CVE-2026-67231

CRITICALNVD 9.19.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.1 under NVD CVSS. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (13th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS

Also known asEUVD-2026-85664 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 9.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0, The trust-store plugin installs a verify_fun that overrides {bad_cert, unknown_ca} / {bad_cert, selfsigned_peer} when the presented cert "matches" a whitelisted one. The match key is extract_issuer_id/1 → public_key:pkix_issuer_id/2 → {IssuerName, SerialNumber} , both fields are taken verbatim from the presented certificate body and contain no public-key, SKI, fingerprint or signature material. is_whitelisted/1 is a pure ets:member lookup; the stored full DER is used only for list/0 display and is never compared against the presented cert. cacerts is [], so the whitelisted cert is never used as a trust anchor for path validation either. TLS client-authentication bypass: an attacker who knows the issuer DN + serial of any whitelisted certificate can connect with a forged self-signed cert. Preconditions include rabbitmq_trust_store plugin enabled and used as the TLS verify_fun Attacker knows or can guess the {Issuer, Serial} of at least one whitelisted cert (non-secret; exposed via CLI/logs/any cert copy). This issue is fixed in versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0.

CVSS
9.1
EG Score
9.1CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
56
EG Risk 56/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity91% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
13th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.1 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 23, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 23, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_release.
GitHub release Patch Available

RabbitMQ 4.3.0

Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.3.0

https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.3.0
GitHub release Patch Available

RabbitMQ 4.2.6

Patch available: rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server v4.2.6

https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/tag/v4.2.6
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Trust-store whitelist by Issuer+Serial only · Advisory · rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server · GitHub

https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/security/advisories/GHSA-cw8c-4m83-9c6w

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-67231(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubunturabbitmq-server (3.12.1-1ubuntu1.7) @ noble2026-11-12ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rabbitmq-server3.10.8-1.1 ... 4.3.6-1 (29 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rabbitmq-server4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.6-1 (19 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
rabbitmq-server4.0.5-10 ... 4.3.0-1 (9 versions)
  • every version up to 4.3.0-2: fixed in 4.3.0-2
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 57× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 191 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 91 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 15:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-11-12 15:39 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  5. 2026-11-11 13:24 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-11 13:24 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  8. 2026-11-10 11:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-09 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  10. 2026-11-09 08:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-09 08:54 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  13. 2026-11-08 06:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-08 06:40 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  16. 2026-11-07 04:25 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-11-07 04:25 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  19. 2026-11-06 15:25 UTCOSV refresh
  20. 2026-11-06 02:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-11-06 02:07 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  23. 2026-11-04 23:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-11-04 23:52 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-03 21:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-03 21:36 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  4. 2026-11-02 19:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-02 19:14 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  7. 2026-11-01 16:54 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-01 16:54 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  10. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  11. 2026-10-31 14:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-31 14:39 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  14. 2026-10-30 12:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-10-30 12:23 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  17. 2026-10-29 10:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-29 10:09 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  20. 2026-10-28 07:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-28 07:52 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  23. 2026-10-27 05:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 23:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  26. 2026-10-25 23:20 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  28. 2026-10-25 14:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-24 21:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-24 21:02 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  32. 2026-10-23 18:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-23 18:46 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  35. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  36. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-22 16:29 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  39. 2026-10-21 14:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  40. 2026-10-21 14:13 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  42. 2026-10-20 11:57 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-19 20:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-19 20:47 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  46. 2026-10-19 15:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  47. 2026-10-19 15:14 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  49. 2026-10-18 12:57 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-18 03:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  51. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  52. 2026-10-17 10:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-17 10:42 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  55. 2026-10-16 08:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  56. 2026-10-16 08:27 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  58. 2026-10-15 06:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  59. 2026-10-15 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 15th percentile
  61. 2026-10-14 01:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  62. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  63. 2026-10-12 22:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-10-12 22:00 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  66. 2026-10-12 15:45 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-10-12 01:33 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-11 21:05 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-11 19:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  70. 2026-10-11 16:50 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-10-11 16:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  72. 2026-10-11 14:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  74. 2026-10-11 12:36 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-11 12:36 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-67231?
CVE-2026-67231 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 23, 2026. RabbitMQ is a messaging and streaming broker. Prior to versions 3.13.15, 4.0.20, 4.1.11, 4.2.6, and 4.3.0, The trust-store plugin installs a verify_fun that overrides {bad_cert, unknown_ca} / {bad_cert, selfsigned_peer} when the presented cert "matches" a whitelisted one. The match key is…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-67231 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-67231 was published on September 23, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-67231 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-67231 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (13th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-67231?
CVE-2026-67231 has a CVSS base score of 9.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-67231?
A fix for CVE-2026-67231 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-67231 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-67231

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-67231?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.