CVE-2026-63979

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-07-19. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/handshake: hand off the pinned file reference to accept_doit

handshake_req_next() removes the request from the per-net pending list and drops hn_lock before handshake_nl_accept_doit() reads req->hr_sk->sk_socket and dereferences sock->file (once in FD_PREPARE() and again in get_file()). In that window a consumer running tls_handshake_cancel() followed by sockfd_put() (svc_sock_free) or __fput_sync() (xs_reset_transport) releases sock->file. sock_release() then runs sock_orphan(), zeroing sk_socket, and frees the struct socket. The accept-side code either reads NULL through sk_socket or chases freed memory.

The submit-side sock_hold() does not prevent this. sk_refcnt protects struct sock, but struct socket and sock->file are independently refcounted via the file descriptor the consumer owns. Pinning sk leaves sock and sock->file unprotected.

Retarget the accept-side dereferences at req->hr_file, which was pinned at submit time, instead of req->hr_sk->sk_socket->file. Pinning on its own is not sufficient: a consumer that cancels between handshake_req_next() returning and accept_doit reaching FD_PREPARE() takes the !remove_pending() branch in handshake_req_cancel() and drops hr_file before the accept side takes its own reference. Hand off an additional file reference inside handshake_req_next(), under hn_lock, so the accept side operates on a reference that no concurrent handshake_req_cancel() can revoke. FD_PREPARE() consumes that handed-off reference, either by transferring it to the new fd in fd_publish() or by dropping it in the cleanup destructor on error; the explicit get_file() that previously balanced FD_PREPARE() is therefore redundant and goes away.

Update handshake_req_cancel_test2 and _test3 to simulate the FD_PREPARE() consumption with an fput() so the kunit file-count assertions stay balanced.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(high)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
41%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

July 20, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Jul 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net/handshake: hand off the pinned file reference to accept_doit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f4251190e58b209999c1ba9e6d2976136a1be055
generic

net/handshake: hand off the pinned file reference to accept_doit - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c06876d4fac38f35820946ee3b1be7d7da799cd4

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63979(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(2)

Vendor / EcosystemFixed in / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1008.8) @ resolute2026-07-26ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-fde-7.0 (7.0.0-1009.9) @ resolute2026-07-26ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

All Vendor Advisories

(2)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 30× in last 7d / 33× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-07-27 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-07-27 03:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-07-26 23:15 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-07-26 23:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-26 19:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-07-26 15:05 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-07-26 15:05 UTCVendor advisory
  8. 2026-07-26 15:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-07-26 14:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-07-26 10:58 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-07-26 10:58 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-07-26 10:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-07-25 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-07-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-07-23 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-07-23 03:22 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-07-22 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-07-21 15:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-07-20 17:30 UTCEG score recompute
Show 8 more
  1. 2026-07-20 17:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-07-20 17:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-07-20 14:38 UTCEG score recompute 9.80
  4. 2026-07-20 14:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-07-20 14:32 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.8 · severity → CRITICAL
  6. 2026-07-19 17:49 UTCNVD update
  7. 2026-07-19 15:21 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-07-19 15:19 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63979?
CVE-2026-63979 is a critical vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/handshake: hand off the pinned file reference to accept_doit handshakereqnext() removes the request from the per-net pending list and drops hnlock before handshakenlacceptdoit() reads req->hrsk->sksocket and dereferences…
When was CVE-2026-63979 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63979 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on July 20, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63979 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63979 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 59.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63979?
CVE-2026-63979 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63979?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63979, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-63979

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63979?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.