CVE-2026-64273

HIGHNVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-25. NVD baseline CVSS 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, nvd
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index

iforce_process_packet() handles a status report (packet id 0x02) by taking a force-feedback effect index straight from the device wire and using it to address the per-effect state array:

i = data[1] & 0x7f; if (data[1] & 0x80) { if (!test_and_set_bit(FF_CORE_IS_PLAYED, iforce->core_effects[i].flags)) ... } else if (test_and_clear_bit(FF_CORE_IS_PLAYED, iforce->core_effects[i].flags)) { ... }

The index is masked only with 0x7f, so it ranges 0..127, but core_effects[] holds only IFORCE_EFFECTS_MAX (32) entries. For an index of 32..127 the test_and_set_bit()/test_and_clear_bit() is an out-of-bounds single-bit read-modify-write past the array. core_effects[] is the second-to-last member of struct iforce, so the write lands in the trailing members and beyond the embedding kzalloc()'d iforce_serio / iforce_usb object.

data[1] is unvalidated device payload on both transports (the USB interrupt endpoint and serio), and the status path is not gated on force feedback being present, so a malicious or counterfeit device can set or clear a bit at an attacker-chosen offset past the object.

Reject an out-of-range index instead of indexing with it. Bound against the array dimension IFORCE_EFFECTS_MAX rather than dev->ff->max_effects so the check guarantees memory safety regardless of how many effects the device registered. A legitimate "effect started/stopped" status always carries an index below IFORCE_EFFECTS_MAX, so well-formed devices are unaffected; the neighbouring mark_core_as_ready() loop is already bounded and is left untouched.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
7%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 25, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Aug 13, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e5fa31f0550b55d80045669ae9080dd5b88abffa
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d10b0507fa0f5b46764b178e3271f9012f2df677
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c21295616a8a52b9a5f18cd4ca8c73030eda3d4f
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b1b79e89bc33e4c682d3df7ae2aadc62b5a0c310
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a40250f97c312e000e3616c9074022311a0efbc3
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/70019779325f2bb5f5a4098e91e79c655f50fcef
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6c0f2901c9d325d4a0574c4237fd507810d225ff
generic

Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0e9943d2e4c63496b6ca84bc66fd3c71d40558e2

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64273(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(6 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)5.10.262-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)6.1.180-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)6.1.180-1
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (30 versions)6.12.96-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (158 versions)7.1.4-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 96× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 160 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 22:27 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-18 22:27 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-18 22:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-18 02:53 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-18 02:53 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-18 02:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-17 01:57 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-17 01:57 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-17 01:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-16 06:38 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-16 06:38 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-16 06:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-15 09:32 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-15 09:32 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-15 09:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-14 05:44 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-14 05:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-13 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-13 17:34 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-09-13 17:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-09-13 05:23 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-13 05:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-12 17:12 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-12 17:12 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-12 17:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-12 05:02 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-12 05:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-11 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-09-11 16:33 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-09-11 16:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-11 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-11 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-10 13:31 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-10 13:31 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-09-10 13:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-09-09 08:40 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-09 08:40 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-09-09 08:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-09-07 21:22 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-07 21:22 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-07 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-06 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-05 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-05 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  29. 2026-09-05 06:51 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-05 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  31. 2026-09-04 12:42 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-04 12:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-09-01 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-01 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  38. 2026-08-31 00:40 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-08-31 00:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  40. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  41. 2026-08-30 12:30 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-08-30 12:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  44. 2026-08-30 00:12 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-08-30 00:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-27 23:09 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-08-27 23:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-27 10:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-26 22:49 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-08-26 22:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-08-26 10:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-25 22:21 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-08-25 22:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  57. 2026-08-25 10:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-08-24 22:01 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-08-24 22:01 UTCGHSA enrichment
  60. 2026-08-24 09:52 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-08-24 09:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-23 21:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-08-23 09:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-08-22 21:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-22 09:05 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-08-22 09:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  68. 2026-08-21 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-08-21 08:45 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-08-21 08:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-08-20 20:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-08-20 08:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-19 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-19 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64273?
CVE-2026-64273 is a high vulnerability published on July 25, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: iforce - bound the device-reported force-feedback effect index iforceprocesspacket() handles a status report (packet id 0x02) by taking a force-feedback effect index straight from the device wire and using it to address the…
When was CVE-2026-64273 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64273 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 25, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64273 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64273 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 93.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64273?
CVE-2026-64273 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64273?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64273, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64273

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64273?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.