CVE-2026-53154

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-06-25. NVD baseline CVSS 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths

Two sites in mm/hugetlb.c allocate a hugetlb folio via alloc_hugetlb_folio() (consuming a VMA reservation) and then call copy_user_large_folio(), which became int-returning in commit 1cb9dc4b475c ("mm: hwpoison: support recovery from HugePage copy-on-write faults") and can now fail (e.g. -EHWPOISON on a hwpoisoned source page). On the failure path, folio_put() restores the global hugetlb pool count through free_huge_folio(), but the per-VMA reservation map entry is left marked consumed:

  • hugetlb_mfill_atomic_pte() resubmission path (UFFDIO_COPY)
  • copy_hugetlb_page_range() fork-time CoW path when
hugetlb_try_dup_anon_rmap() fails (rare: pinned hugetlb anon folio under fork)

User-visible effect: on UFFDIO_COPY into a private hugetlb VMA where the resubmission copy fails, the reservation for that address is leaked from the VMA's reserve map. A subsequent fault at the same address takes the no-reservation path, and under hugetlb pool pressure the task is SIGBUSed at an address it had previously reserved. The fork-time CoW path leaks the same way in the child VMA's reserve map, though it requires the much rarer combination of pinned hugetlb anon page + hwpoisoned source.

Add the missing restore_reserve_on_error() call before folio_put() on both error paths.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5(medium)
EG Risk
29(Track)
EG Risk 29/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity55% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 25, 2026

Last Modified

July 7, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jul 7, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e47bf16af3c45470ea32f2241fa69aefe0dd61bd
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c72469ac0f274bde3f0df60a4584e14a123d0aa6
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8d6e1dd3ad1340cd8b6d554b7aa93d8f0a1c6d38
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/45e33d43243d71d089af42f5077b8213cee6610f
generic

mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/40c81856e622a9dc59294a90d169ac07ea25b0b0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-53154(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(4)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(2 across 2 ecosystems)
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.94-1~bpo12+1 (27 versions)6.12.94-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (145 versions)7.0.13-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(4)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 205 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 07:40 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-18 07:40 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-18 07:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-14 01:28 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-14 01:28 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-14 01:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-13 16:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-12 16:00 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-12 16:00 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-09-12 16:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-04 05:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-30 19:43 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-30 19:43 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-30 19:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-28 21:41 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-28 02:55 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-28 02:55 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-08-28 02:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-24 13:16 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-24 13:16 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-08-24 13:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-23 09:39 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-23 09:39 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-08-23 09:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-22 10:55 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-22 10:55 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-22 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-21 05:55 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-21 05:55 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-08-21 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-20 07:11 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-08-20 07:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-08-19 01:35 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-08-19 01:35 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-08-19 01:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  29. 2026-08-18 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-17 02:43 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-08-17 02:43 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-08-17 02:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  34. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-16 03:59 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-08-16 03:59 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-08-16 03:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-08-16 02:14 UTCEPSS rescore
  39. 2026-08-15 05:15 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-15 05:15 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-15 05:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-15 01:30 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-14 06:31 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-14 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-14 06:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-13 07:47 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-13 07:47 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-13 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-08-12 08:33 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-12 08:33 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-12 08:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-11 09:49 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-11 09:49 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-11 09:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-08-10 11:05 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-10 11:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-09 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-09 12:21 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-08-09 12:21 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-08-09 12:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-08 16:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-08-08 13:37 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-08 13:37 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-08 13:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-07 14:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-06 16:08 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-06 16:08 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-06 16:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-08-05 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-08-05 17:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-04 18:40 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-53154?
CVE-2026-53154 is a medium vulnerability published on June 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/hugetlb: restore reservation on error in hugetlb folio copy paths Two sites in mm/hugetlb.c allocate a hugetlb folio via allochugetlbfolio() (consuming a VMA reservation) and then call copyuserlarge_folio(), which became…
When was CVE-2026-53154 disclosed?
CVE-2026-53154 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 25, 2026, with the most recent update on July 7, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-53154 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-53154 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-53154?
CVE-2026-53154 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-53154?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-53154, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-53154

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-53154?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.