CVE-2026-64150

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-45835 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: nft_inner: release local_lock before re-enabling softirqs

Quoting sashiko: In the error path, local_bh_enable() is called before local_unlock_nested_bh().

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
44
EG Risk 44/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
51st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.6% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-12). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 31, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

netfilter: nft_inner: release local_lock before re-enabling softirqs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/df19b6af171695a1352314597c9a4311d48d5171
Web page

netfilter: nft_inner: release local_lock before re-enabling softirqs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a6cb3ff979855f7f0ee9450a947fe8f96c2ba37a
Web page

netfilter: nft_inner: release local_lock before re-enabling softirqs - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6fecd39c6401134b58505bc4eb1adc8a0e2fe992

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64150(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(9)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (142 versions)
  • every version up to 7.0.12-1: fixed in 7.0.12-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(8)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 76× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 727 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 627 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 08:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-13 08:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  4. 2026-11-12 09:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-12 09:39 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-11-12 09:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  8. 2026-11-11 10:53 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  9. 2026-11-11 10:53 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-11-11 10:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  12. 2026-11-10 12:06 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  13. 2026-11-10 12:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  15. 2026-11-09 13:19 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-09 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  18. 2026-11-08 14:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-11-08 14:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  21. 2026-11-07 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-11-06 17:00 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-11-06 17:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  25. 2026-11-06 14:55 UTCOSV refresh
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-11-05 18:14 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  2. 2026-11-05 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  4. 2026-11-04 19:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  5. 2026-11-04 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  7. 2026-11-03 20:41 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  8. 2026-11-03 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  9. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  10. 2026-11-02 21:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  11. 2026-11-02 21:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  13. 2026-11-01 23:08 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  14. 2026-11-01 23:08 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-11-01 23:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  16. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  17. 2026-11-01 00:21 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  18. 2026-11-01 00:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  20. 2026-10-31 01:35 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  21. 2026-10-31 01:35 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-31 01:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  23. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  24. 2026-10-30 02:49 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-30 02:49 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-30 02:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 51st percentile
  28. 2026-10-29 04:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-29 04:03 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-29 04:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  32. 2026-10-28 05:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-28 05:17 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-28 05:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  36. 2026-10-27 06:30 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  37. 2026-10-27 06:30 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-10-27 06:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  40. 2026-10-26 03:50 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  41. 2026-10-26 03:50 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-10-26 03:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  43. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  44. 2026-10-25 14:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  45. 2026-10-25 05:03 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  46. 2026-10-25 05:03 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-10-25 05:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  48. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  49. 2026-10-24 06:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  50. 2026-10-24 06:17 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-24 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  53. 2026-10-23 07:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  54. 2026-10-23 07:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  56. 2026-10-22 08:39 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-10-22 08:39 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-10-22 08:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  60. 2026-10-21 09:52 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-10-21 09:52 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-21 09:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  63. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  64. 2026-10-20 11:05 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  65. 2026-10-20 11:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  66. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  67. 2026-10-19 12:17 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  68. 2026-10-19 12:17 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-10-19 12:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  71. 2026-10-18 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  72. 2026-10-18 03:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  73. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.6% · 50th percentile
  74. 2026-10-17 11:40 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  75. 2026-10-17 11:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-q478-9hmx-8q5r · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64150?
CVE-2026-64150 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nft_inner: release local_lock before re-enabling softirqs Quoting sashiko: In the error path, local_bh_enable() is called before local_unlock_nested_bh().
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-64150 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-64150 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-64150 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64150 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (51st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64150?
CVE-2026-64150 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64150?
A fix for CVE-2026-64150 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-64150 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64150

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64150?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.