CVE-2026-5241

CRITICALNVD 9.69.6
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.6 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.6% (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory CVSS 8.0 is lower than this score; a lower GitHub score revises it only when its advisory is newer than the CVE record's last change, and this advisory (published 2026-06-03) is not newer than that change (2026-09-01), so it does not.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-34084 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2026-2290 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.6EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.6Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A vulnerability in the LightGlue model loading path of huggingface/transformers version 5.2.0 allows an attacker-controlled model repository to execute arbitrary code during model initialization. The issue arises because the trust_remote_code parameter, intended to prevent remote code execution, is overridden by untrusted serialized configuration data in a nested code path. Specifically, when loading a LightGlue model using AutoModel.from_pretrained() with trust_remote_code=False, the LightGlueConfig reads the trust_remote_code value from the untrusted config.json file and propagates it into nested AutoConfig.from_pretrained() calls. This results in the execution of attacker-provided Python modules, even when the victim explicitly disables remote code execution. The vulnerability poses a high risk for environments such as API inference servers, research notebooks, CI/CD pipelines, and model evaluation workers, potentially leading to credential theft, lateral movement, or persistence/backdoor deployment.

CVSS v3
9.6
EG Score
9.6CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
59
EG Risk 59/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity96% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.6 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
49th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.6): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.6 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.6 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

June 3, 2026

Last Modified

September 1, 2026

Advisory Details (9)

Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit.
GitHub commit

commit 676559d5022b (huggingface/transformers)

Fix landed in huggingface/transformers commit 676559d5022b — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/commit/676559d5022b74aaa0cee1cee0842b7f27c5320e
Web page

huntr - The world's first bug bounty platform for AI/ML

https://huntr.com/bounties/ceb3ce1a-4c45-497a-b25e-cb9a7685e619
Red Hat

2484384 – (CVE-2026-5241) CVE-2026-5241 python-transformers: python-transformers: Arbitrary code execution due to overridden trust_remote_code setting

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2484384
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-5241 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-5241
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:60520
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:42644
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:37275
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:34456

Patch Availability(17)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhoai/odh-ta-lmes-job-rhel9:17915535272026-10-21redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-ta-lmes-job-rhel9:17914703182026-10-19redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-cuda-rhel9:17900901312026-09-23redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-rocm-rhel9:17901096202026-09-23redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-cpu-rhel9:17900757932026-09-23redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-spyre-rhel9:17900761412026-09-23redhat
redhatrhaii/model-opt-cuda-rhel9:17900764982026-09-23redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-rocm-rhel9:17896811262026-09-21redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-spyre-rhel9:17896812012026-09-21redhat
redhatrhaii/model-opt-cuda-rhel9:17896811262026-09-21redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-cpu-rhel9:17896811282026-09-21redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-cuda-rhel9:17896811262026-09-21redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-training-rocm64-torch29-py312-rhel9:17866114352026-08-27redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-training-rocm62-torch25-py311-rhel9:17824758302026-07-21redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-trustyai-nemo-guardrails-server-rhel9:17824716062026-07-09redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-training-rocm64-torch28-py312-rhel9:17821321632026-07-01redhat
piptransformers @ 5.5.0 (fixes < 5.5.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
transformers0.1 ... 5.2.0 (212 versions)
  • every version up to 5.5.0: fixed in 5.5.0
  • every version through 5.2.0: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 23× in last 7d / 77× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 469 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 369 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 08:57 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 08:57 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-13 08:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  4. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 49th percentile
  5. 2026-11-12 10:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-12 10:48 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-12 10:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  8. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  9. 2026-11-11 12:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-11 12:39 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-11 12:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  12. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  13. 2026-11-10 14:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-10 14:29 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-10 14:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  16. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  17. 2026-11-09 16:19 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-09 16:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  19. 2026-11-08 18:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-08 18:08 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-08 18:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  22. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  23. 2026-11-07 19:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-07 19:58 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-11-07 19:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  2. 2026-11-06 21:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-06 21:49 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-06 21:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  5. 2026-11-06 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  6. 2026-11-06 11:25 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-11-05 23:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-05 23:40 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-05 23:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  10. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  11. 2026-11-05 01:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-05 01:31 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-05 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  14. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  15. 2026-11-04 03:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-04 03:22 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-04 03:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  18. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  19. 2026-11-03 05:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-11-03 05:12 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-11-03 05:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  22. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  23. 2026-11-02 07:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-02 07:03 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-11-02 07:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  26. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  27. 2026-11-01 08:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  28. 2026-11-01 08:54 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-11-01 08:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-fgcw-684q-jj6r · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.0
  30. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  31. 2026-10-31 10:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-31 10:44 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  34. 2026-10-30 12:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-30 12:36 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  37. 2026-10-29 14:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-29 14:24 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  40. 2026-10-28 16:16 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-27 18:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  42. 2026-10-27 18:07 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  44. 2026-10-26 19:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-26 19:58 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-26 16:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  47. 2026-10-25 19:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-25 19:43 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 48th percentile
  50. 2026-10-25 14:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-24 21:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  52. 2026-10-24 21:34 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  54. 2026-10-23 23:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-23 23:25 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  57. 2026-10-23 01:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-23 01:01 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-22 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  60. 2026-10-22 02:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-22 02:18 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  63. 2026-10-21 03:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-21 03:50 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  66. 2026-10-20 05:37 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-20 05:37 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  69. 2026-10-19 07:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-19 07:16 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  72. 2026-10-18 09:01 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-10-18 03:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  75. 2026-10-17 10:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-5241?
CVE-2026-5241 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on June 3, 2026. A vulnerability in the LightGlue model loading path of huggingface/transformers version 5.2.0 allows an attacker-controlled model repository to execute arbitrary code during model initialization. The issue arises because the trust_remote_code parameter, intended to prevent remote code execution, is…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-5241 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-5241 was published on June 3, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 1, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-5241 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-5241 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-5241?
CVE-2026-5241 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.6 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-5241?
A fix for CVE-2026-5241 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-5241 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-5241

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-5241?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.