CVE-2026-63801

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-07-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source

Also known asEUVD-2026-45467 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tipc: fix slab-use-after-free Read in tipc_aead_decrypt_done

tipc_aead_decrypt() goes straight from tipc_bearer_hold(b) to crypto_aead_decrypt(req) without taking a reference on the netns, unlike the encrypt path. When crypto_aead_decrypt() is offloaded asynchronously (e.g. the SIMD aead wrapper queuing to cryptd), the cryptd worker runs tipc_aead_decrypt_done() later. If the bearer's netns is torn down in the meantime, cleanup_net() -> tipc_exit_net() -> tipc_crypto_stop() frees the per-netns tipc_crypto, and the completion then reads it: tipc_aead_decrypt_done() dereferences aead->crypto->stats and aead->crypto->net, and tipc_crypto_rcv_complete() dereferences aead->crypto->aead[] and the node table -- reading freed memory.

Decoded KASAN splat (v7.1-rc7, CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE + TIPC + TIPC_CRYPTO):

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tipc_aead_decrypt_done (net/tipc/crypto.c:999) Read of size 8 at addr ffff8881056258a8 by task kworker/u16:2/51 Workqueue: events_unbound Call Trace: tipc_aead_decrypt_done (net/tipc/crypto.c:999) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3314) worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3397 kernel/workqueue.c:3478) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:436) ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:158) ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:245)

Allocated by task 169: __kasan_kmalloc (mm/kasan/common.c:398 mm/kasan/common.c:415) tipc_crypto_start (net/tipc/crypto.c:1502) tipc_init_net (net/tipc/core.c:72) ops_init (net/core/net_namespace.c:137) setup_net (net/core/net_namespace.c:446) copy_net_ns (net/core/net_namespace.c:579) create_new_namespaces (kernel/nsproxy.c:132) __x64_sys_unshare (kernel/fork.c:3316) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)

Freed by task 8: kfree (mm/slub.c:6566) tipc_exit_net (net/tipc/core.c:119) cleanup_net (net/core/net_namespace.c:704) process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3314) kthread (kernel/kthread.c:436)

This is the same class of bug that commit e279024617134 ("net/tipc: fix slab-use-after-free Read in tipc_aead_encrypt_done") fixed for the encrypt side. The encrypt path takes maybe_get_net(aead->crypto->net) before crypto_aead_encrypt() and drops it with put_net() on the synchronous return paths and in tipc_aead_encrypt_done(); the -EINPROGRESS/-EBUSY return keeps the reference for the async callback to release. The decrypt path was left without the equivalent guard.

Mirror the encrypt-side fix on the decrypt path: take a net reference before crypto_aead_decrypt() (failing with -ENODEV and the matching bearer put if it cannot be acquired), keep it across the -EINPROGRESS/-EBUSY async return, and drop it with put_net() on the synchronous success/error return and at the end of tipc_aead_decrypt_done().

Reproduced under KASAN on v7.1-rc7: a UDP bearer with a cluster key is flooded with crafted encrypted frames from an unknown peer (driving the cluster-key decrypt path) while the bearer's netns is repeatedly torn down. The completion must run asynchronously to outlive tipc_crypto_stop(); on x86 the stock aesni gcm(aes) now decrypts synchronously, so the async path was exercised via cryptd offload. The unguarded aead->crypto dereference in tipc_aead_decrypt_done() is the unpatched upstream path; tipc_aead_decrypt() still lacks maybe_get_net(aead->crypto->net), so the completion can outlive the free on any config where crypto_aead_decrypt() goes async.

Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (https://0sec.ai).

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
44th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-11-09). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

July 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Jul 20, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

tipc: fix slab-use-after-free Read in tipc_aead_decrypt_done - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/eaca7dae02fab70c8d223cffe03cec1b93249ce2
Web page

tipc: fix slab-use-after-free Read in tipc_aead_decrypt_done - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e18769616fd5a90ec1e12aabbba544c488284292
Web page

tipc: fix slab-use-after-free Read in tipc_aead_decrypt_done - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dca7713fe044a2067387948557ea099056e1679e
Web page

tipc: fix slab-use-after-free Read in tipc_aead_decrypt_done - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bda3348872a2ef0d19f2df6aa8cb5025adce2f20
Web page

tipc: fix slab-use-after-free Read in tipc_aead_decrypt_done - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2d1f21419ec121232c916d3a3fc9b6766473a0e7
Web page

tipc: fix slab-use-after-free Read in tipc_aead_decrypt_done - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1eea5e1820a2f5164d706bd1277bc97ff31ce32d
Web page

tipc: fix slab-use-after-free Read in tipc_aead_decrypt_done - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/171d31245d11bf84836fad3b394cb465a4d008ec
Web page

tipc: fix slab-use-after-free Read in tipc_aead_decrypt_done - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0a780653b2a7569a7af9be7d0b00b1251baca63a

