“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.5 under CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4% (39th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
Also known asEUVD-2026-105004 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-38jj-69cp-9wgc (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD
A fix is available — apply it.
Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. If the OpenSSLLifecycleListener is configured to use FIPS mode but FIPS activation fails, Tomcat logs and error but continues to use JSSE in non-FIPS mode with the provided configuration.
This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M14 through 11.0.26, from 10.1.22 through 10.1.60, from 9.0.92 through 9.0.122.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.27, 10.1.61 or 9.0.123, which fix the issue.
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (6.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 6.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
October 20, 2026
October 29, 2026
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-74048
Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') vulnerability in Apache Tomcat. If the...
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fix (by version range) / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| redhat | tomcat10-main-10.1.61-0.1.hum1 | 2026-10-20 | redhat |
| redhat | tomcat11-main-11.0.27-0.1.hum1 | 2026-10-12 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat10 | 10.1.40-1 ... 10.1.60-1 (11 versions) |
| — |
| tomcat11 | 11.0.11-1 ... 11.0.6-1 (10 versions) |
| — |
| tomcat9 | — |
| — |
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat10 | 10.1.40-1 ... 10.1.60-1 (11 versions) |
| — |
| tomcat11 | 11.0.11-1 ... 11.0.6-1 (10 versions) |
| — |
| tomcat9 | — |
| — |
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fix by version range | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| tomcat10 | 10.1.10-1 ... 10.1.9-1 (37 versions) |
| — |
| tomcat9 | — |
| — |
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.
Debian:13:tomcat11
redhat:RHSA-2026:81365
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-74048
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.