CVE-2026-53175

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-06-25. the CNA's CVSS baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cna:linux, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

inet: frags: fix use-after-free caused by the fqdir_pre_exit() flush

On netns teardown, fqdir_pre_exit() walks the fqdir rhashtable and flushes every fragment queue that is not yet complete using inet_frag_queue_flush(). That helper frees all the skbs queued on the fragment queue but does not set INET_FRAG_COMPLETE, and leaves q->fragments_tail and q->last_run_head pointing at the freed skbs. The queue itself stays in the rhashtable.

fqdir_pre_exit() first lowers high_thresh to 0 to stop new queue lookups, but it cannot stop a fragment that already obtained the queue through inet_frag_find() earlier and stalled just before taking the queue lock. Once that fragment resumes after the flush and takes the queue lock, it passes the INET_FRAG_COMPLETE check and then dereferences the freed fragments_tail. inet_frag_queue_insert() reads FRAG_CB() and ->len of that pointer and, on the append path, writes ->next_frag, causing a slab use-after-free. IPv6, nf_conntrack_reasm6 and 6lowpan reassembly share the same flush path and are affected as well.

Reset rb_fragments, fragments_tail and last_run_head in inet_frag_queue_flush() so a flushed queue no longer points at the freed skbs. A fragment that resumes after the flush and takes the queue lock then finds an empty queue and starts a new run instead of dereferencing the freed fragments_tail. ip_frag_reinit() already performed this reset after its own flush, so drop the now duplicate code there.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
24%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 1, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Sep 15, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

inet: frags: fix use-after-free caused by the fqdir_pre_exit() flush - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/32594b09854970d7ba83eb2dc8c69a2edd158c8e
generic

inet: frags: fix use-after-free caused by the fqdir_pre_exit() flush - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/010c3313a4d178dc2d3ce958d2e5cb055e2864c1
generic

inet: frags: fix use-after-free caused by the fqdir_pre_exit() flush - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/89b909e9704587bfecc1aab1d37e98faee03b9f9
generic

inet: frags: fix use-after-free caused by the fqdir_pre_exit() flush - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c22599cc90e1cd5f8129c8670bd68a02ff7177b4
generic

inet: frags: fix use-after-free caused by the fqdir_pre_exit() flush - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0e823ca0e7391630784ae7dd0981b7ad170a93d9
redhat

2492840 – (CVE-2026-53175) CVE-2026-53175 kernel: Linux kernel: Memory corruption via use-after-free in internet fragmentation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2492840
redhat Patch Available

CVE-2026-53175 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53175

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53175(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(9)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (145 versions)7.0.13-1

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(9)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 99× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 468 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 07:35 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-18 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-18 07:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-14 05:33 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-14 05:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-14 01:25 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-09-14 01:25 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-09-14 01:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-13 13:50 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-13 13:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-13 09:42 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-13 09:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-12 15:58 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-12 15:58 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-12 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-01 12:18 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-01 12:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-30 23:47 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-08-30 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-30 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-08-30 19:40 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-08-30 19:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-28 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-28 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-28 00:02 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-28 00:02 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-28 00:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-25 06:13 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-25 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-25 02:01 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-25 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-24 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-08-24 21:52 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-08-24 21:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-08-24 13:14 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-08-24 13:14 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-08-24 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-08-24 04:31 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-24 04:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-24 00:16 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-24 00:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-23 20:08 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-08-23 20:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-08-23 16:00 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-23 16:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-23 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-23 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-23 07:46 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-23 07:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-23 02:37 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-23 02:37 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-23 02:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-22 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-22 22:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-22 14:53 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-22 14:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-22 10:45 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-22 10:45 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-22 10:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-21 22:34 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-21 22:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-21 18:27 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-21 18:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-21 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-21 14:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-21 09:18 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-21 09:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-21 05:09 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-21 05:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-21 00:17 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-21 00:17 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-21 00:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-08-20 20:09 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-20 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-20 16:02 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-20 16:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-20 11:17 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-20 11:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-20 07:09 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53175?
CVE-2026-53175 is a critical vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: inet: frags: fix use-after-free caused by the fqdirpreexit() flush On netns teardown, fqdirpreexit() walks the fqdir rhashtable and flushes every fragment queue that is not yet complete using inetfragqueue_flush(). That helper…
When was CVE-2026-53175 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53175 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on September 1, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53175 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53175 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 75.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53175?
CVE-2026-53175 has a CVSS v4.0 base score of 9.8 (CNA self-assessment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53175?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53175, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53175

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53175?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.