CVE-2026-64456

HIGHPre-NVD 7.77.7
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 7.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.2%, top 92% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.7EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.7Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data()

random_recv_done() stores the device-reported used.len directly into vi->data_avail. copy_data() then indexes vi->data[] using vi->data_idx (advanced by previous copy_data() calls) and issues a memcpy() without re-validating either value against the posted buffer size sizeof(vi->data) (SMP_CACHE_BYTES bytes, typically 32 or 64).

A malicious or buggy virtio-rng backend can set used.len beyond sizeof(vi->data), steering the memcpy() past the end of the inline array into adjacent kmalloc-1k slab bytes. hwrng_fillfn() mixes those bytes into the guest RNG, and guest root can also observe them directly via /dev/hwrng.

Concrete impact is inside the guest:

  • Memory-safety / hardening: any virtio-rng backend that
over-reports used.len causes the driver to read past vi->data into unrelated slab contents. hwrng_fillfn() is a kernel thread that runs as soon as the device is probed; no guest userspace interaction is required to first-trigger the OOB.
  • Cross-boundary leak (confidential-compute threat model): a
malicious hypervisor cooperating with a malicious or compromised guest root userspace can use /dev/hwrng as a leak channel for guest-kernel heap data. The host sets a large used.len, guest root reads /dev/hwrng, and the returned bytes contain guest kernel slab contents that were adjacent to vi->data. In practice, confidential-compute guests (SEV-SNP, TDX) usually disable virtio-rng entirely, so this path is narrow, but the fix is still worth carrying because the underlying memory-safety bug contaminates the guest RNG on any host.

KASAN confirms the OOB on a 7.1-rc4 guest whose virtio-rng backend has been patched to report used.len = 0x10000:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in virtio_read+0x394/0x5d0 Read of size 64 at addr ffff88800ae0ba20 by task hwrng/52 Call Trace: __asan_memcpy+0x23/0x60 virtio_read+0x394/0x5d0 hwrng_fillfn+0xb2/0x470 kthread+0x2cc/0x3a0 Allocated by task 1: probe_common+0xa5/0x660 virtio_dev_probe+0x549/0xbc0 The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88800ae0b800 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-1k of size 1024 The buggy address is located 0 bytes to the right of allocated 544-byte region [ffff88800ae0b800, ffff88800ae0ba20)

Same class of bug as commit c04db81cd028 ("net/9p: Fix buffer overflow in USB transport layer"), which hardened usb9pfs_rx_complete() against unchecked device-reported length in the USB 9p transport.

With the clamp at point of use and array_index_nospec() in place, the same harness boots cleanly: copy_data() returns zero for the bogus report, the device-supplied bytes after data_idx are discarded, and the driver issues a fresh request.

CVSS v3
7.7
EG Score
7.7(medium)
EG Risk
39(Track)
EG Risk 39/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity77% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
8%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

July 27, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 27, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/fde19b0d4eeabae042519313c843fe6f27d41e9d
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e3046eeada299f917a8ad883af4434bfb86556b1
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/92d5736a62040ec1cfff23ea57e6599301690ad5
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/81dd21b5f0c299cc7b5bf84f04a61938559d20e6
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/63335e7b638ae70028ae285bb95153874a8bc852
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3aa3e89cf80721c8d382b4c1a2b70a0449dad4a5
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2e788948ff2a13358a303af112497a63201c5739
generic

hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/285e17c44e3873a73460f294acbd64018ff64385

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64456(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 14× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-27 05:26 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-07-27 05:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-27 05:13 UTCEG score recompute 7.70
  4. 2026-07-27 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-27 05:12 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.7 · severity → HIGH
  6. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-07-26 02:47 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-07-26 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-07-25 10:39 UTCNVD update
  13. 2026-07-25 09:26 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-07-25 09:21 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64456?
CVE-2026-64456 is a high vulnerability published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hwrng: virtio: clamp device-reported used.len at copy_data() randomrecvdone() stores the device-reported used.len directly into vi->dataavail. copydata() then indexes vi->data[] using vi->dataidx (advanced by previous copydata()…
When was CVE-2026-64456 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64456 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 25, 2026, with the most recent update on July 27, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64456 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64456 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 91.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64456?
CVE-2026-64456 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.7 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64456?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64456, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-64456

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64456?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.