CVE-2026-64352

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-25. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3

Also known asEUVD-2026-48896 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs

trie_lookup_elem() annotates its rcu_dereference_check() walks with only rcu_read_lock_bh_held(). Because rcu_dereference_check(p, c) resolves to "c || rcu_read_lock_held()", this passes for XDP/NAPI and classic RCU readers but fails for sleepable BPF programs, which enter via __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable() and hold only rcu_read_lock_trace().

trie_update_elem() and trie_delete_elem() have the same problem in a different form: they walk the trie with plain rcu_dereference(), which asserts rcu_read_lock_held() unconditionally. Both are reachable from sleepable BPF programs via the bpf_map_update_elem / bpf_map_delete_elem helpers, and from the syscall path under classic rcu_read_lock(). In the writer paths the trie is actually protected by trie->lock (an rqspinlock taken across the walk); we never relied on the RCU read-side lock to keep nodes alive there.

A sleepable LSM hook that ends up touching an LPM trie therefore triggers lockdep on debug kernels:

============================= WARNING: suspicious RCU usage 7.1.0-... Tainted: G E ----------------------------- kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c:249 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage! 1 lock held by net_tests/540: #0: (rcu_tasks_trace_srcu_struct){....}-{0:0}, at: __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable+0x26/0x280 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl lockdep_rcu_suspicious trie_lookup_elem bpf_prog_..._enforce_security_socket_connect bpf_trampoline_... security_socket_connect __sys_connect do_syscall_64

This is lockdep-only -- no UAF, since Tasks Trace RCU does serialize against the trie's reclaim path -- but it spams the console once per distinct callsite on every debug kernel running a sleepable BPF LSM that touches an LPM trie, which is increasingly common.

For the lookup path, switch the rcu_dereference_check() annotation from rcu_read_lock_bh_held() to bpf_rcu_lock_held(), which accepts all three contexts (classic, BH, Tasks Trace). Other map types already follow this convention.

For trie_update_elem() and trie_delete_elem(), annotate the walks as rcu_dereference_protected(*p, 1) -- matching trie_free() in the same file -- since trie->lock is held across the walk. rqspinlock has no lockdep_map, so the predicate degenerates to '1' rather than lockdep_is_held(&trie->lock); the protection is real but not machine-verifiable. trie_get_next_key() also uses bare rcu_dereference() but is reachable only from the BPF syscall, which holds classic rcu_read_lock() before dispatching, so it is left untouched.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

November 6, 2026

Advisory Details (7)

Auto-updated Sep 3, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f0967d4f1ba4323a3cb7dc8fdba74dd3a8caaf04
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec662a8b2cde01e76b37ccd4b992d0342299e69c
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bd6ad9a6b30498d845413e863fb95c6fab3babe3
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9bfdf4b81b0e56d47bc6c46c34a46638be716695
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/57454944737f3ad9a8703aecbbb79713b513a94b
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/304ca50582f0c047370f85e13caec456f78c9fcc
Web page

bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2f884d371fafea137afea504d49ee4a7c8d7985b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64352(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(19)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-5.15 (5.15.0.1112.112) @ jammy2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1071.79) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-7.0 (7.0.0-1013.13) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2018.18) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1011.11) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (5.15.0.1114.120~20.04.1) @ focal2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1122.131) @ jammy2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1018.18~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-147.147) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1018.18) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-31.31) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (5.15.0.1118.128~20.04.1) @ focal2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1118.115) @ jammy2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.15.0-1080 (5.15.0-1080.84) @ jammy2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1019.19) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (7.0.0-1014.14~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1013.13) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1: fixed in 6.1.180-1
—
linux-6.12—
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.100-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:11(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.180-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.180-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (31 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.100-1: fixed in 6.12.100-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (162 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.4-1: fixed in 7.1.4-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(19)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 236 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 136 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 04:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 04:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  3. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  4. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  5. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  6. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  7. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  8. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  9. 2026-11-06 17:27 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-06 17:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  11. 2026-11-06 16:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-11-06 16:53 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-11-06 16:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  14. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  15. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  16. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  17. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  18. 2026-11-03 05:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-03 05:46 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-11-03 05:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  21. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  22. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-27 18:46 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-10-27 18:46 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-27 18:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  4. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-25 14:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 09:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-10-20 09:14 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-20 09:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  16. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  17. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-18 03:22 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-13 11:43 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-13 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-13 11:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  27. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  28. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-11 19:32 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  30. 2026-10-11 16:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  31. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  32. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  33. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  34. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  35. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  36. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  37. 2026-10-07 06:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  38. 2026-10-07 06:12 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-10-07 06:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  40. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  41. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  42. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  43. 2026-10-04 07:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  44. 2026-10-04 07:33 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-10-04 07:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  46. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  47. 2026-10-02 19:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-02 19:28 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-02 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  50. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  51. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  52. 2026-10-01 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-10-01 15:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  54. 2026-10-01 04:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  55. 2026-10-01 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-10-01 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  57. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  58. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  59. 2026-09-28 04:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  60. 2026-09-28 04:16 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-28 04:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  62. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  63. 2026-09-25 09:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  64. 2026-09-25 09:48 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-09-25 09:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  66. 2026-09-24 09:01 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-24 09:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  68. 2026-09-23 22:10 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-09-23 22:10 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-23 22:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  71. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  72. 2026-09-23 09:02 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-23 09:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-p2wc-grc5-cwhm · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  74. 2026-09-22 22:04 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-09-22 22:04 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64352?
CVE-2026-64352 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Allow LPM map access from sleepable BPF programs trie_lookup_elem() annotates its rcu_dereference_check() walks with only rcu_read_lock_bh_held(). Because rcu_dereference_check(p, c) resolves to "c || rcu_read_lock_held()",…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64352 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64352 was published on July 25, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of November 6, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64352 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64352 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64352?
CVE-2026-64352 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64352?
A fix for CVE-2026-64352 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64352 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64352

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64352?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.