CVE-2026-64459

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 93% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tcp: restore RCU grace period in tcp_ao_destroy_sock

Commit 51e547e8c89c ("tcp: Free TCP-AO/TCP-MD5 info/keys without RCU") removed the call_rcu() callback from tcp_ao_destroy_sock(), arguing that "the destruction of info/keys is delayed until the socket destructor" and therefore "no one can discover it anymore".

That argument does not hold for the call site in tcp_connect() (net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:4327-4332). At that point the socket is in TCP_SYN_SENT, has already been inserted into the inet ehash by inet_hash_connect() in tcp_v4_connect(), and is therefore very much discoverable: any softirq running tcp_v4_rcv() on another CPU can take the socket out of the ehash, walk into tcp_inbound_hash(), and load tp->ao_info via implicit RCU before bh_lock_sock_nested() is taken on the destroying CPU.

The reader path then enters __tcp_ao_do_lookup() (net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c:208) which re-loads tp->ao_info via rcu_dereference_check(); the re-load can still observe the (about-to-be-freed) pointer because there is no synchronize_rcu() between rcu_assign_pointer(tp->ao_info, NULL) and tcp_ao_info_free() in tcp_ao_destroy_sock(). The captured pointer is then walked at line 223:

hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &ao->head, node, ...)

The writer's synchronous kfree() is free to complete between the line 218 re-fetch and the line 223 hlist iteration. The slab is reused (or simply LIST_POISON1-stamped if not yet reused) and the iteration walks attacker-controlled or poison memory in softirq context.

Reproducer (no debug shim, stock x86_64 v7.1-rc2 SMP+KASAN, QEMU+KVM): an unprivileged uid=1000 process inside CLONE_NEWUSER|CLONE_NEWNET installs TCP_MD5SIG + TCP_AO_ADD_KEY on a TCP socket, sprays forged TCP-AO segments toward its eventual 4-tuple via raw sockets, then calls connect(). The md5-wins reconciliation in tcp_connect() fires tcp_ao_destroy_sock(); the softirq backlog reader on the loopback NAPI path crashes on the freed ao->head.first walk:

Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xfbd59c000000002f KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0xdead000000000178-0xdead00000000017f] CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 100 Comm: repro_userns RIP: 0010:__tcp_ao_do_lookup+0x107/0x1c0 Call Trace: __tcp_ao_do_lookup+0x107/0x1c0 tcp_ao_inbound_lookup.constprop.0+0x12a/0x200 tcp_inbound_ao_hash+0x5ea/0x1520 tcp_inbound_hash+0x7ce/0x1240 tcp_v4_rcv+0x1e7a/0x3e10 ...

Restore the RCU grace period: re-add struct rcu_head to tcp_ao_info and replace the synchronous tcp_ao_info_free() with a call_rcu() callback. Readers that captured tp->ao_info before rcu_assign_pointer NULLed it now see the object remain valid until rcu_read_unlock(). With the patch applied the reproducer runs cleanly for 2000 iterations on the same kernel build.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(medium)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

July 27, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Jul 27, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

tcp: restore RCU grace period in tcp_ao_destroy_sock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8bc4d43bccbd60efe85d0a44d5bf41762f2f0c30
generic

tcp: restore RCU grace period in tcp_ao_destroy_sock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/657646c08c94ef7b9dbe468fe7828032216f9841
generic

tcp: restore RCU grace period in tcp_ao_destroy_sock - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4caf12c778fed3dc3824cf36263be5e2c491fbd0

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64459(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 14× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-27 05:26 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-27 05:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-27 05:13 UTCEG score recompute 9.80
  4. 2026-07-27 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-27 05:12 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.8 · severity → CRITICAL
  6. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-26 02:47 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-26 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-25 10:39 UTCNVD update
  13. 2026-07-25 09:26 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-07-25 09:21 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64459?
CVE-2026-64459 is a critical vulnerability published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: restore RCU grace period in tcpaodestroy_sock Commit 51e547e8c89c ("tcp: Free TCP-AO/TCP-MD5 info/keys without RCU") removed the callrcu() callback from tcpaodestroysock(), arguing that "the destruction of info/keys is delayed…
When was CVE-2026-64459 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64459 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 25, 2026, with the most recent update on July 27, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64459 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64459 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 93.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64459?
CVE-2026-64459 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64459?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64459, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-64459

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64459?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.