djust provides Phoenix LiveView-style reactive server-side rendering for Django with Rust-powered performance. Prior to version 1.0.7, the djust live transport resolves the LiveView to mount from a client-supplied dotted path by calling __import__(module_path, ...). The module is imported — running its top-level code (import side effects) — before the framework checks that the resolved object is a LiveView subclass and before any per-view authentication. The LIVEVIEW_ALLOWED_MODULES allowlist that should contain this is fail-open (if allowed_modules: — skipped when the setting is unset, the framework default) and uses loose startswith matching. An unauthenticated WebSocket client (the WS handshake does not require auth; per-view auth runs only after import + instantiate) can therefore send a mount / live_redirect_mount / url_change frame (or an SSE mount) with view = ".AnyName" and cause the server to import — and execute the top-level code of — any importable Python module by name. Version 1.0.7 fixes the issue with a fail-closed resolution gate (djust._view_resolution.is_view_import_allowed): a client view path resolves only if (a) its module is already loaded (sys.modules — so resolving runs no new code; URL-routed views loaded by URLconf at startup keep working with zero config) or (b) it matches LIVEVIEW_ALLOWED_MODULES on a module-segment boundary (explicit opt-in for lazily-imported views). The gate runs before __import__ at all three sinks (+ defense-in-depth inside _instantiate_view). As a workaround, set LIVEVIEW_ALLOWED_MODULES to the narrow list of modules that contain your mountable LiveView classes. (Note: pre-patch the allowlist is startswith-matched and the import still precedes the subclass check, so this is mitigation, not a complete fix.)
CVE-2026-61599
This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.4%, top 68% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 8.8
- EG Score
- 8.8(medium)
- EG Risk
- 55(Track)EG Risk 55/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity88% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 32%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 16, 2026
Last Modified
September 17, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Sep 16, 2026v1.0.7
Patch available: djust-org/djust v1.0.7
https://github.com/djust-org/djust/releases/tag/v1.0.7Unauthenticated arbitrary module import via the WebSocket/SSE view-mount path · Advisory · djust-org/djust · GitHub
https://github.com/djust-org/djust/security/advisories/GHSA-7prp-2623-8g45Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-61599(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(1 across 1 ecosystem)
PyPI(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| djust | 0.1.0 ... 1.0.6 (68 versions) | 1.0.7 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 8× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 01:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 02:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 14:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 13:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 23:28 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 22:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 22:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-61599?
When was CVE-2026-61599 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-61599 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-61599?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-61599?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-61599
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-61599?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.