CVE-2026-9076

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-06-09. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

Issue summary: When CMS password-based decryption (RFC 3211 / PWRI key unwrap) processes attacker-supplied CMS data, an attacker-chosen stream-mode KEK cipher can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read in kek_unwrap_key().

Impact summary: A heap buffer over-read may trigger a crash which leads to Denial of Service for an application if the input buffer ends at a memory page boundary and the following page is unmapped. There is no information disclosure as the over-read bytes are not revealed to the attacker.

The key unwrapping function performs a check-byte test as specified in the RFC that reads 7 bytes from a heap allocation that is based on the wrapped key length from the message. There is a minimum length check based on the block length of the wrapping cipher. However the cipher is selected from an OID carried in the attacker's PWRI keyEncryptionAlgorithm with no requirement that the cipher be a block cipher. When an attacker selects a stream-mode cipher the guard will be ineffective and the allocated buffer containing the unwrapped key can be too small to fit the check-bytes specified in the RFC and a buffer over-read can happen.

Applications calling CMS_decrypt() or CMS_decrypt_set1_password() (equivalently openssl cms -decrypt -pwri_password ...) on untrusted CMS data are vulnerable to this issue. No password knowledge is required: the over-read happens during the unwrap attempt before any authentication succeeds.

The over-read is limited to a few bytes and is not written to output, so there is no information disclosure. Triggering a crash requires the allocation to border unmapped memory, which is unlikely with the normal allocator.

The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(medium)
EG Risk
39(Track)
EG Risk 39/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
52%
KEV
Not listed

Published

June 9, 2026

Last Modified

July 23, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Jun 9, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.

Patch Availability(8)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntuopenssl (1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm16) @ xenial2026-09-14ubuntu
ubuntuopenssl (3.0.13-0ubuntu3.11) @ noble2026-09-14ubuntu
redhatrhui5/rhua-tp-rhel9:17872412602026-08-24redhat
redhatinsights-proxy/insights-proxy-container-rhel9:17828905032026-07-01redhat
redhatdiscovery/discovery-ui-rhel9:17821669522026-06-24redhat
redhatrhui5/rhua-rhel9:17815257392026-06-16redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.5-4.el10_22026-06-11redhat
redhatopenssl-1:3.5.5-4.el9_82026-06-11redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(7 across 7 ecosystems)
Alpine:v3.22(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.7-r0
Alpine:v3.23(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.7-r0
Alpine:v3.24(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.7-r0
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl1.1.1k-1 ... 1.1.1w-0~deb11u1 (23 versions)1.1.1w-0+deb11u8
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.0.10-1 ... 3.0.9-1 (22 versions)3.0.20-1~deb12u2
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.1-1 ... 3.5.6-1~deb13u1 (11 versions)3.5.6-1~deb13u2
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
openssl3.5.1-1 ... 3.6.2-1 (21 versions)3.6.3-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(2)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 51× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 350 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-14 04:36 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-14 04:36 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-14 04:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-13 16:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-11 09:38 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-10 09:35 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-31 00:55 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-31 00:55 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-31 00:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-30 19:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-25 00:50 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-25 00:50 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-08-25 00:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-08-23 23:36 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-08-23 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-23 11:14 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-23 11:14 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-08-23 11:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-21 20:18 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-08-21 20:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-21 08:38 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-08-21 08:38 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-08-21 08:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-20 20:58 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-08-20 20:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-20 09:19 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-20 09:19 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-20 09:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  30. 2026-08-17 12:35 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-08-17 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-08-17 00:45 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-08-17 00:45 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-08-17 00:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-16 12:14 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-08-16 12:14 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-08-16 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-16 00:36 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-16 00:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-15 11:29 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-15 11:29 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-15 11:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-15 01:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-14 21:39 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-14 21:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-14 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-08-14 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  51. 2026-08-13 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-08-13 22:21 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-13 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-13 22:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  55. 2026-08-13 07:56 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-13 07:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-12 19:23 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-08-12 19:23 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-08-12 19:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-12 13:51 UTCEPSS rescore
  61. 2026-08-12 07:42 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-12 07:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-11 20:03 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-11 20:03 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-11 20:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-11 13:43 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-08-11 08:23 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-08-11 08:23 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-08-11 08:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-08-11 00:00 UTCEPSS rescore
  71. 2026-08-10 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-08-10 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-10 05:02 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-10 05:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-09 17:23 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-9076?
CVE-2026-9076 is a high vulnerability published on June 9, 2026. Issue summary: When CMS password-based decryption (RFC 3211 / PWRI key unwrap) processes attacker-supplied CMS data, an attacker-chosen stream-mode KEK cipher can trigger a heap out-of-bounds read in kekunwrapkey(). Impact summary: A heap buffer over-read may trigger a crash which leads to Denial…
When was CVE-2026-9076 disclosed?
CVE-2026-9076 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on June 9, 2026, with the most recent update on July 23, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-9076 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-9076 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 48.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-9076?
CVE-2026-9076 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-9076?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-9076, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-9076

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-9076?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.