23:46 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  49. 2026-10-25 14:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-24 23:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-24 23:14 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  53. 2026-10-23 22:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-23 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-23 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  56. 2026-10-22 22:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-22 22:13 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  59. 2026-10-21 21:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-21 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  62. 2026-10-20 21:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-20 21:23 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  65. 2026-10-19 21:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-19 21:00 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  68. 2026-10-18 19:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-18 19:35 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  71. 2026-10-18 03:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-17 19:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-17 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-17 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.3% · 69th percentile
  75. 2026-10-16 18:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-42027?
CVE-2026-42027 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 4, 2026. Arbitrary Class Instantiation via Model Manifest in Apache OpenNLP ExtensionLoader Versions Affected: before 1.9.5, before 2.5.9, before 3.0.0-M3 Description: The ExtensionLoader.instantiateExtension(Class, String) method loads a class by its fully-qualified name via Class.forName() and invokes its…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-42027 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-42027 was published on May 4, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 26, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-42027 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-42027 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (53rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-42027?
CVE-2026-42027 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.8 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-42027?
A fix for CVE-2026-42027 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-42027 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-42027

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-42027?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.