CVE-2026-73625

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-13. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-57794 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2026-3953 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

GitPython versions before 3.1.54 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the check_unsafe_options guard that can be bypassed by smuggling git options inside single-character kwarg values. Attackers can supply crafted option dictionaries to clone_from, fetch, pull, push, ls_remote, iter_commits, blame, or archive methods to execute arbitrary OS commands via the --upload-pack parameter.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
52nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 13, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 13, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
Web page

GitPython before 3.1.54 Remote Code Execution via kwarg value smuggling | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/gitpython-before-remote-code-execution-via-kwarg-value-smuggling
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Unsafe git option guard bypass via single-character kwarg value token smuggling enables arbitrary command execution · Advisory · gitpython-developers/GitPython · GitHub

https://github.com/gitpython-developers/GitPython/security/advisories/GHSA-r9mr-m37c-5fr3

Patch Availability(12)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-git3.1.30-1, 3.1.30-1+deb12u2
  • every version up to 3.1.30-1+deb12u3: fixed in 3.1.30-1+deb12u3
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-git3.1.44-1
  • every version up to 3.1.44-1+deb13u1: fixed in 3.1.44-1+deb13u1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
python-git3.1.44-1, 3.1.45-1, 3.1.46-1, 3.1.50-1
  • every version up to 3.1.61-1: fixed in 3.1.61-1
—
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gitpython0.1.7 ... 3.1.9 (106 versions)
  • every version up to 3.1.54: fixed in 3.1.54
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 309 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 209 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 22:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-11 22:47 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-11 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  6. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  8. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  9. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  10. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  11. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  12. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  13. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  14. 2026-11-04 09:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-04 09:51 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-04 09:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  17. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  18. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  19. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  22. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  23. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  24. 2026-10-27 21:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-27 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  2. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 14:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  6. 2026-10-24 15:27 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-24 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  8. 2026-10-23 18:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-23 18:26 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-23 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  11. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  12. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  13. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 20:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-20 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-20 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  17. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  18. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 03:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  26. 2026-10-13 07:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-13 07:51 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-13 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  29. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  30. 2026-10-12 15:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-11 19:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-11 16:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-11 14:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  35. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  36. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  37. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  38. 2026-10-08 15:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-08 15:44 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-08 15:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  41. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  42. 2026-10-07 02:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-07 02:30 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-07 02:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  45. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  46. 2026-10-06 13:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-06 13:54 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-06 13:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  49. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  50. 2026-10-05 14:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-05 14:42 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-05 14:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  53. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  54. 2026-10-04 22:24 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-04 22:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  56. 2026-10-04 08:29 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-04 08:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  58. 2026-10-03 19:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-03 19:53 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-03 19:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  61. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  62. 2026-10-02 21:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-02 21:56 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-02 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  65. 2026-10-02 08:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-02 08:05 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-02 08:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  68. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  69. 2026-10-01 10:26 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-01 10:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  71. 2026-09-30 21:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-09-30 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-30 21:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-pjjh-f8rp-rjv3 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  74. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 58th percentile
  75. 2026-09-29 04:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-73625?
CVE-2026-73625 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 13, 2026. GitPython versions before 3.1.54 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the check_unsafe_options guard that can be bypassed by smuggling git options inside single-character kwarg values. Attackers can supply crafted option dictionaries to clone_from, fetch, pull, push, ls_remote,…
When was CVE-2026-73625 made public?
CVE-2026-73625 was made public on July 22, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on August 13, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-73625 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-73625 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (52nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-73625?
CVE-2026-73625 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-73625?
A fix for CVE-2026-73625 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-73625 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-73625

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-73625?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.