CVE-2026-63806

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd datamatch with get_unaligned()

Drop a BUG_ON() that has been reachable since it was first added, way back in 2009, and instead use get_unaligned() to perform potentially-unaligned accesses.

For a given store, KVM x86's emulator tracks the entire value in the destination operand, x86_emulate_ctxt.dst. If the destination is memory, and the target splits multiple pages and/or is emulated MMIO, then KVM handles each fragment independently. E.g. on a page split starting at page offset 0xffc, KVM writes 4 bytes to the first page, then the remaining bytes to the second page, using ctxt->dst as the source for both (with appropriate offsets).

If the destination splits a page *and* hits emulated MMIO on the second page, then KVM will complete the write to the first page, then emulate the MMIO access to the second page. If there is a datamatch-enabled ioeventfd at offset 0 of the second page, then KVM will process the remainder of the store as a potential ioeventfd signal.

Putting it all together, if the guest emits a store that splits a page starting at page offset N, and the second page has a datamatch-enabled ioeventfd at offset 0, then KVM will check for datamatch using &dst.valptr[N] as the source. Due to dst (and thus dst.valptr) being 32-byte aligned, if N is not aligned to @len, the BUG_ON() fires.

E.g. with a 16-byte store at page offset 0xffc, to an ioeventfd of len 8, all initial checks in ioeventfd_in_range() will succeed, and the BUG_ON() fires due to @val being 4-byte aligned, but not 8-byte aligned.

------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c:783! Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 615 Comm: repro Not tainted 7.1.0-rc2-ff238429d1ea #365 PREEMPT Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:ioeventfd_write+0x6c/0x70 [kvm] Call Trace: __kvm_io_bus_write+0x85/0xb0 [kvm] kvm_io_bus_write+0x53/0x80 [kvm] vcpu_mmio_write+0x66/0xf0 [kvm] emulator_read_write_onepage+0x12a/0x540 [kvm] emulator_read_write+0x109/0x2b0 [kvm] x86_emulate_insn+0x4f8/0xfb0 [kvm] x86_emulate_instruction+0x181/0x790 [kvm] kvm_mmu_page_fault+0x313/0x630 [kvm] vmx_handle_exit+0x18a/0x590 [kvm_intel] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0xc81/0x1c90 [kvm] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x2d5/0x970 [kvm] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8a/0xd0 do_syscall_64+0xb7/0x890 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 RIP: 0033:0x7f19c931a9bf Modules linked in: kvm_intel kvm irqbypass ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

In a perfect world, the fix would be to simply delete the BUG_ON(), as KVM x86 doesn't perform alignment checks on "normal" memory accesses at CPL0. Sadly, C99 ruins all the fun; while the x86 architecture plays nice, dereferencing an unaligned pointer directly is undefined behavior in C, e.g. triggers splats when running with CONFIG_UBSAN_ALIGNMENT=y.

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1(medium)
EG Risk
37(Track)
EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity71% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
5%
KEV
Not listed

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Jul 21, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd datamatch with get_unaligned() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f1edbed787ba67988ed34e0132ca128b052b6ce8
generic

KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd datamatch with get_unaligned() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bf89e3738480d33cd515b4a18900e8443d40cd2e
generic

KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd datamatch with get_unaligned() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5da9b1a87ec7cc3489c27016313524769f12d9e0
generic

KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUG_ON() in ioeventfd datamatch with get_unaligned() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5c87b47374682f69686068ad0a7779365a527b1c

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-63806(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(4)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)5.10.262-1
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.177-1~deb11u1 (22 versions)6.1.180-1~deb11u1
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (55 versions)6.1.180-1
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (29 versions)6.12.95-1
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (156 versions)7.1.3-1

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(4)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 86× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 220 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-18 04:27 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-18 04:27 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-09-18 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-17 10:06 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-17 10:06 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-17 10:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-14 04:50 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-14 04:50 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-09-14 04:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-13 16:23 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-09-13 16:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-13 03:56 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-13 03:56 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-09-13 03:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-12 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-12 10:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-11 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-11 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-11 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-11 09:37 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-09-07 23:45 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-07 23:45 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-09-07 23:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-09-07 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-06 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-06 13:16 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-09-06 13:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-05 20:16 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-05 20:16 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-09-05 20:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-01 04:40 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-31 04:26 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-31 04:26 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-08-31 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-30 19:17 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-30 15:43 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-08-30 15:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-30 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-30 03:03 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-08-30 03:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  26. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  27. 2026-08-28 01:45 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-08-28 01:45 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-08-28 01:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  31. 2026-08-27 11:58 UTCVendor advisory
  32. 2026-08-27 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  33. 2026-08-26 22:29 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-08-26 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  35. 2026-08-26 22:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  36. 2026-08-26 14:46 UTCEPSS rescore
  37. 2026-08-26 09:00 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-08-26 09:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-08-25 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-08-25 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
  41. 2026-08-25 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
  42. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-08-25 07:38 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-08-25 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-08-24 19:11 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-08-24 19:11 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-08-24 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  48. 2026-08-24 03:44 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-08-24 03:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-08-23 14:29 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-08-23 14:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-08-23 02:02 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-08-23 02:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-08-22 13:36 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-08-22 13:36 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-08-22 01:08 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-08-22 01:08 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-08-22 01:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-08-21 23:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  60. 2026-08-21 12:41 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-08-21 12:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-08-21 00:11 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-08-21 00:11 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-08-21 00:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-08-20 22:55 UTCEPSS rescore
  66. 2026-08-20 11:43 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-08-20 11:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-08-19 23:15 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-08-19 23:15 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-08-19 23:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  72. 2026-08-19 10:47 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-08-19 10:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-08-18 22:16 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-08-18 22:16 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63806?
CVE-2026-63806 is a high vulnerability published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: Replace guest-triggerable BUGON() in ioeventfd datamatch with getunaligned() Drop a BUG_ON() that has been reachable since it was first added, way back in 2009, and instead use get_unaligned() to perform potentially-unaligned…
When was CVE-2026-63806 disclosed?
CVE-2026-63806 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on July 19, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-63806 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63806 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 94.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63806?
CVE-2026-63806 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63806?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-63806, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63806

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63806?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.