CVE-2026-64057

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

afs: Fix the locking used by afs_get_link()

The afs filesystem in the kernel doesn't do locking correctly for symbolic links. There are a number of problems:

(1) It doesn't do any locking around afs_read_single() to prevent races between multiple ->get_link() calls, thereby allowing the possibility of leaks.

(2) It doesn't use RCU barriering when accessing the buffer pointers during RCU pathwalk.

(3) It can race with another thread updating the contents of the symlink if a third party updated it on the server.

Fix this by the following means:

(0) Move symlink handling into its own file as this makes it more complicated.

(1) Take the validate_lock around afs_read_single() to prevent races between multiple ->get_link() calls.

(2) Keep a separate copy of the symlink contents with an rcu_head. This is always going to be a lot smaller than a page, so it can be kmalloc'd and save quite a bit of memory. It also needs a refcount for non-RCU pathwalk.

(3) Split the symlink read and write-to-cache routines in afs from those for directories.

(4) Discard the I/O buffer as soon as the write-to-cache completes as this is a full page (plus a folio_queue).

(5) If there's no cache, discard the I/O buffer immediately after reading and copying if there is no cache.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(medium)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
1%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

September 2, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

afs: Fix the locking used by afs_get_link() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c0410adf3da6db46f3513411fcf95e63c2f1d1ad
generic

afs: Fix the locking used by afs_get_link() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/77ea917cbed62882a33114b1e23ededb977e4287

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-64057(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(6)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.0.9-1~bpo13+1 (141 versions)7.0.12-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 96× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 252 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 04:15 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-18 04:15 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-18 04:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-17 05:27 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-09-17 05:27 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-09-17 05:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-16 12:57 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-16 12:57 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-16 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-14 05:08 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-09-14 05:08 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-14 05:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-13 16:16 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-13 16:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-13 03:24 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-13 03:24 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-13 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-12 10:05 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-12 10:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-11 18:45 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-11 18:45 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-11 18:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-09-07 23:17 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-09-07 23:17 UTCVendor advisory
  5. 2026-09-07 23:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-09-06 12:51 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-09-06 12:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-05 22:48 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-05 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-05 22:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-05 09:55 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-05 09:55 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-05 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-02 21:21 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-02 21:21 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-09-02 21:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-31 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-08-31 04:35 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-08-31 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  28. 2026-08-30 15:43 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-30 15:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-08-30 02:51 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-30 02:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  34. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  35. 2026-08-28 04:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-27 15:14 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-08-27 15:14 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-27 15:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-27 01:37 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-08-27 01:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-08-26 12:44 UTCVendor advisory
  42. 2026-08-26 12:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  43. 2026-08-25 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-08-25 23:44 UTCVendor advisory
  45. 2026-08-25 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  46. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  47. 2026-08-25 10:49 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-08-25 10:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-08-24 21:57 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-08-24 21:57 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-24 21:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-24 09:05 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-24 09:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-23 20:04 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-23 20:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-23 07:12 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-23 07:12 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-23 07:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-23 00:19 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-08-22 18:20 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-22 18:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-22 05:28 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-22 05:28 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-22 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-08-21 16:36 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-21 16:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-21 03:27 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-21 03:27 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-21 03:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-08-20 14:35 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-20 14:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-20 01:05 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-20 01:05 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-64057?
CVE-2026-64057 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: afs: Fix the locking used by afsgetlink() The afs filesystem in the kernel doesn't do locking correctly for symbolic links. There are a number of problems: (1) It doesn't do any locking around afsreadsingle() to prevent races…
When was CVE-2026-64057 disclosed?
CVE-2026-64057 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on September 2, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-64057 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-64057 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 99.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-64057?
CVE-2026-64057 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-64057?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-64057, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-64057

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-64057?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.