CVE-2026-9697

HIGHPre-NVD 7.47.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.4 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5%, top 63% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.4Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Impact: undici's ProxyAgent silently drops the requestTls option when configured with a SOCKS5 proxy URI (socks5:// or socks://). The target HTTPS connection through the SOCKS5 tunnel falls back to Node's default trust store, ignoring user-configured ca, cert, key, rejectUnauthorized, and servername settings.

Applications that pin to an internal or corporate CA via requestTls.ca will, when their proxy URI is SOCKS5, get the default Mozilla CA bundle as the trust anchor instead. Any cert signed by any publicly-trusted CA for the target hostname is accepted, breaking the intended pin and enabling MITM read and tamper of the HTTPS exchange.

Affected applications are those that use undici's ProxyAgent (or Socks5ProxyAgent directly) with SOCKS5 AND rely on requestTls for TLS scope restriction. The bug was introduced in undici 7.23.0 when SOCKS5 support was added.

Patches: Upgrade to undici v7.28.0 or v8.5.0.

Workarounds: No workaround is available within the SOCKS5 path. If a SOCKS5 proxy with TLS scope restriction is required and an upgrade is not yet possible, route the traffic through an HTTP-proxy ProxyAgent instead, where requestTls is honored correctly.

CVSS v3
7.4
EG Score
7.4(medium)
EG Risk
33(Track)
EG Risk 33/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity74% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
37%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 17, 2026

Last Modified

July 21, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jun 17, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github.
github Patch Available

undici vulnerable to TLS certificate validation bypass via dropped requestTls in SOCKS5 ProxyAgent · Advisory · nodejs/undici · GitHub

https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-vmh5-mc38-953g
generic

Security Advisories | OpenJS Foundation CVE Numbering Authority

https://cna.openjsf.org/security-advisories.html

Patch Availability(12)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:17842109212026-07-20redhat
redhatopenshift4/ose-monitoring-plugin-rhel9:17833063962026-07-16redhat
redhatnodejs:24-8100020260630152626.6d8804032026-07-15redhat
redhatnodejs24-main-24.18.0-0.3.hum12026-07-11redhat
redhatdevspaces/pluginregistry-rhel9:17829893672026-07-08redhat
redhatrhdh/rhdh-hub-rhel9:17834481842026-07-08redhat
redhatnodejs:24-9080020260626074955.rhel92026-07-06redhat
redhatnodejs24-1:24.18.0-1.el10_22026-07-06redhat
redhatcluster-observability-operator/troubleshooting-panel-console-plugin-rhel9:17828394942026-07-01redhat
redhatrust-main-1.96.0-1.hum12026-06-03redhat
redhatnodejs26-main-26.3.0-1.2.hum12026-06-02redhat
redhatnodejs25-main-25.9.0-1.1.hum12026-04-10redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
npm(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
undici8.5.0

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 72× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-27 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-07-26 19:04 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-07-26 19:04 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-23 03:23 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-19 14:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-07-19 02:29 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-18 10:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-16 21:38 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-07-16 17:03 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-16 08:48 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-07-15 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-07-15 16:57 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-07-15 08:07 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-07-15 02:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-14 19:44 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-07-14 06:36 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-07-13 22:31 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-07-13 18:14 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-07-13 06:13 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-13 05:50 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-07-12 17:26 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-07-12 05:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-07-12 05:06 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-07-11 16:44 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-07-11 08:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-07-11 04:23 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-07-10 15:55 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-07-10 02:59 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-07-09 19:10 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-07-09 14:12 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-07-09 01:51 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-07-08 15:16 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-08 13:06 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-07-07 23:38 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-07-07 13:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-07 11:16 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-07-06 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-07-06 16:27 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-06 10:30 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-07-06 02:23 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-05 21:10 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-07-05 08:45 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-07-05 02:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-07-04 20:23 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-07-04 08:02 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-07-04 06:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-07-03 19:39 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-07-03 07:19 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-07-02 18:57 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-07-02 06:36 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-07-01 18:14 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-07-01 15:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-07-01 05:53 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-06-30 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-06-30 17:23 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-06-30 04:59 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-06-29 16:37 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-06-29 14:06 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-06-29 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-06-28 15:55 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-06-28 14:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-06-28 04:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-06-28 03:34 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-06-27 15:14 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-06-27 03:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  49. 2026-06-27 02:52 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-06-26 14:30 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-06-26 02:06 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-06-25 13:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-06-25 13:46 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-06-25 01:25 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-06-24 14:05 UTCEPSS rescore
  56. 2026-06-24 13:05 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-06-24 00:41 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-06-23 21:33 UTCEPSS rescore
  59. 2026-06-23 12:19 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-06-22 23:56 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-06-22 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-06-22 11:27 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-06-21 22:57 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-06-21 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  65. 2026-06-21 10:36 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-06-21 01:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-06-20 22:14 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-06-20 09:51 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-06-19 21:27 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-06-19 19:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-06-19 09:02 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-06-18 20:40 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-06-18 17:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  74. 2026-06-17 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-06-17 19:50 UTCNVD updatefirst tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-9697?
CVE-2026-9697 is a high vulnerability published on June 17, 2026. Impact: undici's ProxyAgent silently drops the requestTls option when configured with a SOCKS5 proxy URI (socks5:// or socks://). The target HTTPS connection through the SOCKS5 tunnel falls back to Node's default trust store, ignoring user-configured ca, cert, key, rejectUnauthorized, and…
When was CVE-2026-9697 disclosed?
CVE-2026-9697 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 17, 2026, with the most recent update on July 21, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-9697 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-9697 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 62.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-9697?
CVE-2026-9697 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.4 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-9697?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-9697, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-9697

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-9697?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.