CVE-2025-55315

CRITICALNVD 9.99.9
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 9.9 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2025-10-14. NVD baseline CVSS 9.9; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Weaponized

Also known asEUVD-2025-34426 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.9EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High exploitation likelihood — EPSS 67%
  • Public exploit or proof-of-concept code is available
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 67%CVSS: 9.9Exploit: Public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Inconsistent interpretation of http requests ('http request/response smuggling') in ASP.NET Core allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

CVSS v3
9.9
EG Score
9.9CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
71
EG Risk 71/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity99% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.9 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation67% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
67%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.9): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.9 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.9 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
67% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 14, 2025

Last Modified

October 18, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Nov 9, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Patch available. Sources: microsoft.
Web page🟡 PoC Available

Kestrel Chunked Smuggling Proof of Concept (CVE-2025-55315) · GitHub

https://gist.github.com/N3mes1s/d0897c13ca199e739ecc2b562f466040
Web page

Understanding the worst .NET vulnerability ever: request smuggling and CVE-2025-55315

https://andrewlock.net/understanding-the-worst-dotnet-vulnerability-request-smuggling-and-cve-2025-55315/
Microsoft

Security Update Guide - Microsoft Security Response Center

https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2025-55315

Patch Availability(17)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntunetstandard-targeting-pack-2.1-8.0 (8.0.121-0ubuntu1~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-11-12ubuntu
redhatdotnet9-0-main-9.0.116-1.hum12026-04-21redhat
redhatdotnet8-0-main-8.0.126-1.hum12026-04-20redhat
redhatdevspaces/udi-rhel9:3.25.0-17655822072025-12-15redhat
redhatdotnet10.0-0:10.0.100~rc.2.25502.107-0.10.el9_72025-11-11redhat
redhatdotnet10.0-0:10.0.100~rc.2.25502.107-0.12.el10_12025-11-11redhat
redhatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.121-1.el9_42025-10-16redhat
redhatdotnet9.0-0:9.0.111-1.el8_102025-10-15redhat
redhatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.121-1.el9_62025-10-15redhat
redhatdotnet9.0-0:9.0.111-1.el10_02025-10-15redhat
redhatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.121-1.el8_102025-10-15redhat
redhatdotnet9.0-0:9.0.111-1.el9_62025-10-15redhat
redhatdotnet8.0-0:8.0.121-1.el10_02025-10-15redhat
nugetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm @ 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107 (fixes = 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107)—ghsa
nugetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm @ 9.0.10 (fixes >= 9.0.0, <= 9.0.9)—ghsa
nugetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm @ 8.0.21 (fixes >= 8.0.0, <= 8.0.20)—ghsa
nugetMicrosoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core @ 2.3.6 (fixes <= 2.3.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(22 across 6 ecosystems)
NuGet(13)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm8.0.0 ... 8.0.8 (20 versions)
  • 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107 up to 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107: fixed in 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107
  • 9.0.0 up to 9.0.10: fixed in 9.0.10
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.0.21: fixed in 8.0.21
—
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-arm648.0.0 ... 8.0.8 (20 versions)
  • 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107 up to 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107: fixed in 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107
  • 9.0.0 up to 9.0.10: fixed in 9.0.10
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.0.21: fixed in 8.0.21
—
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-musl-arm8.0.0 ... 8.0.8 (20 versions)
  • 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107 up to 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107: fixed in 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107
  • 9.0.0 up to 9.0.10: fixed in 9.0.10
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.0.21: fixed in 8.0.21
—
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-musl-arm648.0.0 ... 8.0.8 (20 versions)
  • 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107 up to 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107: fixed in 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107
  • 9.0.0 up to 9.0.10: fixed in 9.0.10
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.0.21: fixed in 8.0.21
—
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-musl-x648.0.0 ... 8.0.8 (20 versions)
  • 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107 up to 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107: fixed in 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107
  • 9.0.0 up to 9.0.10: fixed in 9.0.10
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.0.21: fixed in 8.0.21
—
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.linux-x648.0.0 ... 8.0.8 (20 versions)
  • 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107 up to 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107: fixed in 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107
  • 9.0.0 up to 9.0.10: fixed in 9.0.10
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.0.21: fixed in 8.0.21
—
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.osx-arm648.0.0 ... 8.0.8 (20 versions)
  • 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107 up to 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107: fixed in 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107
  • 9.0.0 up to 9.0.10: fixed in 9.0.10
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.0.21: fixed in 8.0.21
—
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.osx-x648.0.0 ... 8.0.8 (20 versions)
  • 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107 up to 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107: fixed in 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107
  • 9.0.0 up to 9.0.10: fixed in 9.0.10
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.0.21: fixed in 8.0.21
—
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-arm10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107
  • 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107 up to 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107: fixed in 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107
  • 9.0.0 up to 9.0.10: fixed in 9.0.10
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.0.21: fixed in 8.0.21
—
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-arm648.0.0 ... 8.0.8 (20 versions)
  • 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107 up to 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107: fixed in 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107
  • 9.0.0 up to 9.0.10: fixed in 9.0.10
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.0.21: fixed in 8.0.21
—
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-x648.0.0 ... 8.0.8 (20 versions)
  • 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107 up to 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107: fixed in 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107
  • 9.0.0 up to 9.0.10: fixed in 9.0.10
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.0.21: fixed in 8.0.21
—
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App.Runtime.win-x868.0.0 ... 8.0.8 (20 versions)
  • 10.0.0-rc.1.25451.107 up to 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107: fixed in 10.0.0-rc.2.25502.107
  • 9.0.0 up to 9.0.10: fixed in 9.0.10
  • 8.0.0 up to 8.0.21: fixed in 8.0.21
—
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Server.Kestrel.Core0.0.1-alpha ... 2.3.0 (22 versions)
  • every version up to 2.3.6: fixed in 2.3.6
—
Alpine:v3.21(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
dotnet8-runtime—
  • every version up to 8.0.21-r0: fixed in 8.0.21-r0
—
dotnet9-runtime—
  • every version up to 9.0.10-r0: fixed in 9.0.10-r0
—
Alpine:v3.22(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
dotnet8-runtime—
  • every version up to 8.0.21-r0: fixed in 8.0.21-r0
—
dotnet9-runtime—
  • every version up to 9.0.10-r0: fixed in 9.0.10-r0
—
Alpine:v3.23(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
dotnet8-runtime—
  • every version up to 8.0.21-r0: fixed in 8.0.21-r0
—
dotnet9-runtime—
  • every version up to 9.0.10-r0: fixed in 9.0.10-r0
—
Alpine:v3.24(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
dotnet8-runtime—
  • every version up to 8.0.21-r0: fixed in 8.0.21-r0
—
dotnet9-runtime—
  • every version up to 9.0.10-r0: fixed in 9.0.10-r0
—
Alpine:v3.20(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
dotnet8-runtime—
  • every version up to 8.0.21-r0: fixed in 8.0.21-r0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(10)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 68× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 245 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 145 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 17:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 17:13 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-12 17:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  4. 2026-11-12 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 17:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-11 17:37 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-11 17:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  8. 2026-11-11 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-11-10 18:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 18:01 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-10 18:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  12. 2026-11-10 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  13. 2026-11-09 18:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-09 18:25 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-09 18:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  16. 2026-11-09 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  17. 2026-11-08 18:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-08 18:49 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-08 18:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  20. 2026-11-07 19:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-07 19:13 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-07 19:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  23. 2026-11-07 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  24. 2026-11-06 19:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-06 19:29 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-06 19:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  2. 2026-11-06 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  3. 2026-11-05 19:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-05 19:52 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-05 19:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  6. 2026-11-05 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  7. 2026-11-05 15:55 UTCOSV refresh
  8. 2026-11-04 20:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-04 20:16 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-04 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  11. 2026-11-04 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-11-03 20:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-03 20:40 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-03 20:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  15. 2026-11-03 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  16. 2026-11-02 21:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-02 21:03 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-02 21:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  19. 2026-11-01 21:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-01 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-01 21:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  22. 2026-11-01 08:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5rrx-jjjq-q2r5 · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.9
  23. 2026-11-01 08:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-31 21:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-31 21:50 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-31 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  27. 2026-10-30 22:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-30 22:15 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-10-30 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  30. 2026-10-29 22:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-29 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-10-28 22:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-28 22:53 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-28 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  35. 2026-10-27 23:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-27 23:18 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-27 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  38. 2026-10-26 23:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-26 23:41 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-26 16:30 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  41. 2026-10-25 20:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-25 20:29 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-25 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  44. 2026-10-25 16:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-24 20:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-24 20:52 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-24 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  48. 2026-10-23 21:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-23 21:16 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-22 21:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-22 21:38 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-22 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  53. 2026-10-21 22:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-21 22:01 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-21 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  56. 2026-10-20 22:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-20 22:25 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-20 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  59. 2026-10-19 22:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-19 22:43 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-19 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 67% · 99th percentile
  62. 2026-10-18 21:30 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-18 16:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-18 16:40 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-18 05:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-17 19:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-17 19:41 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-17 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 66% · 99th percentile
  69. 2026-10-16 20:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-16 20:02 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-16 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 66% · 99th percentile
  72. 2026-10-15 17:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-15 17:35 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-14 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 66% · 99th percentile
  75. 2026-10-14 11:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Publicly available exploits

