CVE-2026-90413

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-82074 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.8%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

IB/isert: reject login PDUs declaring more data than was received

isert_login_recv_done() records how many bytes the HCA actually placed in the login buffer, but nothing compares that against the length the login PDU's BHS declares. isert_rx_login_req() copies min(login_req_len, MAX_KEY_VALUE_PAIRS) bytes into login->req_buf, and the login code then reads the declared length back out of that buffer - for the first PDU in iscsi_target_locate_portal(),

payload_length = ntoh24(login_req->dlength); tmpbuf = kmemdup_nul(login->req_buf, payload_length, GFP_KERNEL);

and for the ones after it in iscsi_decode_text_input(), reached from iscsi_target_do_login().

login->req_buf is a fixed MAX_KEY_VALUE_PAIRS (8192) byte allocation, so an initiator that declares more than it sends reads off the end of it, before authentication and with the length under its control:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kmemdup_nul+0x43/0x80 Read of size 8193 at addr ffff8881056a8000 by task iscsi_np/167 __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 kmemdup_nul+0x43/0x80 iscsi_target_locate_portal+0x48d/0x1180 iscsi_target_login_thread+0x19a9/0x3350 Allocated by task 167: __kmalloc_cache_noprof+0x158/0x370 iscsi_target_login_thread+0x971/0x3350 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-8k of size 8192 allocated 8192-byte region

Falsifying the second login PDU instead reaches the other reader, on the same buffer:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in kmemdup_nul+0x43/0x80 Read of size 8193 at addr ffff888104d10000 by task kworker/1:1/50 Workqueue: isert_login_wq iscsi_target_do_login_rx __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 kmemdup_nul+0x43/0x80 iscsi_decode_text_input+0xc6/0x11c0 iscsi_target_do_login+0x261/0x1470 iscsi_target_do_login_rx+0x51d/0x7d0

iscsit over TCP is not exposed: iscsit_get_login_rx() validates the declared length with iscsi_target_check_login_request() and then reads exactly that many bytes off the socket, so the declared length governs how much arrives rather than how much is copied out of an already-filled buffer. isert does not call iscsi_target_check_login_request() at all.

Reject a login PDU whose declared DataSegmentLength exceeds what was received, in both paths that reach isert_rx_login_req(): isert_get_login_rx() for the first login PDU and isert_login_recv_done() for the ones after it. dlength <= login_req_len is allowed because the received count can include up to three bytes of iSCSI padding.

Once the check is in place the copy out can no longer exceed the copy in: the posted login SGE is ISER_RX_PAYLOAD_SIZE, so login_req_len cannot exceed MAX_KEY_VALUE_PAIRS and the min() in isert_rx_login_req() is login_req_len.

Like the existing short-PDU check added by 29e7b925ae6d, the reject in isert_login_recv_done() returns without completing login_req_comp, so a malformed subsequent PDU leaves the login to be torn down by the login timer rather than failing immediately. The first-PDU path returns an error and fails straight away.

Reproduced on 7.2.0-rc4 with soft-RoCE (rdma_rxe) under KASAN, using an initiator that sends the real key=value payload while declaring 8193 in the BHS, on the first login PDU and on the second in separate runs. The reported read size tracks the declared value exactly; 16384 and 61440 behave the same. Unpatched 3 of 3 runs report on each of the two paths, patched 0 of 3 on both, run alternately in a single session, and a normal login still completes on the patched build.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
41
EG Risk 41/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.8% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.8%
EPSS %ILE
58th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.8% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

IB/isert: reject login PDUs declaring more data than was received - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2488b5b4827e5415768afc8daf097e8eb83c98df
Web page

IB/isert: reject login PDUs declaring more data than was received - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/48812c8103071d550d9ab4a3431be5bdc52255bc
Web page

IB/isert: reject login PDUs declaring more data than was received - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c345d9d0b3eefc990bb90cf565325785aab06aab
Web page

IB/isert: reject login PDUs declaring more data than was received - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/71ec8bbfa4a183f1e623662f9cfbcd702e433bdb
Web page

IB/isert: reject login PDUs declaring more data than was received - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/44fe800ec13386c88bd5b32bcd1deaa1e17535d5
Web page

IB/isert: reject login PDUs declaring more data than was received - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d9c0586af703890afe1bd0cfe641e3a3af1c32d
Web page

IB/isert: reject login PDUs declaring more data than was received - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/228aaa620fe6a7bc8b5b21dd348b4836b1760c61
Web page

IB/isert: reject login PDUs declaring more data than was received - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1f3313e7b3e396e4985fea5c709477387e0a065

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90413(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(16)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (57 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.190-1: fixed in 6.1.190-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (180 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(15)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 80× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 434 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 334 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 04:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 04:41 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-12 04:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  5. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  6. 2026-11-11 02:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-11 02:57 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-11 02:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  9. 2026-11-10 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  10. 2026-11-10 01:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-10 01:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  12. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  13. 2026-11-08 23:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-08 23:22 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-08 23:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  16. 2026-11-08 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  17. 2026-11-07 21:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-07 21:37 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-07 21:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  20. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  21. 2026-11-06 21:25 UTCOSV refresh
  22. 2026-11-06 19:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-06 19:53 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-11-06 19:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  25. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 18:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-05 18:09 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-05 18:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  4. 2026-11-05 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  5. 2026-11-04 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 58th percentile
  6. 2026-11-04 16:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-04 16:25 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-04 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  9. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  10. 2026-11-03 14:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-03 14:40 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-03 14:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  13. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  14. 2026-11-02 12:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-02 12:36 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-02 12:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  17. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  18. 2026-11-01 10:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-01 10:52 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-01 10:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  21. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  22. 2026-10-31 09:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-31 09:07 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-31 09:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  25. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  26. 2026-10-30 07:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-30 07:23 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-30 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  29. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  30. 2026-10-29 05:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-29 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  32. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  33. 2026-10-28 03:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-28 03:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  35. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  36. 2026-10-27 01:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-27 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  38. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  39. 2026-10-25 20:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-25 20:13 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-25 20:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  42. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 57th percentile
  43. 2026-10-25 13:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-24 18:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-24 18:29 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-24 18:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  47. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  48. 2026-10-23 16:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-23 16:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  50. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  51. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  52. 2026-10-22 14:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-22 14:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  54. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  55. 2026-10-21 13:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-21 13:14 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-21 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  58. 2026-10-20 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  59. 2026-10-20 11:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-20 11:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  61. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  62. 2026-10-19 09:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  63. 2026-10-19 09:28 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-10-19 09:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  65. 2026-10-19 09:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-19 09:10 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-19 09:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  68. 2026-10-18 20:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-10-18 20:17 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-10-18 20:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1
  71. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 56th percentile
  72. 2026-10-18 03:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-17 18:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-17 18:33 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-17 18:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-3r7q-5rxg-29mw · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.1

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-90413?
CVE-2026-90413 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 17, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: IB/isert: reject login PDUs declaring more data than was received isert_login_recv_done() records how many bytes the HCA actually placed in the login buffer, but nothing compares that against the length the login PDU's BHS…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-90413 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-90413 was published on September 17, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-90413 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-90413 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.8% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (58th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90413?
CVE-2026-90413 has a CVSS base score of 9.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90413?
A fix for CVE-2026-90413 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-90413 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-90413

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90413?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.