CVE-2026-69112

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: MODERATE) published 2026-08-10. The CNA's CVSS baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-55743 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2026-3804 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

Hugging Face Accelerate through 1.14.0 contains a path traversal vulnerability in load_checkpoint_in_model and load_checkpoint_and_dispatch functions that fail to sanitize weight_map entries from sharded checkpoint indexes. Attackers can supply relative paths with ../ sequences or absolute paths to read arbitrary files, or point shard entries at named pipes to cause indefinite blocking and denial of service.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
48
EG Risk 48/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity71% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-07). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 10, 2026

Last Modified

November 8, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 10, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_pr.
Web page

Hugging Face Accelerate 1.14.0 Path Traversal and DoS via weight_map | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/hugging-face-accelerate-path-traversal-and-dos-via-weight-map
GitHub pull request

Reject sharded-checkpoint shard paths that escape the checkpoint folder

Upstream fix in progress (PR #4138 · huggingface/accelerate, state=open)

https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate/pull/4138
GitHub pull request

fix(modeling): reject sharded-checkpoint weight_map entries that escape the checkpoint folder (#4067)

Upstream fix in progress (PR #4070 · huggingface/accelerate, state=closed)

https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate/pull/4070
Web page

[Security] Path traversal + malicious-model DoS via sharded-checkpoint `weight_map` in …. · Issue #4067 · huggingface/accelerate · GitHub

https://github.com/huggingface/accelerate/issues/4067

Patch Availability(9)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhoai/odh-ta-lmes-job-rhel9:17915535272026-10-21redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-trustyai-cpu-py312-rhel9:17918163162026-10-21redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-workbench-jupyter-trustyai-cpu-py312-rhel9:17918295302026-10-19redhat
redhatrhaii/model-opt-cuda-rhel9:17918571102026-10-14redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-rocm-rhel9:17918567252026-10-14redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-spyre-rhel9:17918585922026-10-14redhat
redhatrhaii/vllm-spyre-rhel9:17918183572026-10-13redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-caikit-tgis-serving-rhel9:17870601002026-09-08redhat
pipaccelerate—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
accelerate0.0.1 ... 1.9.0 (82 versions)
  • every version through 1.14.0: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 41× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 296 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 196 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  4. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  6. 2026-11-08 14:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-08 14:17 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-08 14:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  9. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  10. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  11. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  12. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 23:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-03 23:09 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-03 23:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub severity MODERATE · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  16. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  17. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  18. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  19. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  20. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  21. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  22. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  23. 2026-10-27 21:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-27 21:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  25. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 14:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  4. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  5. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-24 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  7. 2026-10-23 19:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-10-23 19:31 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-23 19:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  10. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  11. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  12. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 10:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-20 10:56 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-20 10:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  17. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  19. 2026-10-18 03:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  21. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  22. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  23. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  24. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  25. 2026-10-13 09:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-13 09:55 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-13 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  28. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  29. 2026-10-12 15:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-11 19:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-11 16:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-11 14:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  34. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  35. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  36. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  37. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  38. 2026-10-06 18:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  39. 2026-10-06 18:20 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-06 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  41. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  42. 2026-10-05 18:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-05 18:21 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-05 18:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  45. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  46. 2026-10-05 02:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-05 02:35 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-05 02:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  49. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  50. 2026-10-04 12:24 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-04 12:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  52. 2026-10-03 22:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-03 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-03 22:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  55. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  56. 2026-10-02 22:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-02 22:34 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-02 22:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  59. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  60. 2026-10-02 09:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-02 09:17 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-02 09:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  63. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  64. 2026-10-01 11:12 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-01 11:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  66. 2026-09-30 22:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-09-30 22:25 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-30 22:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  69. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  70. 2026-09-29 05:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-09-29 05:21 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-29 05:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4j2p-28q2-5m79 · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  73. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  74. 2026-09-28 02:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-28 02:23 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-69112?
CVE-2026-69112 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 10, 2026. Hugging Face Accelerate through 1.14.0 contains a path traversal vulnerability in load_checkpoint_in_model and load_checkpoint_and_dispatch functions that fail to sanitize weight_map entries from sharded checkpoint indexes. Attackers can supply relative paths with ../ sequences or absolute paths to…
When was CVE-2026-69112 made public?
CVE-2026-69112 was made public on June 9, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on August 10, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 8, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-69112 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-69112 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-69112?
CVE-2026-69112 has a CVSS base score of 7.1 (the CNA's own assessment, by vulncheck; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-69112?
A fix for CVE-2026-69112 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-69112 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-69112

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-69112?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.