CVE-2026-2391

LOWNVD 7.53.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This low-severity CVE scores 3.7 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.5%, top 62% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, nvd
Elevated
3.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: Elevated riskExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Summary

The arrayLimit option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when comma: true is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284).

Details

When the comma option is set to true (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., ?param=a,b,c becomes ['a', 'b', 'c']). However, the limit check for arrayLimit (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in parseArrayValue, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation.

Vulnerable code (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50):

if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) {
    return val.split(',');
}

if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) {     throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); }

return val;

The split(',') returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via utils.combine does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., ?param=,,,,,,,,...), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of arrayLimit, which is enforced correctly for indexed (a[0]=) and bracket (a[]=) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p).

PoC

Test 1 - Basic bypass:
npm install qs

const qs = require('qs');

const payload = 'a=' + ','.repeat(25); // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5) const options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true };

try {   const result = qs.parse(payload, options);   console.log(result.a.length); // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful) } catch (e) {   console.log('Limit enforced:', e.message); // Not thrown }

Configuration:
  • comma: true
  • arrayLimit: 5
  • throwOnLimitExceeded: true

Expected: Throws "Array limit exceeded" error. Actual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26.

Impact

Denial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
3.7(medium)
EG Risk
48(Attend)
EG Risk 48/100SSVC: Attend

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity37% × 45%
Exploitation40% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
39%
KEV
Not listed

Published

February 12, 2026

Last Modified

June 17, 2026

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
qs6.14.2

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 49× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-25 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-24 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-23 03:07 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-21 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-17 15:29 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-07-13 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-08 15:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-05 02:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-01 15:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-06-29 13:32 UTCOSV refresh
  21. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-06-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  32. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-19 19:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-06-17 17:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-16 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-06-15 17:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-06-14 23:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-13 23:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-06-12 23:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  48. 2026-06-11 14:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-06-10 22:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-06-10 13:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-08 14:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-07 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-06-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-06-05 22:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-05 06:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  64. 2026-06-04 13:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-06-01 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-05-31 22:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  70. 2026-05-31 00:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-05-29 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-05-29 13:44 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-2391?
CVE-2026-2391 is a low vulnerability published on February 12, 2026. Summary The arrayLimit option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when comma: true is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in…
When was CVE-2026-2391 disclosed?
CVE-2026-2391 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on February 12, 2026, with the most recent update on June 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-2391 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-2391 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 61.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-2391?
CVE-2026-2391 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD). EchelonGraph synthesises NVD + CISA KEV + FIRST EPSS + GHSA into a combined EG score of 3.7.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-2391?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-2391, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-2391

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-2391?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.