CVE-2026-64474

MEDIUMNVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

This medium-severity CVE scores 5.5 under NVD CVSS v3. EPSS exploit probability: 0.2% (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from NVD CVSS v3
Sources: EPSS, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2026-48818 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

vfio: prevent infinite loop in vfio_mig_get_next_state() on blocked arc

vfio_mig_get_next_state() walks vfio_from_fsm_table[] one step at a time, looping to skip optional states the device does not support until *next_fsm is supported. A blocked transition is encoded as VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_ERROR, which the trailing return reports as -EINVAL.

The skip loop does not account for the ERROR sentinel. state_flags_table[ERROR] is ~0U and vfio_from_fsm_table[ERROR][*] is ERROR, so once *next_fsm becomes ERROR the loop condition stays true and *next_fsm never changes. The blocked arcs STOP_COPY -> PRE_COPY and STOP_COPY -> PRE_COPY_P2P map to ERROR yet pass the support check on a precopy-capable device, causing the loop to spin forever while holding the driver state mutex. This can result in a soft lockup, and a panic with softlockup_panic set.

Terminate the skip loop on the ERROR sentinel so a blocked transition falls through to the existing return and reports -EINVAL.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
7th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.NVD CVSS v3 · CVSS v3.0 or v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-11). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

November 12, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64474(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(18)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.12—
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.100-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (30 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.96-1: fixed in 6.12.96-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (162 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.4-1: fixed in 7.1.4-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(17)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 37× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 160 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 60 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scoredFirst assessed: 5.5 MEDIUM
  3. 2026-11-12 16:28 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-11-12 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  5. 2026-11-12 16:27 UTCNVD updateCVSS v3 → 5.5 · severity → MEDIUM
  6. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  7. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  8. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  9. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  10. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  11. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  12. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  13. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  14. 2026-11-03 18:31 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  15. 2026-11-03 18:31 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-11-03 18:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  17. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  19. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  20. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  21. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  22. 2026-10-29 17:38 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-29 17:38 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-29 17:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  25. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  2. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  3. 2026-10-27 03:25 UTCOSV refresh
  4. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  5. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 14:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  9. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  11. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  12. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  13. 2026-10-18 03:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  15. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  16. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  18. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  19. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-11 19:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  22. 2026-10-11 16:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  25. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  26. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  27. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  28. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  29. 2026-10-07 04:23 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-07 04:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  31. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  32. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  33. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  34. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  35. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  36. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  37. 2026-10-01 10:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-01 10:16 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-01 10:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  40. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  41. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  42. 2026-09-28 04:07 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-28 04:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  44. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  45. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  46. 2026-09-22 21:56 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-22 21:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  48. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  49. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  50. 2026-09-18 02:41 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-18 02:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  52. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  53. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  54. 2026-09-14 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-14 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  56. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  57. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  58. 2026-09-11 02:30 UTCVendor advisory
  59. 2026-09-11 02:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  60. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  61. 2026-09-07 21:12 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-07 21:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  63. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  64. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  65. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  66. 2026-09-04 12:38 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-04 12:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  68. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  69. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  70. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  71. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  72. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  73. 2026-08-30 03:01 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-30 03:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-67fj-9v49-3ch9
  75. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64474?
CVE-2026-64474 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vfio: prevent infinite loop in vfio_mig_get_next_state() on blocked arc vfio_mig_get_next_state() walks vfio_from_fsm_table[] one step at a time, looping to skip optional states the device does not support until *next_fsm is…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64474 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64474 was published on July 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 12, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64474 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64474 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64474?
CVE-2026-64474 has a CVSS v3 base score of 5.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64474?
A fix for CVE-2026-64474 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64474 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64474

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64474?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.