CVE-2026-64368

HIGHPre-NVD 8.18.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-25. a secondary CVSS source baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/slab: do not limit zeroing to orig_size when only red zoning is enabled

When init (zeroing) on allocation is requested, for kmalloc() we generally have to zero the full object size even if a smaller size is requested, in order to provide krealloc()'s __GFP_ZERO guarantees.

But if we track the requested size, krealloc() uses that information to do the right thing, so we can zero only the requested size. With red zoning also enabled, any extra size became part of the red zone, so it must not be zeroed and thus we must zero only the requested size.

However the current check is imprecise, and will trigger also when only SLAB_RED_ZONE is enabled without SLAB_STORE_USER (which enables tracking the requested size). This means enabling red zoning alone can compromise krealloc()'s __GFP_ZERO contract.

Fix this by using slub_debug_orig_size() instead, which is the exact check for whether the requested size is tracked. We don't need to care if red zoning is also enabled or not. Also update and expand the comment accordingly.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1(medium)
EG Risk
41(Track)
EG Risk 41/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity81% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
36%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 4, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Jul 27, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

mm/slab: do not limit zeroing to orig_size when only red zoning is enabled - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e706d50fa119eead6376bf0ef973e8d73a96030
generic

mm/slab: do not limit zeroing to orig_size when only red zoning is enabled - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/648927ceb84021a25a0fbd5673740956f318d534
generic

mm/slab: do not limit zeroing to orig_size when only red zoning is enabled - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6256899c3a34674bba6076884aedbba49fc695e4
generic

mm/slab: do not limit zeroing to orig_size when only red zoning is enabled - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2382971aaaef5bf85a651234c64906f59580b8be
generic

mm/slab: do not limit zeroing to orig_size when only red zoning is enabled - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0d18ccef142f04433dfb2a0c120cf223d2b8a42c

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (30 versions)6.12.96-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (158 versions)7.1.4-1

Additional Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 28× in last 7d / 124× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 253 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:47 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-18 19:47 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-18 19:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-18 02:47 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-18 02:47 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-18 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-17 01:55 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-17 01:55 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-17 01:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-16 06:31 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-16 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-16 06:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-15 09:24 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-15 09:24 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-15 09:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-14 10:15 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-14 10:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-13 21:32 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-13 21:32 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-13 21:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-13 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-13 06:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-12 17:40 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-12 17:40 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-12 17:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-12 05:00 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-12 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-11 16:24 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-11 16:24 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-11 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-11 02:16 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-11 02:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-10 13:20 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-10 13:20 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-10 13:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-09 08:36 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-09 08:36 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-09 08:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-07 21:16 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-07 21:16 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-07 21:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-06 10:21 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-06 10:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-05 21:52 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-05 21:52 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-05 21:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-09-05 09:23 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-09-05 09:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-04 20:54 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-04 20:54 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-09-04 20:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-09-04 12:41 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-04 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-04 12:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  40. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-09-01 23:13 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-01 23:13 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-01 23:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  46. 2026-08-31 01:13 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-08-31 01:13 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-31 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  50. 2026-08-30 12:44 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-30 12:44 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-08-30 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  53. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  54. 2026-08-30 00:08 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-30 00:08 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-08-30 00:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  58. 2026-08-27 22:26 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-27 22:26 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-08-27 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-08-27 09:57 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-08-27 09:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-26 19:50 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-08-26 19:50 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-08-26 19:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  67. 2026-08-26 06:51 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-08-26 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-25 17:43 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-25 17:43 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-08-25 17:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  73. 2026-08-25 04:26 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-08-25 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-08-24 15:58 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64368?
CVE-2026-64368 is a high vulnerability published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/slab: do not limit zeroing to orig_size when only red zoning is enabled When init (zeroing) on allocation is requested, for kmalloc() we generally have to zero the full object size even if a smaller size is requested, in order…
When was CVE-2026-64368 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64368 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 25, 2026, with the most recent update on September 4, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64368 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64368 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 64.3% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64368?
CVE-2026-64368 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64368?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64368, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64368

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64368?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.