(6 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Exploit-DB entry, 3 GitHub PoCs), as are 2 GitHub checker repositories. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. Defenders should treat patch urgency accordingly.

  • Exploit-DBEDB-52492
    Published Apr 6, 2026

    ASP.net 8.0.10 - Bypass

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCZemarKhos/CVE-2025-55315-PoC-Exploit
    Published Nov 11, 2025

    CVE-2025-55315 PoC Exploit

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub checkerjlinebau/CVE-2025-55315-Scanner-Monitor
    Published Oct 24, 2025

    Quick and Simple Scripts to Scan for Vulnerable Servers and Packet Level Monitors

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoC7huukdlnkjkjba/CVE-2025-55315-
    Published Oct 19, 2025

    专业级HTTP请求走私漏洞利用与自动化渗透测试工具

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub checkernickcopi/CVE-2025-55315-detection-playground
    Published Oct 16, 2025

    Playground to experiment with different behavior on patched/unpatched Kestrel for the CVE-2025-55315 HTTP smuggling vulnerability

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCsirredbeard/CVE-2025-55315-repro
    Published Oct 16, 2025

    Tool that reproduces CVE-2025-55315 in ASP.NET Core.

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2025-55315?
CVE-2025-55315 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 14, 2025. Inconsistent interpretation of http requests ('http request/response smuggling') in ASP.NET Core allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
When was CVE-2025-55315 made public?
CVE-2025-55315 was made public on October 14, 2025: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Microsoft Corporation, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on October 14, 2025. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 18, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2025-55315 actively exploited?
CVE-2025-55315 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. EchelonGraph's EG-KEV model places it in Tier 2 (Weaponized), which is not evidence of exploitation: CISA's SSVC data says a public PoC exists and its EPSS is 50% or more. EchelonGraph does not test whether exploit code works. FIRST EPSS estimates a 67% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (99th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2025-55315?
CVE-2025-55315 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.9 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2025-55315?
A fix for CVE-2025-55315 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2025-55315 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2025-55315

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2025-55315?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.