python-cryptography is a package designed to expose cryptographic primitives and recipes to Python developers. In versions 42.0.0 through 48.0.0, when resolving invalid certificate chains that include duplicate copies of self-signed certificates, the processing recursively invokes the same candidate, leading to an exponential blowup. Although the limitation that the chain depth cannot exceed a specified maximum depth prevents unbounded recursion and guarantees termination, an attacker-controlled certificate chain can lead the processing to easily take more than 5s to reject in testing. This amplification could form the basis for a resource exhaustion denial of service attack. The core issue arises in the recursive nature of build_chain_inner, which does not de-duplicate against previously analyzed candidates. As the correctness of validation is not affected, the integrity of a system cannot be compromised through this vector, only its availability. This issue is fixed in 49.0.0.
CVE-2026-69249
This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 83% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 8.7
- EG Score
- 8.7(medium)
- EG Risk
- 70(Attend)EG Risk 70/100SSVC: Attend
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity87% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 17%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 3, 2026
Last Modified
September 10, 2026
Advisory Details (3)
Auto-updated Aug 3, 2026commit 4a12cf49675a (pyca/cryptography)
Fix landed in pyca/cryptography commit 4a12cf49675a — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/commit/4a12cf49675a184e47f912b00b04f3a629283582Add a signature validation budget during path construction
Fix merged in pyca/cryptography PR #14960 on 2026-06-07 — awaiting tagged release
https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/pull/14960Duplicate self-signed intermediates can cause exponential path-building · Advisory · pyca/cryptography · GitHub
https://github.com/pyca/cryptography/security/advisories/GHSA-jwv3-5hgf-82wwVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-69249(5)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
- RHSA-2026:64795Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: python3.14-cryptography security update
- RHSA-2026:64774Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: python3.14-cryptography security update
- RHSA-2026:55543Red Hat Product SecurityHigh
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- CVE-2026-69249Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)High
python-cryptography: Duplicate self-signed intermediates can cause exponential path-building
- GHSA-jwv3-5hgf-82wwGitHub Security AdvisoriesHigh
python-cryptography: Duplicate self-signed intermediates can cause exponential path-building
Patch Availability(4)
| Vendor / Ecosystem | Fixed in / Patch | Released | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| ubuntu | python3-cryptography (46.0.5-1ubuntu2.2) @ resolute | 2026-09-18 | ubuntu |
| redhat | python3.14-cryptography-0:45.0.4-4.el10_2.5 | 2026-09-08 | redhat |
| redhat | python3.14-cryptography-0:45.0.4-4.el9_8.6 | 2026-09-08 | redhat |
| redhat | python-cryptography-main-50.0.0-1.hum1 | 2026-08-17 | redhat |
Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.
Affected Packages
(5 across 5 ecosystems)
Debian:11(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-cryptography | 3.3.2-1 ... 49.0.0-2 (34 versions) | — | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-cryptography | 38.0.4-3 ... 49.0.0-2 (28 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-cryptography | 43.0.0-3 ... 49.0.0-2 (17 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| python-cryptography | 43.0.0-3 ... 49.0.0-1~exp1 (14 versions) | 49.0.0-1 | — |
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| cryptography | 0.1 ... 48.0.1 (156 versions) | 49.0.0 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Additional Vendor Advisories
(1)
Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 87× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
Showing the most recent 100 of 124 total refreshes for this CVE.
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 18:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 05:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 05:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 16:18 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 01:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 01:13 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 06:09 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 06:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 16:54 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 01:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 04:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 04:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 15:50 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 02:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 13:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 00:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 00:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 09:48 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 09:48 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 20:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 18:08 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-10 18:08 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-10 03:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-09 06:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 06:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-07 18:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 18:46 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 20:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 18:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 18:38 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 22:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 22:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 21:30 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 21:30 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 16:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 16:47 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-04 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-03 08:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-03 08:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 20:57 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 20:57 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-31 23:09 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-31 00:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-31 00:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-30 11:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-30 11:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-29 21:55 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-29 21:55 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-27 20:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-27 20:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-27 03:59 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 14:51 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-26 01:41 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-26 01:41 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-25 12:33 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 23:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 23:25 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-24 10:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-24 10:17 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-08-23 08:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-22 05:45 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-21 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 00:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 21:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 16:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 03:29 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-15 14:21 UTCEG score recompute
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-69249?
When was CVE-2026-69249 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-69249 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-69249?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-69249?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-69249
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-69249?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.