CVE-2026-79983

CRITICALNVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 1.0% (63rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 7.4 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2026-10-19) is not newer than that change (2026-11-03), so it does not.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — Patch released this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-104220 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1.0%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Apache Software Foundation) states them: "Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1."

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Camel FTP component.

This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.

The Camel remote-file consumers poll a directory on a remote server and build the absolute remote path of each file by concatenating the configured directory with the file name reported in the server's directory listing. That concatenation (FtpUtils.absoluteFilePath and GenericFileConsumer) applied no lexical normalization and no check that the result stayed inside the directory being polled, and the resulting path became the operand for every subsequent remote operation on the file: retrieval (FtpOperations.retrieveFile / SftpOperations, reached from GenericFileConsumer where the retrieve name is taken verbatim from GenericFile.getAbsoluteFilePath), deletion when delete=true (GenericFileDeleteProcessStrategy), and renaming when move, preMove, moveFailed or readLock=rename is configured (GenericFileProcessStrategySupport and GenericFileRenameExclusiveReadLockStrategy). Neither isValidFile nor isMatched performed any containment check. A listing entry that is not a single path segment therefore resolved to a path outside the configured polling directory, causing Camel to read, delete or rename files outside it using the endpoint's own credentials. A listing name is not route-controlled data. It is supplied by the remote server, and the FTP control channel carries no integrity protection at all, so an on-path attacker can rewrite a LIST response without holding any credentials; a compromised, malicious or multi-tenant server, or a server backed by a virtual filesystem, can emit such a name directly. Retrieval is reachable in a default consumer configuration, since the remote consumers download every listed file; deletion and renaming additionally require one of the disposition options above, all of which are common. Escape from the directory Camel was configured to poll is unconditional, while escape from the server's own account boundary additionally depends on whether that server confines the account. The jailStartingDirectory option, which is documented as restricting Camel to the starting directory and is enabled by default, governed producer writes and, since the localWorkDirectory containment work, consumer downloads to the local work directory - but it did not constrain this remote operand, so its name and description claimed a boundary that was not enforced here. The same entry point had already been recognised on the local side: the localWorkDirectory download path was constrained so that a remote file name containing parent-directory segments could not resolve outside the local work directory. The remote operand was the remaining half of that surface. This artifact provides the ftp, ftps and sftp schemes, all of which are affected. The reporter demonstrated the issue end to end against an ftp endpoint, driving a Camel route with a malicious server whose LIST response named a file outside the polled directory.

Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x stream reached end of life and does not receive this fix; users on it should move to a supported releases stream.

CVSS v3
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
57
EG Risk 57/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
1.0%
EPSS %ILE
63rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
1.0% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 19, 2026

Last Modified

November 3, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Oct 19, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr.
GitHub pull request

CAMEL-24487: sync the remote-file consumer containment note to the 4.22/4.18 upgrade guides

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25747 on 2026-08-26 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25747
GitHub pull request

[backport camel-4.18.x] CAMEL-24487: remote-file consumers - contain remote operations within the configured directory

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25746 on 2026-08-26 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25746
GitHub pull request

[backport camel-4.22.x] CAMEL-24487: remote-file consumers - contain remote operations within the configured directory

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25745 on 2026-08-26 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25745
GitHub pull request

CAMEL-24487: remote-file consumers - contain remote operations within the configured directory

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25730 on 2026-08-25 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25730
Web page

[CAMEL-24487] camel-ftp/sftp/mina-sftp/azure-files/smb: contain remote consumer operations within the configured directory - ASF Jira

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24487
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-79983 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-79983.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-79983(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatorg.apache.camel/camel-ftp:4.22.1.redhat-000082026-11-11redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 47× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-12 20:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-12 20:49 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-12 20:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  4. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 20:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-11 20:51 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-11 20:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  8. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  9. 2026-11-10 20:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 20:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  11. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  12. 2026-11-09 20:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-09 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  14. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  15. 2026-11-08 20:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-08 20:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  17. 2026-11-08 16:41 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  18. 2026-11-07 20:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-07 20:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  20. 2026-11-07 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  21. 2026-11-06 20:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-06 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  23. 2026-11-06 19:25 UTCOSV refresh
  24. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  25. 2026-11-05 20:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 43 more
  1. 2026-11-05 20:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  2. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  3. 2026-11-04 20:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-04 20:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  5. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 1.0% · 63rd percentile
  6. 2026-11-03 20:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored▲ 1.70
  7. 2026-11-03 20:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  8. 2026-11-03 20:46 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 9.1 · severity → CRITICAL
  9. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  10. 2026-11-03 11:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-03 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  12. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  13. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  14. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  15. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  16. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  17. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  18. 2026-10-27 19:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-27 19:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  20. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  21. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  22. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  23. 2026-10-25 13:59 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  26. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  27. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  28. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-20 14:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-20 14:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  31. 2026-10-20 13:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-20 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  33. 2026-10-20 04:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-20 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  35. 2026-10-20 04:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-20 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  37. 2026-10-19 21:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-19 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  39. 2026-10-19 17:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-19 17:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-vqcr-73j4-7wxf · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  41. 2026-10-19 11:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-19 10:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 7.4 HIGH
  43. 2026-10-19 10:23 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-79983?
CVE-2026-79983 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 19, 2026. Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Camel FTP component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. The Camel remote-file consumers poll a directory on a remote server and build the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-79983 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-79983 was published on October 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 3, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-79983 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-79983 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1.0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (63rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-79983?
CVE-2026-79983 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-79983?
A fix for CVE-2026-79983 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Apache Software Foundation) states them: "Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-79983 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-79983

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-79983?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.