CVE-2026-84783

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-29. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asEUVD-2026-89014 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while another thread is still using it.

Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a Denial of Service.

CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free

Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate's X.509v3 extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.

Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its extensions are decoded. In TLS the certificates at risk are the trusted CA certificates supplied for chain verification, by whatever means, since these are shared by every connection and their extensions are decoded and cached the first time a chain is built to them. Certificates sent by the peer are decoded separately for each connection and are not shared, so they are not affected. In a TLS client verifying server certificates, or a TLS server that requests and verifies client certificates, the use-after-free could only occur if the first chains built to the same trusted CA are built by several connections at the same time.

FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as X.509 certificate handling is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.

OpenSSL 4.0 is vulnerable to this issue.

OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.

OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.3.

This issue was reported on 27 August 2026 by Tim Becker (Xint.io) and independently in a public report on 31 August 2026 by aydinmercan.

The fix has been developed by Bob Beck.

-- cut (non-publishing metadata for internal use) -- Reported by: Tim Becker (Xint.io), aydinmercan Fixed by: Bob Beck

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
21st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 29, 2026

Last Modified

October 8, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Sep 29, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit de97a1a54f43 (openssl/openssl)

Fix landed in openssl/openssl commit de97a1a54f43 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/de97a1a54f43edefd43b5084ecac54ecadb33081

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatopenssl3-main-3.5.8-1.hum12026-09-23redhat
redhatopenssl-main-3.5.8-0.1.hum12026-08-25redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 138 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 38 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-14 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 16:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  3. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 11:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 11:01 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-12 11:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  9. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  10. 2026-11-08 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  11. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  12. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  13. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  14. 2026-11-05 14:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-05 14:46 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-05 14:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-11-04 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  18. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  19. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  20. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  21. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  22. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  23. 2026-10-29 18:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-29 18:33 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-29 18:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  2. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  3. 2026-10-27 19:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-10-27 19:24 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-10-27 19:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  6. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  7. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 13:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  11. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  12. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  13. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 07:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-20 07:33 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-20 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  18. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  20. 2026-10-18 03:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  23. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  24. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  26. 2026-10-13 05:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-13 05:33 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-13 05:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  29. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  30. 2026-10-12 14:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-12 03:28 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-12 03:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  33. 2026-10-11 19:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-11 16:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-11 15:21 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-11 15:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  37. 2026-10-11 13:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  39. 2026-10-11 03:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-11 03:29 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-11 03:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  42. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  43. 2026-10-10 15:38 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-10 15:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  45. 2026-10-10 03:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-10 03:33 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-10 03:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  48. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  49. 2026-10-09 15:42 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-09 15:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  51. 2026-10-09 03:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-09 03:50 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-09 03:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  54. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  55. 2026-10-08 15:58 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-08 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  57. 2026-10-08 01:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-08 01:32 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-08 01:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  60. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  61. 2026-10-07 19:51 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-07 19:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  63. 2026-10-07 07:59 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-07 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  65. 2026-10-06 20:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-06 20:07 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-06 20:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  68. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  69. 2026-10-06 08:15 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-06 08:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  71. 2026-10-05 20:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-05 20:24 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-05 20:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  74. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  75. 2026-10-05 08:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-84783?
CVE-2026-84783 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 29, 2026. Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while another thread is still using it. Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server…
When was CVE-2026-84783 made public?
CVE-2026-84783 was made public on September 29, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, OpenSSL Software Foundation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on September 29, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 8, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-84783 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-84783 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (21st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-84783?
CVE-2026-84783 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-84783?
A fix for CVE-2026-84783 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-84783 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-84783

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-84783?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.