CVE-2026-64438

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-48782 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

crypto: qat - fix VF2PF work teardown race in adf_disable_sriov()

The VF2PF interrupt handler queues PF-side response work that stores a raw pointer to per-VF state (struct adf_accel_vf_info). Currently, adf_disable_sriov() destroys per-VF mutexes and frees vf_info without stopping new VF2PF work or waiting for in-flight workers to complete. A concurrently scheduled or already queued worker can then dereference freed memory.

This manifests as a use-after-free when KASAN is enabled:

BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in mutex_lock+0x76/0xe0 Write of size 8 at addr 0000000000000260 by task kworker/24:2/... Workqueue: qat_pf2vf_resp_wq adf_iov_send_resp [intel_qat] Call Trace: kasan_report+0x119/0x140 mutex_lock+0x76/0xe0 adf_gen4_pfvf_send+0xd4/0x1f0 [intel_qat] adf_recv_and_handle_vf2pf_msg+0x290/0x360 [intel_qat] adf_iov_send_resp+0x8c/0xe0 [intel_qat] process_one_work+0x6ac/0xfd0 worker_thread+0x4dd/0xd30 kthread+0x326/0x410 ret_from_fork+0x33b/0x670

Add a PF-local flag, vf2pf_disabled, that gates work queueing, worker processing, and interrupt re-enabling during teardown. Set this flag atomically with the hardware interrupt mask inside adf_disable_all_vf2pf_interrupts(). After masking, synchronize the AE cluster MSI-X interrupt and flush the PF response workqueue before tearing down per-VF locks and state so all in-flight work completes before vf_info is destroyed.

Introduce adf_enable_all_vf2pf_interrupts() to clear the flag and unmask all VF2PF interrupts under the same lock when SR-IOV is re-enabled. This ensures the software flag and hardware state transition atomically on both the enable and disable paths.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
3rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-06). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 27, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

crypto: qat - fix VF2PF work teardown race in adf_disable_sriov() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f344a369d0380d54c8d6c8d24734a78dd5a89817
Web page

crypto: qat - fix VF2PF work teardown race in adf_disable_sriov() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6e92b28cd74fa433658efeadf21b9d4b01023d7d
Web page

crypto: qat - fix VF2PF work teardown race in adf_disable_sriov() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d916c1eae1933511a69bffe243b4ee5d7da399c
Web page

crypto: qat - fix VF2PF work teardown race in adf_disable_sriov() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/51144032248cc4ea22917370565650670b8b4e9b
Web page

crypto: qat - fix VF2PF work teardown race in adf_disable_sriov() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/49cd5ac6de8de39a14ead609bb552d372d5602cd
Web page

crypto: qat - fix VF2PF work teardown race in adf_disable_sriov() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/446b4d77599cf1a168573f7fb32a4a6aa4f09219
Web page

crypto: qat - fix VF2PF work teardown race in adf_disable_sriov() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/277281c10c63791067d24d421f7c43a15faa9096
Web page

crypto: qat - fix VF2PF work teardown race in adf_disable_sriov() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/218c2836b3987f3fa1d9eac505462cded0821e4c

Patch Availability(25)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1018.18) @ resolute2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (5.15.0.1114.120~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1035.38) @ noble2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-7.0 (7.0.0-1013.13) @ resolute2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (7.0.0-1014.14~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1118.115) @ jammy2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-31.31) @ resolute2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2018.18) @ resolute2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.15.0-1080 (5.15.0-1080.84) @ jammy2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-147.147) @ noble2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1122.131) @ jammy2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (5.15.0.1118.128~20.04.1) @ focal2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1019.19) @ resolute2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1071.79) @ noble2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1018.18~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1013.13) @ resolute2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1011.11) @ resolute2026-10-31ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-5.15 (5.15.0.1112.112) @ jammy2026-10-31ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-55.108.1.el10_02026-10-05redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-427.150.1.el9_42026-09-16redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-570.141.1.el9_62026-09-16redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.44.1.el9_82026-09-04redhat
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.50.1.el10_22026-09-01redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.262-1: fixed in 5.10.262-1
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.180-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1: fixed in 6.1.180-1
—
linux-6.12—
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.100-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (31 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1: fixed in 6.12.100-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.4-1: fixed in 7.1.4-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(20)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 332 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 232 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  2. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  3. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  4. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  5. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  6. 2026-11-07 05:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  7. 2026-11-07 05:52 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-11-07 05:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  9. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  10. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  11. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  12. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  13. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  14. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-31 09:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-31 09:41 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-31 09:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  19. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-25 14:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-24 13:29 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  3. 2026-10-24 13:29 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-24 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  5. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-19 21:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  10. 2026-10-19 21:40 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-19 21:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  12. 2026-10-19 20:44 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-10-19 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-19 20:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  15. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-18 03:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  19. 2026-10-16 17:15 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  20. 2026-10-16 17:15 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-16 17:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  22. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-16 15:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  24. 2026-10-16 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-16 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  26. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  27. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  28. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  29. 2026-10-13 11:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-13 11:41 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-13 11:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  32. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-11 19:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-11 16:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  38. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  39. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  40. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  41. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  42. 2026-10-07 04:26 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  43. 2026-10-07 04:26 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-10-07 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  45. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  46. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  47. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  48. 2026-10-04 07:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  49. 2026-10-04 07:27 UTCVendor advisory
  50. 2026-10-04 07:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  51. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  52. 2026-10-02 18:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-10-02 18:33 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-02 18:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  55. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  56. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  57. 2026-10-01 16:06 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-01 16:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  59. 2026-10-01 04:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-10-01 04:01 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-10-01 04:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  62. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  63. 2026-09-29 08:01 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-09-29 08:01 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-09-29 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  66. 2026-09-28 04:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  67. 2026-09-28 04:09 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-28 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  69. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  70. 2026-09-25 07:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  71. 2026-09-25 07:40 UTCVendor advisory
  72. 2026-09-25 07:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  73. 2026-09-24 10:11 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-09-24 10:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-j99q-5p83-43j8 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  75. 2026-09-23 22:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64438?
CVE-2026-64438 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - fix VF2PF work teardown race in adf_disable_sriov() The VF2PF interrupt handler queues PF-side response work that stores a raw pointer to per-VF state (struct adf_accel_vf_info). Currently, adf_disable_sriov()…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64438 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64438 was published on July 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64438 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64438 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64438?
CVE-2026-64438 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64438?
A fix for CVE-2026-64438 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64438 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64438

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64438?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.