CVE-2026-68770

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-31. The CNA's CVSS baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-51650 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv (GitHub Security Advisories) · PYSEC-2026-4164 (OSV.dev)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.9%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

sentence-transformers contains a security control bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by exploiting a logic flaw in the import_module_class helper within sentence_transformers/util/misc.py, where the guard condition includes an 'or os.path.exists(model_name_or_path)' clause that satisfies the trust gate whenever the supplied path exists on the local filesystem, regardless of the trust_remote_code=False argument. Attackers who can control or influence the contents of a model directory on disk can place malicious Python files such as modeling_*.py referenced via modules.json, causing the code to execute at import time when an application loads the model with SentenceTransformer(path, trust_remote_code=False), bypassing the documented security contract and achieving code execution within the loading process.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
75
EG Risk 75/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.9%
EPSS %ILE
60th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.9% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 31, 2026

Last Modified

November 8, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Nov 8, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github_commit, github_pr.
Web page

sentence-transformers Arbitrary Code Execution on Local Model Load Despite trust_remote_code=False | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/sentence-transformers-arbitrary-code-execution-on-local-model-load-despite-trust-remote-code-false
GitHub commit

commit ae1acc3fb2aa (huggingface/sentence-transformers)

Fix landed in huggingface/sentence-transformers commit ae1acc3fb2aa — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/huggingface/sentence-transformers/commit/ae1acc3fb2aa2004577b297eb4a915ce7a03316a
Web page

GitHub - huggingface/sentence-transformers: State-of-the-Art Embeddings, Retrieval, and Reranking · GitHub

https://github.com/huggingface/sentence-transformers
GitHub pull request

[`deprecation`] Warn when loading local custom code without trust_remote_code

Fix merged in huggingface/sentence-transformers PR #3807 on 2026-06-12 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/huggingface/sentence-transformers/pull/3807
Web page

Remote Code Execution via trust_remote_code=False Bypass (Code Injection Vulnerability) · Issue #3801 · huggingface/sentence-transformers · GitHub

https://github.com/huggingface/sentence-transformers/issues/3801

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatrhoai/odh-caikit-nlp-rhel9:17914482122026-10-21redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-trustyai-nemo-guardrails-server-rhel9:17915561282026-10-19redhat
redhatrhoai/odh-trustyai-nemo-guardrails-server-rhel9:17895706742026-09-30redhat
pipsentence-transformers @ 5.6.0 (fixes < 5.6.0)—ghsa

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
sentence-transformers0.1.0 ... 5.5.1 (78 versions)
  • every version up to 5.6.0: fixed in 5.6.0
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 20× in last 7d / 72× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 529 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 429 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 19:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 19:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 18:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-11 18:01 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-11 18:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  9. 2026-11-10 16:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-10 16:46 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-10 16:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  13. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  14. 2026-11-09 15:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-09 15:30 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-09 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  18. 2026-11-08 14:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-08 14:16 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-08 14:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-11-08 03:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-08 03:26 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-08 03:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  25. 2026-11-07 02:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-07 02:11 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-11-07 02:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  4. 2026-11-06 15:55 UTCOSV refresh
  5. 2026-11-06 00:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-06 00:55 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-06 00:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  9. 2026-11-04 23:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-11-04 23:40 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-11-04 23:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  13. 2026-11-03 22:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-03 22:25 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-03 22:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 60th percentile
  17. 2026-11-02 21:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-02 21:08 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-11-02 21:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  21. 2026-11-01 19:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-11-01 19:53 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-11-01 19:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-jhr6-gm9c-rqjv · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  25. 2026-10-31 18:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-31 18:39 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  28. 2026-10-30 17:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-30 17:24 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  31. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  32. 2026-10-29 16:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-29 16:09 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  35. 2026-10-28 14:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-28 14:53 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  38. 2026-10-27 13:08 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-27 06:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-27 06:44 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  42. 2026-10-26 01:58 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-26 01:58 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  45. 2026-10-25 14:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-25 00:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-25 00:42 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  49. 2026-10-23 23:27 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-23 17:34 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-23 17:34 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  53. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  54. 2026-10-22 16:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-22 16:18 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  57. 2026-10-21 14:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  58. 2026-10-21 14:27 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  60. 2026-10-20 13:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-20 13:12 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  63. 2026-10-19 11:56 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-19 11:56 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  66. 2026-10-18 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-10-18 03:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  69. 2026-10-17 08:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-17 08:42 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  72. 2026-10-16 07:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-16 07:26 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.9% · 59th percentile
  75. 2026-10-15 06:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-68770?
CVE-2026-68770 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 31, 2026. sentence-transformers contains a security control bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution by exploiting a logic flaw in the import_module_class helper within sentence_transformers/util/misc.py, where the guard condition includes an 'or…
When was CVE-2026-68770 made public?
CVE-2026-68770 was made public on July 30, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on July 31, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 8, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-68770 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-68770 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.9% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (60th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-68770?
CVE-2026-68770 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (the CNA's own assessment, by vulncheck; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-68770?
A fix for CVE-2026-68770 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-68770 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-68770

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-68770?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.