CVE-2026-89669

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-09-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — Patch released this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-76581 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it

nfsd4_copy_notify() finished initializing the cpntf state after nfs4_alloc_init_cpntf_state() had already linked it into the s2s_cp_stateids IDR and the parent's sc_cp_list, with cs_count == 1 (the membership reference) and none held for the caller. A racing OFFLOAD_CANCEL (crafted cl_id == nn->s2s_cp_cl_id plus the guessable so_id) could reach manage_cpntf_state() and free the entry, turning the caller's subsequent cpn_cnr_stateid read and cp_p_stateid/cp_p_clid writes into use-after-free. The owning clientid was also only recorded after publication, so it could not gate an ownership check in that window.

Record cp_p_stateid and cp_p_clid inside nfs4_alloc_init_cpntf_state() before nfs4_init_cp_state() publishes the entry, and return it with an extra reference. The caller reads the stateid under that reference and drops it with nfs4_put_cpntf_state(); on a late error the laundromat reaps the entry.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
53rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Nov 7, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e08a3dcaca0505f861e344a387f37f94d95dbdc2
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d18d36395d973ef7372c8e6724970585f75b5c0b
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a4d7fedcaaf33e60a01e53eafca9041ef966212f
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9caad13b7cfe9ccb90cc405ac77335800e086595
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/863b6e995665472f2af5be2436a874ab6a9e5ac6
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4cdef96892f4fa6e70c405b6e8f2fd6972f3b64b
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4415a692346a39fdb647cbd717eda510159aaf55
Web page

nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/129643893b79f8a3c6b72045f933fbab5ee424ca

Patch Availability(21)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-264.14.1.el10_32026-11-11redhat
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-6.8 (6.8.0-2056.58) @ noble2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1038.42) @ noble2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-20.04-edge (5.15.0.202.174) @ jammy2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-42.42) @ resolute2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1124.133) @ jammy2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-6.8.1 (6.8.1-1064.65) @ noble2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-nolpae (5.15.0.1113.111) @ jammy2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-vmware-tools-6.8.0-1010 (6.8.0-1010.10) @ noble2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-6.8 (6.8.0-1071.78~22.04.1) @ jammy2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1067.70.1) @ noble2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1071.78) @ noble2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-64k-6.8 (6.8.0-1067.70) @ noble2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-realtime-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-43.43.1) @ resolute2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1017.17) @ resolute2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-5.15 (5.15.0.1070.72~20.04.1) @ focal2026-11-11ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-26.04 (7.0.0-1020.21) @ resolute2026-11-11ubuntu
redhatopenshift/ose-rhel-coreos-9:4.22.9.8.202610241758-02026-10-27redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.64.1.el10_22026-10-08redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.56.1.el9_82026-10-08redhat
linuxKernel @ 5.10.270 (fixes >=5.6.0)—osv

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (57 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.190-1: fixed in 6.1.190-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (180 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(16)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 21× in last 7d / 93× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 493 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 393 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 23:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 23:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-11 23:45 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-11 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-11 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 00:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-11 00:13 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-11 00:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  12. 2026-11-10 00:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-10 00:41 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-10 00:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  16. 2026-11-09 01:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-09 01:13 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-09 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-11-08 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  20. 2026-11-08 01:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-08 01:43 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-08 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  24. 2026-11-07 02:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-07 02:15 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 02:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  2. 2026-11-06 21:25 UTCOSV refresh
  3. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  4. 2026-11-06 02:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-06 02:47 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-06 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-05 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  8. 2026-11-05 03:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-05 03:19 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-05 03:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-04 16:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 03:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-04 03:51 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-11-04 03:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  15. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  16. 2026-11-03 04:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-03 04:23 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-03 04:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  20. 2026-11-02 04:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-02 04:42 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-02 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  24. 2026-11-01 05:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-11-01 05:13 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-11-01 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  28. 2026-10-31 05:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-31 05:45 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-31 05:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  32. 2026-10-30 06:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-30 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-30 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  36. 2026-10-29 06:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-29 06:50 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-29 06:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  40. 2026-10-28 07:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-28 07:19 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-28 07:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  44. 2026-10-27 07:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-27 07:51 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-27 07:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  48. 2026-10-26 05:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-26 05:48 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-26 05:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  51. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  52. 2026-10-25 13:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-25 06:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-25 06:20 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-10-25 06:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  56. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  57. 2026-10-24 06:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-24 06:52 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-24 06:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  60. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  61. 2026-10-23 07:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-23 07:24 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-10-23 07:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  64. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  65. 2026-10-22 07:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-10-22 07:52 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-22 07:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  69. 2026-10-21 08:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-21 08:24 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-21 08:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  72. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
  73. 2026-10-20 08:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-20 08:55 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-10-20 08:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-76rg-3h22-jw6r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89669?
CVE-2026-89669 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfsd: initialize copy-notify stateid before publishing it nfsd4_copy_notify() finished initializing the cpntf state after nfs4_alloc_init_cpntf_state() had already linked it into the s2s_cp_stateids IDR and the parent's sc_cp_list,…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89669 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89669 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89669 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89669 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (53rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89669?
CVE-2026-89669 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89669?
A fix for CVE-2026-89669 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89669 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89669

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89669?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.