CVE-2026-90224

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-17. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-81817 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.4%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfc: nci: fix double completion race in nci_data_exchange_complete

nci_close_device() and nci_rx_work can both call nci_data_exchange_complete() concurrently. After commit 4527025d440ce8 ("nfc: nci: fix circular locking dependency in nci_close_device") moved flush_workqueue(ndev->rx_wq) after mutex_unlock(&ndev->req_lock), rx_work is no longer serialized with the explicit completion call in the close path. Both callers read the non-NULL callback pointer and invoke rawsock_data_exchange_complete(), which calls sock_put() -- but only one sock_hold() was taken, so the second sock_put() underflows the refcount and frees the socket while it is still in use.

Replace the bare clear_bit(NCI_DATA_EXCHANGE) with test_and_clear_bit() so that only the first caller proceeds to invoke the callback.

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
34
EG Risk 34/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.4% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.4%
EPSS %ILE
29th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.4% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 17, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Sep 18, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

nfc: nci: fix double completion race in nci_data_exchange_complete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ee08414d78b851e3d1856d6e4d631939b01a1bbe
Web page

nfc: nci: fix double completion race in nci_data_exchange_complete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cf646a9f5554bc07d6ccb59c327812b3a0c6a368
Web page

nfc: nci: fix double completion race in nci_data_exchange_complete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bfdf412208fea7fc0d5b32d68a35b25261917393
Web page

nfc: nci: fix double completion race in nci_data_exchange_complete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ba4c776af3dc21ed04e315e6545e99703bb1b53a
Web page

nfc: nci: fix double completion race in nci_data_exchange_complete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9030a1bbe2c6b1e3e54cef462d159b5248f09fd2
Web page

nfc: nci: fix double completion race in nci_data_exchange_complete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8265a626cc14a48e46e6dc8c47667e72b4232ac2
Web page

nfc: nci: fix double completion race in nci_data_exchange_complete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/588ccd19a6e69eca72d54608c3ab3b45709b2305
Web page

nfc: nci: fix double completion race in nci_data_exchange_complete - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3f075832734005310740d148d1cf1c1e792ebdca

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-90224(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(15)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (57 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.190-1: fixed in 6.1.190-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (180 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(15)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 36× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 150 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 50 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 21:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-11 21:09 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-11 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  5. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  6. 2026-11-10 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  7. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  8. 2026-11-08 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  9. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  10. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  11. 2026-11-04 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 07:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-04 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  14. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  15. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  16. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  17. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  18. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  19. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  20. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  21. 2026-10-27 18:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-27 18:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  23. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  24. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 29th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-25 13:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  3. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  4. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  5. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 28th percentile
  6. 2026-10-20 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  7. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  8. 2026-10-19 09:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-10-19 09:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  10. 2026-10-19 09:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-10-19 09:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  12. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  13. 2026-10-18 03:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-17 18:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-17 18:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  16. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  17. 2026-10-16 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  18. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  19. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  20. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  21. 2026-10-13 04:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-13 04:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  23. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  24. 2026-10-12 14:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-12 05:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  26. 2026-10-11 19:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  27. 2026-10-11 16:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-10-11 16:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-11 16:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  30. 2026-10-11 13:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  31. 2026-10-11 13:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-11 03:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-11 03:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  34. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  35. 2026-10-10 14:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  36. 2026-10-10 01:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-10 01:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  38. 2026-10-09 20:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  39. 2026-10-09 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  40. 2026-10-08 23:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-08 23:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  42. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  43. 2026-10-08 10:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-08 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  45. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  46. 2026-10-07 22:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  47. 2026-10-07 10:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  48. 2026-10-06 21:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-06 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  50. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  51. 2026-10-06 09:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  52. 2026-10-05 20:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-05 20:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  54. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  55. 2026-10-05 08:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-05 08:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  57. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  58. 2026-10-04 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  59. 2026-10-04 07:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  60. 2026-10-03 19:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-03 19:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  62. 2026-10-03 06:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  63. 2026-10-02 18:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-02 18:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  65. 2026-10-02 06:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-02 06:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  67. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 27th percentile
  68. 2026-10-01 17:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  69. 2026-10-01 05:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  70. 2026-09-30 16:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-09-30 16:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  72. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 26th percentile
  73. 2026-09-30 04:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  74. 2026-09-29 15:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-29 15:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xj24-p6ph-p2w7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-90224?
CVE-2026-90224 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 17, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfc: nci: fix double completion race in nci_data_exchange_complete nci_close_device() and nci_rx_work can both call nci_data_exchange_complete() concurrently. After commit 4527025d440ce8 ("nfc: nci: fix circular locking dependency…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-90224 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-90224 was published on September 17, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-90224 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-90224 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.4% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (29th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-90224?
CVE-2026-90224 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-90224?
A fix for CVE-2026-90224 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-90224 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-90224

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-90224?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.