CVE-2026-53247

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-06-25. The CNA's CVSS baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asEUVD-2026-39198 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: Fix use-after-free in metadata dst teardown

mtk_free_dev() calls metadata_dst_free() which frees the metadata_dst with kfree() immediately, bypassing the RCU grace period. In the RX path, skb_dst_set_noref() sets a non-refcounted pointer from the skb to the metadata_dst. This function requires RCU read-side protection and the dst must remain valid until all RCU readers complete. Since metadata_dst_free() calls kfree() directly, a use-after-free can occur if any skb still holds a noref pointer to the dst when the driver tears it down. Replace metadata_dst_free() with dst_release() which properly goes through the refcount path: when the refcount drops to zero, it schedules the actual free via call_rcu_hurry(), ensuring all RCU readers have completed before the memory is freed.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
53rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 5, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: Fix use-after-free in metadata dst teardown - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/80df409e1a483676826a6c66e693dba6ac507751
Web page

net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: Fix use-after-free in metadata dst teardown - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d86aeb46d5f69c704065a8c69822582787272a1
Web page

net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: Fix use-after-free in metadata dst teardown - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e634408d2b0cd939cfe019398a21fb47b7a8ffe3
Web page

net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: Fix use-after-free in metadata dst teardown - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/459c6f35c58cf0fd5247e55d73ddaa29571d9b7e
Web page

net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: Fix use-after-free in metadata dst teardown - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/72775977e89c25c99ee84d2c5baa3f86a8ba5cb4

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53247(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(19)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.94-1: fixed in 6.12.94-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (146 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.13-1: fixed in 7.0.13-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(18)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 82× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 794 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 694 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  2. 2026-11-13 02:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-13 02:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 01:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 01:50 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-12 01:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  9. 2026-11-11 00:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-11 00:44 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-11 00:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-10 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  13. 2026-11-09 23:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-09 23:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  16. 2026-11-08 22:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-08 22:33 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-08 22:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-11-08 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  20. 2026-11-07 21:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-07 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-07 21:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  24. 2026-11-06 20:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-06 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  3. 2026-11-06 11:55 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-11-05 19:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-05 19:15 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-05 19:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  8. 2026-11-04 18:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-04 18:08 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-04 18:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-04 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  12. 2026-11-03 17:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-03 17:02 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-03 17:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  16. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  17. 2026-11-02 15:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-02 15:56 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-02 15:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-01 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  21. 2026-11-01 14:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-01 14:49 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-01 14:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-31 13:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-31 13:43 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-31 13:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  28. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-30 12:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-30 12:37 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-30 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  32. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-29 11:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-29 11:29 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-10-29 11:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  37. 2026-10-28 10:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-28 10:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  40. 2026-10-27 08:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-27 08:22 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-27 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  44. 2026-10-26 05:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-26 05:01 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-26 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  48. 2026-10-25 14:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-25 03:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-25 03:55 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-25 03:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  53. 2026-10-24 02:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-24 02:49 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-24 02:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  56. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  57. 2026-10-23 01:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-23 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-23 01:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  60. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  61. 2026-10-22 00:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-22 00:34 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-22 00:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  64. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  65. 2026-10-20 23:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-20 23:25 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-20 23:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  69. 2026-10-19 22:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-19 22:18 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-19 22:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  72. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  73. 2026-10-18 21:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-18 21:05 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-18 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-mm4j-fwqr-3cf4 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53247?
CVE-2026-53247 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: Fix use-after-free in metadata dst teardown mtk_free_dev() calls metadata_dst_free() which frees the metadata_dst with kfree() immediately, bypassing the RCU grace period. In the RX path,…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-53247 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-53247 was published on June 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 5, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-53247 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53247 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (53rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53247?
CVE-2026-53247 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (the CNA's own assessment, by linux; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53247?
A fix for CVE-2026-53247 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-53247 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53247

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53247?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.