CVE-2026-64523

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-48867 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/handshake: Take a long-lived file reference at submit

handshake_nl_accept_doit() needs the file pointer backing req->hr_sk->sk_socket to survive the window between handshake_req_next() and the subsequent FD_PREPARE() and get_file(). The submit-side sock_hold() does not provide that. sk_refcnt keeps struct sock alive, but struct socket is owned by sock->file: when the consumer fputs the last file reference, sock_release() tears the socket down regardless of any sock_hold.

Add an hr_file pointer to struct handshake_req and acquire an explicit reference on sock->file during handshake_req_submit(). handshake_complete() and handshake_req_cancel() release the reference on the completion-bit-winning path.

The submit error path must also release the file reference, but after rhashtable insertion a concurrent handshake_req_cancel() can discover the request and race the error path. Gate the error-path cleanup -- sk_destruct restoration, fput, and request destruction -- with test_and_set_bit(HANDSHAKE_F_REQ_COMPLETED), the same serialization handshake_complete() and handshake_req_cancel() already use. When cancel has already claimed ownership, the submit error path returns without touching the request; socket teardown handles final destruction.

The accept-side dereferences are not yet retargeted; that change comes in the next patch.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
59
EG Risk 59/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
39th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

November 12, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Nov 7, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

net/handshake: Take a long-lived file reference at submit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b913801ad9b9a51437d84d030ec6843e08976bd6
Web page

net/handshake: Take a long-lived file reference at submit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/685b10dd0e32c7782cead16c8cf055c609678583
Web page

net/handshake: Take a long-lived file reference at submit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/22e371a93563c30ebebc576db049785e0d7fc617
Web page

net/handshake: Take a long-lived file reference at submit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/16eaba5aa89c04eea125905bb8f988c1897f4f29
Web page

net/handshake: Take a long-lived file reference at submit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/09dba37eee70d0596e26645015f1aa95a9848e9d

Patch Availability(10)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1015.15) @ resolute2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1035.38) @ noble2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2016.16) @ resolute2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (7.0.0-1014.14~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-12ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1016.16) @ resolute2026-11-12ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.69.1.el10_22026-10-28redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.61.1.el9_82026-10-26redhat
linuxKernel @ 6.6.160 (fixes >=6.4.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (145 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 100× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 826 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 726 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 21:28 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-12 21:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-12 16:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-12 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 16:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-11 16:48 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-11 16:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  12. 2026-11-10 17:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-10 17:00 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-10 17:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  16. 2026-11-09 17:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-09 17:13 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-09 17:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  20. 2026-11-08 17:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-08 17:26 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-08 17:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  24. 2026-11-07 17:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-07 17:38 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 17:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  3. 2026-11-06 17:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-06 17:51 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-06 17:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  7. 2026-11-06 14:55 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-11-05 18:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-05 18:03 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-05 18:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 18:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-04 18:16 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-04 18:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  16. 2026-11-03 18:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-03 18:28 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-03 18:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  20. 2026-11-03 11:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-03 11:52 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-03 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  24. 2026-11-02 12:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-02 12:04 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-11-02 12:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  28. 2026-11-01 12:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-11-01 12:16 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-11-01 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  32. 2026-10-31 12:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-31 12:28 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-31 12:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  36. 2026-10-30 12:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-30 12:40 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-30 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 39th percentile
  40. 2026-10-29 12:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-29 12:52 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-29 12:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 38th percentile
  44. 2026-10-28 13:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-28 13:05 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-28 13:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  48. 2026-10-27 13:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-27 13:16 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-27 13:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  52. 2026-10-26 13:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-26 13:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  54. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  55. 2026-10-25 14:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-25 13:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-25 13:08 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-25 13:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  60. 2026-10-24 13:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-24 13:19 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-24 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  64. 2026-10-23 13:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-23 13:32 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-10-23 13:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  67. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  68. 2026-10-22 13:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-22 13:37 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-22 13:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  71. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  72. 2026-10-21 13:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-21 13:48 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-21 13:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fc48-5g6g-x546 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  75. 2026-10-21 12:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64523?
CVE-2026-64523 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/handshake: Take a long-lived file reference at submit handshake_nl_accept_doit() needs the file pointer backing req->hr_sk->sk_socket to survive the window between handshake_req_next() and the subsequent FD_PREPARE() and…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64523 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64523 was published on July 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64523 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64523 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (39th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64523?
CVE-2026-64523 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64523?
A fix for CVE-2026-64523 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64523 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64523

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64523?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.