CVE-2026-78164

HIGHPre-NVD 8.28.2
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.2; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — Patch released this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-104222 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-394j-cc2x-w9wm (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Apache Software Foundation) states them: "Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue."

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Camel HTTP, Netty HTTP, Undertow and Vert.x HTTP components.

This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.

The Camel HTTP producer families let an inbound message override the endpoint URI through the CamelHttpUri and CamelRestHttpUri headers, and then passed that message-supplied string through CamelContext.resolvePropertyPlaceholders() before using it. Property-placeholder resolution is a configuration-resolution facility, not a URI-parsing step: it reaches operating-system environment variables, JVM system properties, every PropertiesFunction registered on the classpath - including the secret functions - and, through camel-bean, the invocation of a no-argument method on any bean in the registry. Applying it to Exchange content therefore turned a URI string into a configuration- and bean-evaluation context. A route author opted into none of this: a plain static to("http://backend/api") was sufficient. Seven call sites were affected: HttpHelper.createURL and HttpHelper.createMethod in camel-http-common, HttpMethodHelper.createMethod in camel-http, VertxHttpHelper.resolveHttpURI in camel-vertx-http, UndertowHelper.createURL and UndertowHelper.createMethod in camel-undertow, and NettyHttpHelper.createURL in camel-netty-http. The bridgeEndpoint option did not bound the exposure: it suppresses the CamelHttpUri override in the createURL family but not in the createMethod family, so a route using the documented bridging configuration still resolved placeholders taken from the header, and CamelRestHttpUri was consumed before any bridgeEndpoint check in all four components. Only camel-http offered an opt-out, skipControlHeaders, which defaults to false. Reaching the headers did not always require header injection, because several Camel HTTP consumers populate CamelHttpUri from the request line themselves as a documented reverse-proxy feature. An unresolvable placeholder additionally produced a RuntimeExchangeException whose message echoed the URI, which distinguishes a set from an unset configuration key even where no outbound request is made. The behaviour predates the 4.x line. This advisory continues the alignment CAMEL-24282 applied to the toD and enrich dynamic-URI EIPs in 4.22.0, extending the same build-time-resolution contract to the HTTP producer components.

Users should upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. Users on the 4.18.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x releases stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on those lines must move to a supported release. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the override headers at the trust boundary before the producer with removeHeader("CamelHttpUri") and removeHeader("CamelRestHttpUri"), or set skipControlHeaders=true on camel-http endpoints, which is the only component offering that option. Note that bridgeEndpoint=true is not a workaround: it suppresses the header override when the outbound URL is built but not when the header is re-parsed for the query string. Percent-encoding the placeholder delimiters is likewise not a mitigation for camel-netty-http, whose binding decodes the request path before the value reaches the header, so proxy or WAF rules written against the raw delimiters do not help there. As defence in depth, ensure consumers exposed to untrusted senders apply a strict inbound HeaderFilterStrategy over the Camel namespace, and resolve secrets through a vault rather than through environment variables or system properties that a placeholder can name.

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
52
EG Risk 52/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity82% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.2 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
28th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.2): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.2 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.2 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.3% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-10). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Oct 19, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr, github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit 7cec534c6696 (apache/camel)

Fix landed in apache/camel commit 7cec534c6696 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/commit/7cec534c66969015d85e56631143174dd150ed94
GitHub commit

commit 9f8a185e315c (apache/camel)

Fix landed in apache/camel commit 9f8a185e315c — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/commit/9f8a185e315ce9e120889c4106be3dbf4688e507
GitHub commit

commit ba5aced7f6a1 (apache/camel)

Fix landed in apache/camel commit ba5aced7f6a1 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/commit/ba5aced7f6a1c38a963020575676ad4c76b492cf
GitHub pull request

CAMEL-24418: camel-http/http-common/netty-http/undertow/vertx-http - do not resolve property placeholders in HTTP URI override headers

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25571 on 2026-08-28 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25571
Web page

[CAMEL-24418] HTTP producers - do not resolve property placeholders in message-supplied endpoint-URI override headers - ASF Jira

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24418
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-78164 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-78164.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-78164(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatorg.apache.camel/camel-vertx-http:4.22.1.redhat-000082026-11-11redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 34× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 28th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 28th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 15:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-11-11 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-11-11 15:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-394j-cc2x-w9wm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  6. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 28th percentile
  7. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 28th percentile
  8. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 28th percentile
  9. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 28th percentile
  10. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 28th percentile
  11. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 28th percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 28th percentile
  13. 2026-11-04 05:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-04 05:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-394j-cc2x-w9wm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  15. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  16. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  17. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  18. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  19. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  20. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  21. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  22. 2026-10-27 19:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-27 19:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-394j-cc2x-w9wm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  24. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  25. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
Show 19 more
  1. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 27th percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 14:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 38th percentile
  4. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  5. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  6. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  7. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 37th percentile
  8. 2026-10-19 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-394j-cc2x-w9wm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  9. 2026-10-19 19:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-10-19 19:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-394j-cc2x-w9wm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  11. 2026-10-19 19:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-19 19:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-394j-cc2x-w9wm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  13. 2026-10-19 13:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-19 13:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-394j-cc2x-w9wm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  15. 2026-10-19 12:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-10-19 12:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-394j-cc2x-w9wm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.2
  17. 2026-10-19 11:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-19 10:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 8.2 HIGH
  19. 2026-10-19 10:23 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-78164?
CVE-2026-78164 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 19, 2026. Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine and Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Camel HTTP, Netty HTTP, Undertow and Vert.x HTTP components. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-78164 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-78164 was published on October 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-78164 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-78164 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (28th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-78164?
CVE-2026-78164 has a CVSS base score of 8.2 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-78164?
A fix for CVE-2026-78164 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. Fixed versions, as the CVE record's CNA (Apache Software Foundation) states them: "Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-78164 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-78164

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-78164?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.