CVE-2026-8723

MEDIUMNVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 5.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-05-22. NVD baseline CVSS 5.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-30674 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-q8mj-m7cp-5q26 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Summary

qs.stringify throws TypeError when called with arrayFormat: 'comma' and encodeValuesOnly: true on an array containing null or undefined. The throw is synchronous and not handled by any of qs's null-related options (skipNulls, strictNullHandling).

Details

In the comma + encodeValuesOnly branch, lib/stringify.js:145 mapped the array through the raw encoder before joining:

obj = utils.maybeMap(obj, encoder);

utils.encode (lib/utils.js:195) reads str.length with no null guard, so a null or undefined element throws TypeError. skipNulls and strictNullHandling are both checked in the per-element loop below this line and never get a chance to run.

Same class of bug as the filter-array path fixed in 0c180a4. The vulnerable shape of the comma + encodeValuesOnly branch was introduced in 4c4b23d ("encode comma values more consistently", PR #463, 2023-01-19), first released in v6.11.1.

PoC

const qs = require('qs');

qs.stringify({ a: [null, 'b'] }, { arrayFormat: 'comma', encodeValuesOnly: true });

qs.stringify({ a: [undefined, 'b'] }, { arrayFormat: 'comma', encodeValuesOnly: true });

qs.stringify({ a: [null] }, { arrayFormat: 'comma', encodeValuesOnly: true });

// TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'length')

// at encode (lib/utils.js:195:13)

// at Object.maybeMap (lib/utils.js:322:37)

// at stringify (lib/stringify.js:145:25)

Fix

lib/stringify.js:145, applied in 21f80b3 on main and released as v6.15.2:

- obj = utils.maybeMap(obj, encoder);

+ obj = utils.maybeMap(obj, function (v) {

+ return v == null ? v : encoder(v);

+ });

null and undefined now pass through maybeMap unchanged and reach the join(',') step as-is. For { a: [null, 'b'] } this produces a=,b, matching the non-encodeValuesOnly comma path (which already joins before encoding and produces a=%2Cb for the same input). Single-element [null] arrays still collapse via the existing obj.join(',') || null and remain subject to skipNulls / strictNullHandling in the main loop.

Affected versions

>=6.11.1 <6.15.2 — fixed in v6.15.2.

The vulnerable code shape was introduced in 4c4b23d and first shipped in v6.11.1. Earlier versions — including all of 6.7.x, 6.8.x, 6.9.x, 6.10.x, and 6.11.0 — implemented the comma + encodeValuesOnly path differently (joining before encoding) and are not affected. Empirically verified across released versions.

Impact

Application code that calls qs.stringify with both arrayFormat: 'comma' and encodeValuesOnly: true (both non-default) on input that may contain a null or undefined array element will throw synchronously instead of producing a query string. In a typical Node.js HTTP framework (Express, Fastify, Koa, hapi) the sync throw is caught by the framework's error boundary and the affected request returns a 500; the worker process does not exit and subsequent requests are unaffected. The "kills the worker process" framing applies only to call sites outside a request-handler error boundary (background jobs, startup paths, stream pipelines) or to deployments with framework error handling explicitly disabled.

The vulnerable input is a null or undefined entry inside an array; this is reachable from JSON request bodies or from application code constructing arrays from user input, but not from standard HTML form submissions (which produce strings or omitted fields, not literal null).

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
55
EG Risk 55/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity53% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
34th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.3 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-31). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

May 17, 2026

Last Modified

October 23, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated May 17, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

remotely triggerable DoS: qs.stringify crashes with TypeError on null/undefined entries in comma-format arrays when encodeValuesOnly is set · Advisory · ljharb/qs · GitHub

https://github.com/ljharb/qs/security/advisories/GHSA-q8mj-m7cp-5q26
Web page

[Fix] `stringify`: skip null/undefined entries in `arrayFormat: 'comm… · ljharb/qs@21f80b3 · GitHub

https://github.com/ljharb/qs/commit/21f80b33e5c8b3f7eba1034fff0da4a4a37a1d41

Patch Availability(5)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatpython3-14-main-3.14.6-1.4.hum12026-07-10redhat
redhatpython3-14-main-3.14.6-1.1.hum12026-06-30redhat
redhatdotnet8-0-main-8.0.127-1.hum12026-05-14redhat
redhatnodejs20-main-20.20.2-1.hum12026-04-21redhat
npmqs @ 6.15.2 (fixes >= 6.11.1, <= 6.15.1)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-qs6.10.1+ds-1 ... 6.9.4+ds-1+deb11u1 (15 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-qs6.11.0+ds+~6.9.7-3 ... 6.16.0+ds+~6.15.1-1 (9 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-qs6.13.0+ds+~6.9.16-1 ... 6.16.0+ds+~6.15.1-1 (7 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
node-qs6.13.0+ds+~6.9.16-1, 6.14.1+ds+~6.14.0-1, 6.15.0+ds+~6.15.0-1, 6.15.0+ds+~6.15.0-2, 6.15.0+ds+~6.15.0-3
  • every version up to 6.15.2+ds+~6.15.1-1: fixed in 6.15.2+ds+~6.15.1-1
—
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
qs—
  • 6.11.1 up to 6.15.2: fixed in 6.15.2
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 215 rows on record for this CVE, as 99 entries (1 repeat merged).

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 115 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  4. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  5. 2026-11-08 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  6. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  7. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  8. 2026-11-05 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  9. 2026-11-04 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  10. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  11. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  12. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  13. 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q8mj-m7cp-5q26 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 5.3
  14. 2026-11-01 07:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  16. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  17. 2026-10-29 17:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-29 17:08 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  20. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  21. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  22. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-25 13:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-23 23:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-10-23 23:31 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  4. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 35th percentile
  5. 2026-10-22 12:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-10-22 12:39 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  8. 2026-10-20 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  9. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  10. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  11. 2026-10-18 03:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  13. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  14. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  15. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  16. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  17. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  18. 2026-10-12 14:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-11 19:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-11 16:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  23. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  24. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  25. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  26. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 34th percentile
  27. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  28. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  29. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  30. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  31. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  32. 2026-09-30 03:40 UTCOSV refresh
  33. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  34. 2026-09-27 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  35. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  36. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 33rd percentile
  37. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  38. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  39. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  40. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  41. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  42. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  43. 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  44. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  45. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  46. 2026-09-13 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  47. 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  48. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  49. 2026-09-11 09:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  50. 2026-09-11 06:23 UTCOSV refresh
  51. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  52. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  53. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  54. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  55. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  56. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  57. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  58. 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  59. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  60. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  61. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  62. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  63. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  64. 2026-08-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  65. 2026-08-23 17:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-08-23 17:21 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  68. 2026-08-22 00:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-08-22 00:51 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  71. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  72. 2026-08-20 19:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-08-20 19:14 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-8723?
CVE-2026-8723 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on May 17, 2026. Summary qs.stringify throws TypeError when called with arrayFormat: 'comma' and encodeValuesOnly: true on an array containing null or undefined. The throw is synchronous and not handled by any of qs's null-related options (skipNulls, strictNullHandling). Details In the comma + encodeValuesOnly…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-8723 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-8723 was published on May 17, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 23, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-8723 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-8723 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (34th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-8723?
CVE-2026-8723 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-8723?
A fix for CVE-2026-8723 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-8723 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-8723

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-8723?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.