CVE-2026-82417

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.35.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 82% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated
5.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.3Exploit: Elevated riskExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Summary

qs.stringify throws a TypeError when it serializes an object whose own constructor property has a truthy, non-callable isBuffer member. utils.isBuffer duck-types buffers by calling obj.constructor.isBuffer(obj) after checking only that the property is truthy, so a value such as { constructor: { isBuffer: "x" } } makes the call throw TypeError: obj.constructor.isBuffer is not a function.

Details

lib/stringify.js:127 calls utils.isBuffer on every non-primitive value it serializes. utils.isBuffer (lib/utils.js:332) reads obj.constructor.isBuffer and invokes it without verifying that it is a function. constructor and isBuffer are ordinary property names, so any object carrying them as own properties reaches the unchecked call.

Such an object can be built from untrusted input. qs.parse("x[constructor][isBuffer]=y", { plainObjects: true }) or { allowPrototypes: true } keeps the constructor key as an own property (the default parse options drop it), and JSON.parse("{\"a\":{\"constructor\":{\"isBuffer\":\"x\"}}}") produces the same shape with no qs option involved. Express 4 with its default query parser setting and body-parser with extended: true both call qs.parse with allowPrototypes: true, so on those stacks req.query and req.body can carry the shape directly.

PoC

var qs = require("qs");

qs.stringify(qs.parse("x[constructor][isBuffer]=y", { plainObjects: true }));

qs.stringify(JSON.parse("{\"a\":{\"constructor\":{\"isBuffer\":\"x\"}}}"));

// TypeError: obj.constructor.isBuffer is not a function

// at Object.isBuffer (lib/utils.js:332:78)

// at stringify (lib/stringify.js:127:45)

Fix

lib/utils.js, applied in e83d321 on main and released as v6.16.0:

- return !!(obj.constructor && obj.constructor.isBuffer && obj.constructor.isBuffer(obj));

+ return !!(obj.constructor && typeof obj.constructor.isBuffer === "function" && obj.constructor.isBuffer(obj));

Real Buffer, safer-buffer, and browserify buffer polyfill instances serialize exactly as before; only the throw is removed.

Affected versions

>=2.2.5 <6.16.0, fixed in v6.16.0.

The unguarded duck-type was introduced in 3768a75 and first shipped in v2.2.5 (September 2014). v2.2.4 and earlier used Buffer.isBuffer and are not affected. Every release from v2.2.5 through v6.15.3 contains the unguarded call.

Impact

An unauthenticated request can make any code path that re-serializes attacker-influenced data with qs.stringify (for example, rebuilding a query string from req.query for a redirect or an upstream request, or serializing a parsed JSON body) throw synchronously. In a typical Node.js HTTP framework the throw is caught by the framework error boundary and the affected request returns a 500; the process survives and other requests are unaffected. Where the call runs outside an error boundary, such as an async Express 4 handler (where the throw becomes an unhandled promise rejection) or a background job, the process exits, so the impact in that case depends on the application error handling rather than on qs.

CVSS v3
5.3
EG Score
5.3(medium)
EG Risk
55(Attend)
EG Risk 55/100SSVC: Attend

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity53% × 45%
Exploitation40% × 40%
Automatability100% × 15%
Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
18%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 29, 2026

Last Modified

September 3, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 29, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
github_commit

commit e83d321ffafb (ljharb/qs)

Fix landed in ljharb/qs commit e83d321ffafb — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/ljharb/qs/commit/e83d321ffafb38cf210683ac31714fce6ce1c6c6
github Patch Available🟡 PoC Available

Denial of Service via Attacker Controlled isBuffer · Advisory · ljharb/qs · GitHub

https://github.com/ljharb/qs/security/advisories/GHSA-4mjr-xmp4-gh2g

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatgrafana13-2-main-13.2.1-0.1.hum12026-09-03redhat
redhatgrafana13-1-main-13.1.3-0.4.hum12026-09-02redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
node-qs6.11.0+ds+~6.9.7-3 ... 6.16.0+ds+~6.15.1-1 (9 versions)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
node-qs6.13.0+ds+~6.9.16-1 ... 6.16.0+ds+~6.15.1-1 (7 versions)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
node-qs6.13.0+ds+~6.9.16-1 ... 6.15.2+ds+~6.15.1-1 (6 versions)6.16.0+ds+~6.15.1-1
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
qs6.16.0

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 52× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:46 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-18 19:46 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-17 20:49 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-17 20:49 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-16 18:50 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-16 18:50 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-15 18:27 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-15 18:27 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-14 18:45 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-13 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-13 19:39 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-12 20:42 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-12 20:42 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-11 21:45 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-11 21:45 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-10 22:48 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-10 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-09 23:51 UTCVendor advisory
Show 27 more
  1. 2026-09-08 23:40 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-08 23:40 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-07 15:00 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-06 15:13 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-06 15:13 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-05 16:15 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-05 16:15 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-04 17:17 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-04 17:17 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-02 16:27 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 17:28 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-31 18:31 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-31 17:24 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-30 23:16 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-30 00:19 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-29 23:53 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-29 23:52 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-82417?
CVE-2026-82417 is a medium vulnerability published on August 29, 2026. Summary qs.stringify throws a TypeError when it serializes an object whose own constructor property has a truthy, non-callable isBuffer member. utils.isBuffer duck-types buffers by calling obj.constructor.isBuffer(obj) after checking only that the property is truthy, so a value such as {…
When was CVE-2026-82417 disclosed?
CVE-2026-82417 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 29, 2026, with the most recent update on September 3, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-82417 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-82417 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 81.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-82417?
CVE-2026-82417 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-82417?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-82417, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-82417

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-82417?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.