Patch Availability(23)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1035.38) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-raspi-realtime-7.0 (7.0.0-1019.19) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-2018.18) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-lts-22.04 (5.15.0.1118.115) @ jammy2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-xilinx-zynqmp-tools-5.15.0-1080 (5.15.0-1080.84) @ jammy2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-lowlatency-5.15 (5.15.0.1112.112) @ jammy2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-6.8 (6.8.0-147.147) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-lts-24.04 (6.8.0-1071.79) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1018.18) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-7.0 (7.0.0-1011.11) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-azure-edge (7.0.0-1014.14~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (5.15.0.1114.120~20.04.1) @ focal2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (5.15.0.1118.128~20.04.1) @ focal2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-31.31) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-ibm-7.0 (7.0.0-1013.13) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oem-7.0 (7.0.0-1013.13) @ resolute2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1011.11~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-hwe-24.04-edge (7.0.0-1018.18~24.04.1) @ noble2026-11-03ubuntu
redhatkernel-0:6.12.0-211.67.1.el10_22026-10-19redhat
redhatkernel-0:5.14.0-687.47.1.el9_82026-09-14redhat
redhatkernel-0:4.18.0-553.162.1.el8_102026-09-10redhat
redhatkernel-rt-0:4.18.0-553.162.1.rt7.503.el8_102026-09-10redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(5 across 4 ecosystems)
Debian:11(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux5.10.103-1 ... 5.10.92-2 (55 versions)
  • every version up to 5.10.262-1: fixed in 5.10.262-1
—
linux-6.16.1.106-3~deb11u1 ... 6.1.176-1~deb11u1 (21 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.177-1~deb11u1: fixed in 6.1.177-1~deb11u1
—
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (54 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.177-1: fixed in 6.1.177-1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.38-1 ... 6.12.95-1~bpo12+1 (29 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.95-1: fixed in 6.12.95-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (158 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.3-1: fixed in 7.1.3-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Additional Vendor Advisories

(19)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed its CVE.org record (CNA or CISA ADP). An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). "EchelonGraph re-scored" is our own recompute of this CVE's score, not an update from a source, and is not counted in the refreshes above. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 316 rows on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 216 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-13 16:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  2. 2026-11-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  3. 2026-11-11 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  4. 2026-11-10 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  5. 2026-11-09 22:51 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-11-09 22:51 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-11-09 22:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  8. 2026-11-09 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  9. 2026-11-08 16:40 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  10. 2026-11-07 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  11. 2026-11-06 16:39 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  12. 2026-11-05 16:38 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  13. 2026-11-04 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  14. 2026-11-03 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  15. 2026-11-03 08:27 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  16. 2026-11-03 08:27 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-11-03 08:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  18. 2026-11-02 16:45 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  19. 2026-11-01 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-30 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-29 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-28 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-27 18:02 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  25. 2026-10-27 18:02 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-27 18:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  2. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-25 14:13 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  6. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-19 20:20 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  12. 2026-10-19 20:20 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-19 20:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  14. 2026-10-19 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  16. 2026-10-18 03:23 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  17. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-16 17:12 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  19. 2026-10-16 17:12 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-16 17:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  21. 2026-10-16 16:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-16 15:47 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  23. 2026-10-16 15:47 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-16 15:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  25. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  26. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  27. 2026-10-13 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  28. 2026-10-13 11:55 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  29. 2026-10-13 11:55 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-13 11:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  31. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  32. 2026-10-12 15:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  33. 2026-10-11 19:33 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  34. 2026-10-11 16:48 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  35. 2026-10-11 14:09 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  36. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  37. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  38. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  39. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  40. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  41. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  42. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  43. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  44. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  45. 2026-10-02 17:56 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  46. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  47. 2026-10-01 09:11 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  48. 2026-10-01 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-01 09:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  50. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  51. 2026-09-28 13:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  52. 2026-09-28 07:42 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  53. 2026-09-28 07:42 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-28 07:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  55. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 41st percentile
  56. 2026-09-24 04:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  57. 2026-09-24 04:18 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-24 04:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  59. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  60. 2026-09-23 02:16 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  61. 2026-09-23 02:16 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-09-23 02:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  63. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  64. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  65. 2026-09-18 04:28 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  66. 2026-09-18 04:28 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-18 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  68. 2026-09-17 10:07 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  69. 2026-09-17 10:07 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-17 10:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  71. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  72. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  73. 2026-09-14 04:18 UTCEchelonGraph re-scored
  74. 2026-09-14 04:18 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-14 04:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-xqwj-phvh-5pp9 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-63801?
CVE-2026-63801 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on July 19, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tipc: fix slab-use-after-free Read in tipc_aead_decrypt_done tipc_aead_decrypt() goes straight from tipc_bearer_hold(b) to crypto_aead_decrypt(req) without taking a reference on the netns, unlike the encrypt path. When…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-63801 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-63801 was published on July 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-63801 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-63801 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (44th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-63801?
CVE-2026-63801 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-63801?
A fix for CVE-2026-63801 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-63801 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-63801

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-63801?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.